PETER KWASNIEWSKI BREAKS AWAY FROM THE SSPX; SUPPORTS ECCLESIAL HIERARCHY AND APPROVED LATIN MASS COMMUNITIES
PETER KWASNIEWSKI BREAKS AWAY FROM THE SSPX; SUPPORTS ECCLESIAL HIERARCHY AND APPROVED LATIN MASS COMMUNITIES: AND INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY
Peter Kwasniewski breaks away from the SSPX and supports Pope Leo and the hierarchy and the Ecclesia Dei communities, choosing to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and accept the nontraditional conclusion and reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in schism.
In a statement posted on Gloria TV he suggests that the SSPX decision to ordain new bishops on July 1 could be ‘evil’.
In a politically correct with the Left statement, Kwasniewksi, who interprets Vatican Council II schismatically and not traditionally, approves of Pope Leo ordaining or approving the ordination and appointment of cardinals and bishops, who use the common Irrational Premise to create polarization in the Catholic Church.
He approves of the LG 16- visible mistake of Karl Rahner, which he uses to interpret Church Documents irrationally, with alleged exceptions for the dogma EENS , the Athanasius Creed and the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the 16th century.
He supports the New Theology of Larry Chapp based upon the irrational interpretation of Gaudium et Specs 22 etc in Vatican Council II.
It may be mentioned that if Peter Kwasniewski interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise he would be affirming the dogma EENS, with no exceptions, in invisible cases of the baptism of desire ( LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16).
Instead, the hierarchy of cardinals and bishops choose to interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms with the Irrational Premise creating liberalism, schism and heresy. This is the norm supported by the ecclesial hierarchy which Kwasniewski supports and does not correct.
Ignatius Press, EWTN, Catholic Answers, CAN, CNS, Reuters and AP could possibly accuse the SSPX of being in schism for not accepting Vatican Council II irrational, created with the Irrational Premise..
A journalist Bree a Dail mentions that Pope John Paul II excommunicated the SSPX for ordaining new bishops.But she does not mention that the issue was Vatican Council II, irrational, at that time. Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger were supporting a heretical, schismatic and political version of Vatican Council II.The SSPX had an obligation to reject it.
It was the obligation of the ecclesial hierarchy to inform Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with a Rational Premise and the conclusion would be traditional and ecclesiocentric. The SSPX could accept Vatican Council II, rational in harmony with Tradition.
Instead the hierarchy excommunicated Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops. They kept Rahner’ LG -16 visible mistake a secret.
Even when Pope Leo met Fr. John Berg, the Superior General of the FSSP recently, he did not disclose ‘the secret’. It would mean the SSPX would have a choice. They could accept a Vatican Council II which is ecclesiocentric and not opposed to Tradition. It would be the liberals who would be in trouble.
So presently the College of Cardinals and all the Bishops Conferences are schismatic with the False Premse. They do not choose the orthodox version of the Council.
The discovery now is that the orthodox (blue) passages in Vatican Council II dominate with the hypothetical (red) passages not being explicit exceptions for the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of Vatican Council II.
It may be mentioned, that a few years back the SSPX bishops broke away from Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano when he said that Vatican Council II (irrational) should be done away with. The SSPX statement considered this schismatic. However their statement at that time did not make the distinction between Vatican Council II rational and irrational, the Council being schismatic or orthodox and an interpretation being ethical or dishonest.
It is true Vatican Council II irrational should be scrapped but Vatican Council II rational should be retained.
SSPX CHAPEL IN ROME
At the SSPX chapel in Rome and the District Center at Albano, the priests and laity are not affirming Vatican Council II rational and Feeneyite .Neither are they affirming the dogma EENS, with invisible cases of the baptism of desire not being exceptions for EENS.
They are not doing this under pressure from the police. The political left will accuse them of being ‘terrorist’ and the police will be supported by the cardinals and bishops at the Vatican.
So the SSPX priests in Rome have changed the understanding of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and do not deny it. They do not respond to so many reports on line which interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.
All the books and magazines of the SSPX, in general, at their chapel in Rome and at Albano, are written with the Irrational and not Rational Premise. So they are obsolete as those books written by Karl Rahner, Joseph Ratzinger, Rino Fisichella, Bruno Forte and Antonio Spadero.
All this would be an important consideration for Kwasniewski.
Bishop Fellay as Superior General of the SSPX expelled Bishop Richard Williamson and Fr. Florian Abrahamowich to avoid the Anti Semitic label.
Now it is to be seen if the new bishops will interpret Vatican Council II and Magisterial Documents rationally, in harmony with Tradition.
Will the SSPX continue with their nontraditional version of Vatican Council II ? This is being done by Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Dr. Taylor Marshall and Joseph Shaw at Una Voce. They know that with the Rational Premise the Church affirm the dogma EENS, in harmony with the Magisterium and Missionaries of the 16th century.
The Church is no more in 1965. The L.A Rational Premise unites the Church on doctrine. The Rahner-Ratzinger Premise divides.
Vatican Council II has to be interpreted with the Rational Premise otherwise Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez remain in public schism.
We have a New Discovery in the Catholic Church.
The National Catholic Reporter correspondents are aligned with the SSPX, when they use the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II. There has been no denial from either of them. This is good news for the SSPX but not for the NCR.
The Lionel Andrades Premise is an insight. It is a new way looking at Vatican Council II. It is given free of cost. There is no charge. When the Council changes the Church is no more stuck in 1965.
In 2026 it is not the same Vatican Council II anymore. When you change the liberal Councils with a traditional Council, you change the Church. It returns to the past, to the time of Apostles and Jesus.
So should the SSPX ordain new bishops?
I think it is more important, that before the ordination in July, the SSPX must announce that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. They refer to invisible people in 2026.This ends the traditionalist-liberal division in the Church based upon Vatican Council II, irrational, i.e. LG 8, 14, 16 refer to explicit and objective examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times.This has always been false.
So all future cardinals and bishops with the Rational Premise will be traditional. It will be the end of the official liberalism and schism. Those who do not accept Vatican Council II rational will be in official schism. The SSPX is not obliged to accept the public schism of the ecclesial authorities. – Lionel Andrades
WITH THE RATIONAL PREMISE POPE LEO, CARD. …
02.02.2026 Feast of the Presentation
GENERAL CONSENSUS IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH : VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH THE COUNCIL OF FLORENCE 1442 ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
GENERAL CONSENSUS IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH : …