SEDEVACANTISTS MUST FORMALLY ASK WHY IS MCELROY ‘IN’ AND THEY ‘OUT’ WHEN THE COUNCIL IS TRADITIONAL
SEDEVACANTISTS MUST FORMALLY ASK WHY IS MCELROY ‘IN’ AND THEY ‘OUT’ WHEN THE COUNCIL IS TRADITIONAL
How can Cardinal McElroy be a cardinal when he does not affirm Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Catechism of Pope Pius X and other Magisterial Documents, rationally and so honestly? Sedevacantists (CMRI), MHT MHFM etc) must ask at the Signatura and secular courts.
Sedevacantists simply have to affirm the Council rationally and ask Pope Leo and the College of Cardinals to do the same.
Why must they be kept outside the Church? They simply have to affirm the Creeds, rationally and so traditionally and tell the Vatican to do the same. They do not have to cite Bellarmine. The issue is Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Sedevacantists must legally ask how Cardinal McElroy or any cardinal can be appointed a cardinal, when the cardinal does not affirm Vatican Council II etc rationally. He should be out of the Church and not the sedevacantists.
We now have unity in doctrine and theology and McElroy in San Diego cannot bluff and fudge. ‘O.K you affirm homosexual unions but you also have to accept Vatican Council II ‘.
‘So from where do you draw your theology to support LGBT ideology? Not from Vatican Council II’.
McElroy interprets the Creeds, Councils and Catechism irrationally and so liberally. This is dishonesty. He is disqualified as a cardinal.
Sedevacantists must ask formally why they are outside the Church when the Tradition which they affirm is aligned with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
It is Pope Leo and the College of Cardinals who are in schism and outside the Catholic Church.
If a pope does not affirm Vatican Council II it is an issue for all Catholics.
The central point is that it is obligatory for all Catholics, to accept the Bible, Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. This applies to the pope, cardinals and bishops. These Magisterial Documents can only be interpreted rationally and so they support the traditionalists.
They support the sedevacantists who are traditionalists.c - Lionel Andrades