Don't fool yourself Dr Bobus. The freemasons work for the jews. St. Maximilian Kolbe called out the masons on this. It all goes back to the Church's original enemy, the jews. The money changers, the press/media, communism. They are behind every revolution. Every type of degeneracy pushed in Christian nations, the jews are behind it. They work for devil and when people begin to understand this again like in the old days, then Christianity can flourish again.

So what you're saying is the.years I spent studying and teaching theology mean nothing. I should ignore it all, instead focusing on your warning about black helicopters.

The blueprint for the mess in the Church was drawn up by the Jesuit Karl Rahner who was from German Catholic family. The theology of Amoris Laetitis comes from Joseph Fuchs, another Jesuit.

And guess what. Germany was also where Protestantism began.

@Dr Bobus Except modernism didn't start in the 20th century. There were plenty of heresies before Protestantism. And the small group of people who control all the money (central banks) and flow of information (press/media/film/most of the web) are not Germans. They are jews.

What's odd is that you would defend the satanic talmud. Why are you sympathizing with the enemies of Christ? Are you a judas?

God Hates the Jews, and on Judgment Day He will say to those who sympathize with them: “Depart from Me, for you have had intercourse with My murderers!” Flee, then, from their assemblies, fly from their houses, and, far from venerating the synagogue, hold it in hatred and aversion.’ ~ St. John Chrysostom

1. No, what's odd is that I said nothing about the Talmud, except that it is not the source of the problems in the Church.

2. The first Modernists were the Gnostics. If you don't understand why I say that, then you don't understand Modernism. The Gnostics were around in Apostolic times.

3. Gnosticism is sometimes called the Perennial Heresy. IMHO, some bit of Gnosticism is found in every heresy, including Protestantism. .

4. In the 19th cent Loisy and Tyrrell have usually been named as the founders of what has called Modernusm.

5. I referred to Protestantism because the contemporary distortion of the concepts of the Eucharist (meal) and the Priesthood are due to attempts by ecumaniacs to produce a one size fits all theology used by both Protestants and Catholics. The German Karl Rahner SJ was the prime theological mover.

The Novus Ordo is a product of these same attempts.

What does that question have to do with anything?

BTW, I'm on this website because Don Reto, an old frend, invited me.

You act surprised at the situation. Christ said 2000 years ago in the 4th Gospel: The world hates me.

There has always been opposition to the Church. Now it's just more open. When Thomas Merton wrote The Seven Story Mountain in the 1940s, it was the #2 bestseller but not listed among the bestsellers. He had friends in the publishing industry who

I come from an anti Catholic family, so opposition is nothing new to me. I've had friends who were tossed out of their homes by oarents when they converted. I know one girl who became a nun in the South of France in 1980. Her father, a widower, died last year never having vIsited her. I know a priest whose father was a Biochemistr prof who dI ed a few years ago without ever having contact with his Catholic son. The priest's sister, a fairly well known mystery writer, became an Episcopalian The father burnt all her clothes.

There is now huge confusion in the Church, but I don't consider it to have come from someexternal plot. There have been cultural changes that many in the Church can't handle. Some think doctrine and liturgy should be bent to adjust to the culture. Others, like Papa Ratzinger, favor a kind of pruning, producing a more purified Church.

I must admit that episcopal opposition to Summorum Pontificum was a bit of a surprise. Not from the German bishops who made it clear to him during his visit there that they wanted no part of it, but the opposition of others such as some French bishops.