Der international diskutierte Spot im Super Bowl. Im 30-sekündigen Werbefilm während der Super Bowl verkündet die evangelikale Christin Pam Tebow, sie hätte ihren Sohn Tim 1987 abgetrieben, wenn sie …Mehr
Der international diskutierte Spot im Super Bowl.
Im 30-sekündigen Werbefilm während der Super Bowl verkündet die evangelikale Christin Pam Tebow, sie hätte ihren Sohn Tim 1987 abgetrieben, wenn sie damals den Empfehlungen der Mediziner gefolgt wäre.
Die beiden werben vor allem für eine gute Mutter-Sohn-Beziehung.
Im 30-sekündigen Werbefilm während der Super Bowl verkündet die evangelikale Christin Pam Tebow, sie hätte ihren Sohn Tim 1987 abgetrieben, wenn sie damals den Empfehlungen der Mediziner gefolgt wäre.
Die beiden werben vor allem für eine gute Mutter-Sohn-Beziehung.
Reesorville
- Melden
Kommentar ändern
Kommentar entfernen
It's a big offtopic from this particular ad, although I am reminded of something by it:
Rocco Buttiglione last year in the Italian parliament successfully passed a resolution that (if memory serves me) condemned states (eg. China) that forced people to have abortions as a result of pplans of population control. During the motion, the pro-choice politicans abstained from voting, and therby the bill …Mehr
It's a big offtopic from this particular ad, although I am reminded of something by it:
Rocco Buttiglione last year in the Italian parliament successfully passed a resolution that (if memory serves me) condemned states (eg. China) that forced people to have abortions as a result of pplans of population control. During the motion, the pro-choice politicans abstained from voting, and therby the bill was allowed to pass.
I think that if the big players in the pro-choice movement were actually in favour of giving people a choice they would have been opposed to states that forced people to have abortions and gave them no choice in the matter... and yet, why does Planned Parenthood work in China then? Why do they financially support the abortion policy in China? Why does their website say they support the government's policy (see: www.ippf.org/en/Where/CN.htm)? Why aren't "pro-choice" politicians denouncing the lack of choice in countries that force people to have abortion (as opposed to abstaining from bills that condemn this)? Why aren't they upset about that just as they are upset about the lack of choice in places that restrict abortion?
As much as they might complain about being labelled 'pro-abortion' rather than 'pro-choice'... I don't see any other way around it... If the organizations that attacked this ad really were pro-choice they would have supported a 'right to choose' rather than mandatory abortion policies in other countries. Therefore they obviously are pro-abortion and not pro-choice.
John 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
God Bless,
Rocco Buttiglione last year in the Italian parliament successfully passed a resolution that (if memory serves me) condemned states (eg. China) that forced people to have abortions as a result of pplans of population control. During the motion, the pro-choice politicans abstained from voting, and therby the bill was allowed to pass.
I think that if the big players in the pro-choice movement were actually in favour of giving people a choice they would have been opposed to states that forced people to have abortions and gave them no choice in the matter... and yet, why does Planned Parenthood work in China then? Why do they financially support the abortion policy in China? Why does their website say they support the government's policy (see: www.ippf.org/en/Where/CN.htm)? Why aren't "pro-choice" politicians denouncing the lack of choice in countries that force people to have abortion (as opposed to abstaining from bills that condemn this)? Why aren't they upset about that just as they are upset about the lack of choice in places that restrict abortion?
As much as they might complain about being labelled 'pro-abortion' rather than 'pro-choice'... I don't see any other way around it... If the organizations that attacked this ad really were pro-choice they would have supported a 'right to choose' rather than mandatory abortion policies in other countries. Therefore they obviously are pro-abortion and not pro-choice.
John 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
God Bless,
This great video shows just how insane the pro-death abortion crowd is. The pro-abortion crowd is not "pro-choice"-they are pro-abortion. In order for them to be for choice or pro-choice they would want both sides of the issue exposed in order for someone to actually make a choice. The pro-death crowd called this video controversial because it was an advertisement celibrating life-wow what a horrible …Mehr
This great video shows just how insane the pro-death abortion crowd is. The pro-abortion crowd is not "pro-choice"-they are pro-abortion. In order for them to be for choice or pro-choice they would want both sides of the issue exposed in order for someone to actually make a choice. The pro-death crowd called this video controversial because it was an advertisement celibrating life-wow what a horrible thing! To the "pro-choice" crowd the only choice they promote is abortion. For the pro-choice crowd to want this commercial banned shows indeed how insane and bloodthirsty they truly are. They are so hungry for abortion they do not even want someone to consider giving birth to their child. Satan is very evident in the "pro-choice" movement.
Misericordia
- Melden
Kommentar ändern
Kommentar entfernen
Bravo, bravo, bravo!Die Menschlichkeit ist wieder auf dem Vormarsch!
![👍](/emoji/f09f918d)