CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL PARTIES IN ITALY MUST ASK THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN TO CLARIFY THE CATHOLIC FAITH FOR MIGRANTS
CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL PARTIES IN ITALY MUST ASK THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN TO CLARIFY THE CATHOLIC FAITH FOR MIGRANTS
The conservative political parties in Italy need to issue a statement calling upon the Archbishop of Milan to clarify the Catholic Faith for all and so permit conservative cardinals, bishops and priests to participate in their political meetings.
The statement could briefly mention some of the following points.
1. We respect all people and appreciate the good things in other religions, but we have our Catholic Faith, outside of which no one goes to Heaven (AG 7, Vatican Council II etc).
2. Not a single cardinal, bishop or priest participated at the Milan Meeting last week. For a Catholic, Jesus cannot be separated from the Church and the Church cannot be separated from politics and legislation. The Vatican must provide a system whereby conservative priests can participate in politics. A priest or bishop must not be excommunicated for participating in politics when the pope has aligned the Church with the political Left, which follows Satan.
3. Canonically there cannot be an Archbishop of Milan, for example, who does not affirm the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed in their original understanding. Neither can an archbishop who confuses what is invisible in Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) as being visible, to produce a false and liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II, be allowed to legally hold his office.
4. The Lega, for example, could ask the Archbishop of Milan to affirm the Catholic Faith in public especially among those who follow the Koran.
An archbishop of Milan who cannot affirm the Catechism of Pope John Paul II in harmony with all the catechisms, interpreted rationally must not offer Holy Mass according to Canon Law.
5. The paradigms have changed. The constructs have changed. We measure Vatican Council II differently. Ratzinger and Lefebvre are of the past. We have a new way of looking at Vatican Council II and the Catechism. Vatican Council II rational is theologically in harmony with the Society of St. Pius X, Franciscans of the Immaculate and Ecclesia Dei communities and not Pope Leo, the Bishops conferences and the liberal College of Cardinals and Synods.
6.Muslim migrants must be told that the Catholic Church teaches that Muslims in general, are on the way to Hell , without Catholic faith and the baptism of water ( John 3:5, Mark 16:16, AG 7, CCC 845-846 etc).The norm for salvation is ‘faith and baptism ‘(AG 7) and not the baptism of desire ( LG 14) and ignorance ( LG 16).
7. The rational interpretation of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms is the official teaching the Church, before and after Vatican Council II. With Magisterial Documents interpreted only rationally and so honestly, there is continuity and not rupture with the Magisterium over the centuries. With the irrational interpretation of Pope Leo we have schism.
8. Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church have continuity with the popes of the Middle Ages, the Church Fathers, the Apostles and the traditional interpretation of the Bible.
9. Pope Leo and the archbishop of Milan have still not informed Muslim migrants that they must convert into the Catholic Church, with faith and baptism to avoid the fires of Hell. This is the post Conciliar teaching of the Catholic Church. There cannot be ‘reforms’ based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and so dishonestly.
11. A resolution could appeal to all Catholics, to affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church only rationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA2; GS 22 etc, refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only in 2026. The mainline Catholic Church becomes conservative once again.
12. The Catholic Church returns to the traditional faith and morals of historical Rome.
13. The Catholic political parties must not accept encyclicals, papal documents and statements, based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally. The pope must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally i.e. AG 7 is aligned with the dogma EENS and LG 8, 14, 16 etc are not explicit exceptions for AG 7, the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal, the Athanasius Creed and the ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church of the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX.
15. We wish to live in peace with all people in Catholic Italy and call for respect and tolerance for our Catholic beliefs. Jesus is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.
- Lionel Andrades,
In Rome,
Discoverer of Vatican Council II rational and irrational.
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN MUST BE ASKED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II HONESTLY.
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN MUST BE ASKED TO …
25.04.2025
BIBLE READING AT THE HOLY MASS TODAY SAYS ‘THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE WILL BE CONDEMNED’
BIBLE READING AT THE HOLY MASS TODAY SAYS ‘THOSE …
23.04.2025
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT …
22.04.2025
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S SECRET: NO BISHOP PARTICIPATED
With Vatican Council II rational and traditional the mainline Catholic Church is conservative once again.
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S …
21.04.2026
WHEN THE SSPX SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS THE HERMENEUTIC OF DISCONTINUITY AND CARD. MULLER SAYS IT HAS A CONTINUITY THEY ARE VAGUE : WE CAN NOW BE SPECIFIC
WHEN THE SSPX SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS THE …
18.04.2026
SSPX INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY LIKE POPE FRANCIS IN EVANGELII GAUDIUM
SSPX INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY …