CATHOLICS MUST CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE LIKE THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER IN NH AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II RED LIKE THE SSPX.
CATHOLICS MUST CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE LIKE THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER IN NH AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II RED LIKE THE SSPX.
There is a major shift in theology in the Catholic Church.
Rahner, Ratzinger and Balthazar are contradicted by Vatican Council II blue.
The traditionalist at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire are now the mainstream Catholic Church, with Vatican Council II and EENS, only blue.
The traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center in the diocese of Manchester now have the mainline theology with the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, blue. Cardinal Muller, Balthazar, Ratzinger, Bishop Barron and Larry Chapp with Vatican II, red are schismatic and obsolete. There can only be a lex orandi with Vatican Council II blue.
We can now interpret Vatican Council II rationally like the SBC or irrationally like the SSPX and the liberals.
We can interpret all the catechisms, including the catechism of Pope John Paul II, rationally or irrationally. This is a new discovery.
All this is not known to the new bishop in Leeds, England who has closed down the Latin Mass. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is red. While the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal and the Latin Mass is blue.
1. How can you have a bishop who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally? The Creeds Councils and Catechisms must only be interpreted rationally.
2. How can there be a Novus Ordo Mass in English in Leeds with Vatican Council II red? This cannot be the lex orandi.
3. How can there still be a liberal Curia in Leeds when we can interpret all Magisterial Documents rationally?
4. How can Cardinal Arthur Roche still be the Prefect for the Dicastery for the Faith when he interprets the Vatican Council II irrationally and so non magisterially. He is in schism with the Athanasius Creed, blue and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, blue, unlike the St. Benedict Center in NH. USA.
Times have changed. The Church today has aligned itself with the old Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, only blue.
There is a theological shift in the Catholic Church with Vatican Council II, blue and Pope Leo can no more justify the synods and other liberalism in the name of the Council interpreted irrationally.
Pope Leo is still red on Vatican Council II and so there are exceptions for the dogma EENS, also red. There is the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition (EENS, blue etc).
But the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in New Hampshire are blue on Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire. So there are no visible exceptions for the dogma EENS, also blue. There is also the hermeneutic of continuity with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Pius IX.
Vatican Council II blue is aligned with Tradition but Vatican Council II red is a rupture.
If the SSPX ‘chooses blue’ they are mainstream in the Catholic Church. The pope and the liberal left cannot push the irrational version of Magisterial Documents.
If there are 10 cardinals and bishop who accept Vatican Council II blue how can Pope Leo continue to interpret the Council irrationally, dishonestly and schismatically ?
Bishop Joseph Strickland and the USCCB are red on Vatican Council II and so is Terry Barber at Virgin Most Powerful Radio.
The lex orandi is ecclesiocentric since Tradition and Vatican Council II and the Catechisms are ecclesiocentric.
How can ‘a red pope’ be elected by ‘a red College of Cardinals’? All have to be ‘blue’.
St.Ignatius of Loyola was ‘blue’. So how can the Jesuits today be ‘red’?
Fr. James Martin sj cannot support LGBT ideology with Vatican Council II, ‘blue’.If Pope Leo chooses Vatican Council II blue, will cardinals McElroy, Cupich and Radcliffe, go into public schism? - Lionel Andrades
22.12.2025 FOR MOTHER TERESA IT WAS VATICAN COUNCIL RED BUT FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C AND FR. JAN TIMOR M.C IT IS VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE. At every Mass and liturgy the Council is no more liberal. FOR MOTHER TERESA IT WAS VATICAN COUNCIL RED BUT …