Genetic engineering interventions for the prevention of infectious diseases must be stopped and banned immediately, write Bhakdi, Hockertz, Sterz, Wodarg et al. in an open letter.
tkp.at Dec 13 2025
In a dramatic open letter, the most important German scientific critics of the Corona measures from the very beginning, including Helmut Sterz, Dr. med. Wolfgang Wodarg, Prof. Dr. med. Sucharit Bhakdi, and Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Stefan W. Hockertz, make it unequivocally clear: "Anyone still participating is acting criminally!"
Despite all attempts at a cover-up, the extent of what is arguably the greatest crime in human history is becoming increasingly clear. Since 2020, the world has been lied to and tormented by a treacherously orchestrated fear campaign and subjected to insane measures. All of this served to make people receptive to genetic engineering experiments that were previously considered irresponsibly taboo.
Since 2021, it has become increasingly clear what immeasurable suffering and misery those in positions of responsibility in politics, industry, government, research, the military, media, medicine, and finance have inflicted on millions of people. Their path is littered with corpses, and there has been no mercy for children, pregnant women, or the disabled. The brutal greed for money and global control lurking behind the fine-sounding platitudes of environmental protection, prevention, democracy, solidarity, and technological progress is becoming ever more apparent.
From our point of view, the hard data on excess mortality, the increase in chronic and malignant diseases, the decline in birth rates, and the oppressive restrictions on our fundamental rights reveal the whole scandal surrounding the fake pandemic.
The vaccination program was doomed to failure from the very beginning.
Was the genetic engineering vaccine debacle scientifically predictable? We answer this question unequivocally with "Yes." From the outset, based solely on textbook knowledge, we were certain that the so-called "Covid-19 vaccinations" would do more harm than good. Bhakdi et al. (2025) go a step further and explain, in language understandable even to laypeople, that all injections based on modified mRNA ("modRNA injections") will be potentially life-threatening (2). The term "modRNA" instead of "mRNA" that we have chosen here is not merely a linguistic subtlety. Steger (2025) clarifies this by highlighting the dangers of modRNA in contrast to the mRNA provided to us by nature (3).
All modRNA injections will harm humans.
Whether it's a modRNA injection against coronaviruses, influenza, or RSV, the key mechanisms of damage are inherent to modRNA technology. This can be explained by one of the fundamental mechanisms of action of modRNA injections: The injection causes a foreign protein produced by our own body cells (in the case of COVID-19 injections, the "spike") to trigger an auto-attack by our immune system against these cells. This also leads to damage to endothelial cells lining our blood vessels, resulting in vascular leakage and clot formation. If this occurs in capillary areas, microthromboses develop, which do not immediately lead to death but rather to impaired function of the affected organ. The tissue damage can be extremely varied, partly due to the systemic distribution of the vaccine throughout the body. Therefore, its full extent remains difficult to assess to this day.
Inflammation of the heart, brain and spinal cord, as well as the promotion of cancer – a list of horrors.
The alarming list of suspected adverse events following vaccination is so extensive that we can only address a few particularly dangerous, established cases here:
As early as spring 2024, the National Academy of Sciences, a renowned body of high-ranking American scientists, published an evidence report on COVID-19 modRNA vaccinations (4). Since the publication of this report, it has been established that myocarditis is definitely caused by the vaccination. Furthermore, since at least the end of 2022, thanks to the work of pathologist Michael Mörz, it was clear that COVID-19 vaccinations cause damage to the central nervous system (5). Mörz, like pathologists Burkhardt and Lang, conducted histopathological analyses. A collection of these analyses was recently published as a book entitled "Vaccinated-Dead" by Ute Krüger (6). The extent of damage to the central nervous system after administration of modRNA injections can be gleaned from the study published these days by McCullough's team (7). Due to the mechanism of action of modRNA injections and the plasmid DNA they contain, which is a remnant from the manufacturing process, they are suspected of being carcinogenic . The results of initial systematic studies from Italy and South Korea regarding the link between COVID-19 injections and cancer are more than alarming (8) and (9). The ongoing scientific debate about the impact of genetic engineering immunization experiments on human fertility has recently gained new momentum: Israeli researchers, using a highly sensitive yet extremely reliable detection method called nested PCR, were able to detect the spike gene in blood, placenta, and semen many weeks and months after the last COVID-19 injection (the Pfizer/BioNTech injection) (10).
Massive DNA contamination of the injections has been known since 2023.
It must be assumed that the catastrophic health damage caused by the injections is also related to their production process: In 2023, the renowned US scientist Kevin McKernan published findings that all vaccine batches he examined contained large quantities of residual bacterial DNA from the manufacturing process (11). The already significant implications of this discovery were amplified many times over when research teams showed that a large portion of the bacterial DNA is packaged in lipid nanoparticles and delivered into cells along with the modRNA (12,13). Unlike modRNA, which remains in the cytoplasm, DNA is transported into the cell nucleus, thereby significantly increasing the likelihood of its integration into the genome and the resulting transformation of the cell into a cancer cell (14,15).
These days, another sensational discovery by McKernan's group was announced (16). To understand this, one must consider the following scientific fact: When DNA is transcribed into mRNA, traces of hybrids between mRNA and its corresponding DNA are always created. These hybrids are dangerous – they are like sparks from a sparkler and are naturally extinguished immediately by an enzyme. This is essential because otherwise, fires can break out in the chromosomes – with all conceivable consequences such as cancer, malformations, autoimmune diseases, and cell death. Now, McKernan's group has discovered nanolipid-encapsulated hybrids in the vaccines, which are created by the mass production process using plasmids (bacterial minichromosomes). These hybrids cannot be destroyed by conventional methods. This is highly relevant from a legal perspective: BioNTech received regulatory approval for a process without (!) the use of bacterial plasmids!
The lipid nanoparticle packaging ensures that these highly dangerous hybrids will enter all kinds of body cells. With each cell division, they enter the cell nuclei. It is well known that, thanks to the artificial pseudouridine building blocks, they are quite resistant to the body's natural destruction mechanisms. They are not mere sparks, but veritable fireballs.
The irony is that the use of pseudouridine is unavoidable for all modRNA injections. The consequence is equally unavoidable: without ensuring that an injection contains no hybrids, every administration is tantamount to an attempted killing.
Due to the numerous established injuries described here and the undeniable contamination of the injections, we state at this point that any future administration of a modRNA injection (not only in attempts for infection prophylaxis) is a life-threatening danger and therefore, in our view, must be considered a serious crime without an informed individual assessment based on extensive knowledge.
"We couldn't have known that."
Really? Was all of this just an “oversight” and “could not have been prevented”? This time, our answer is a clear “NO.” We take a look at pages 661 ff. of the Robert Koch Institute protocols (17), which have now been made publicly available through a leak. This is the protocol from April 27, 2020. It states: “Several vaccines will be available, which were developed and tested in an accelerated process. Relevant data will only be collected post-marketing.” From these words, it is perfectly clear that human trials were planned. A detailed and illuminating analysis of the entire protocols can be found in Barucker et al. (18).
"Development in fast forward" – what does that mean?
Here, the expert in drug toxicology, Dr. Helmut Sterz, provides evidence that the procedure was planned and carried out by a mafia-like organization whose primary goal was to bring its "vaccine" to market at lightning speed! This organization includes not only pharmaceutical manufacturers but also officials from health authorities, government, the military, and all the institutions that invest massively in Big Pharma. Accordingly, he titles his book, published on December 1, 2025, "The Vaccine Mafia" (19).
His main argument, which clearly demonstrates that in the area of preclinical safety testing not only negligence but also deliberate and therefore criminal misconduct is present, is as follows:
1. Since prophylactic immunization against Covid-19 is a relatively minor illness for healthy individuals, with a mortality rate comparable to that of moderate influenza, it would have been essential to rule out any significant health risk for those willing to be vaccinated through toxicity testing before approval . This criticism arises from the following standard practice: The extent of necessary in vitro or animal safety tests depends directly on the drug's indication and the population being treated. In the case of cancer therapy, toxicological investigations can be limited to a few experiments, as the patient's goal is to survive their illness. For this, they are willing to endure even relatively serious side effects of the therapy.
2. Various international guidelines (WHO, ICH, EMA, FDA) provide guidance on which studies must be conducted before use in clinical development and (potentially) after market approval. Pfizer and BioNTech have not conducted any animal studies that would allow for a risk assessment for humans . The data from two toxicity studies in rats are included in the preclinical section of the FDA approval dossier and prove that these are useless "fig leaf" studies. Given the massive number of serious adverse events and deaths among patients shortly after the provisional approval of Comirnaty, the manufacturers should have investigated the causes of these adverse effects . Alternatively, the relevant authorities should have imposed a moratorium. Nothing of the sort happened, and Pfizer and BioNTech still maintain that their gene therapy product is safe.
3. To determine the preclinical safety of Comirnaty, in addition to a rat study on general toxicity, a combined rat study investigating disturbances in fertility, pregnancy, and postnatal development of the offspring was conducted. As mentioned above, these two studies lack sufficient relevance for risk assessment in humans due to significant shortcomings. Thus, humans were used as test subjects without any safety net, even though the Nuremberg Code strictly prohibits this.
4. The following toxicological studies, which could have provided valuable predictive information on toxicity, were not performed, although Comirnaty was recommended for regular booster doses:
Pharmacokinetic studies
Dose-finding studies on general toxicity
General toxicity study (3 months) on a relevant animal species
Mutagenicity/genotoxicity studies
Male fertility study
Teratogenicity study in a relevant non-rodent
Juvenile toxicity study
Safety pharmacology studies
Immunotoxicity studies
Interaction studies
Such a deficient preclinical safety strategy, lacking any scientific basis, must be branded as inhumane and criminal . It seemed that all those responsible were solely concerned with wasting no time before Comirnaty's approval, so that enormous profits could be made before an alleged killer virus could be exposed as ordinary flu.
Our demands and a forecast
Our key demands were formulated by one of the signatories, Dr. Helmut Sterz. They can be found in a concise form in the first section of the recently published article by Walach (20). We fully endorse the demands formulated therein.
We also urge every reader of this article to sign the following “mRNA moratorium”: Unser Moratorium unterzeichnen .
We opened our article with the headline that, due to the developments of recent weeks and the discovery of further mechanisms of harm from genetically engineered injections, an end to the administration of these poisons is absolutely essential. After reading the article, we believe there can be no longer any doubt on this point.
However, we go a step further: since the aforementioned damage mechanisms are essentially inherent to modRNA technology, we are now also calling for the beginning of the end of the application of this technology as a preventive measure against infectious diseases.
Dr. med. vet. Helmut Sterz,
Dr. med. Wolfgang Wodarg,
Prof. Dr. med. Sucharit Bhakdi,
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Stefan W. Hockertz,
Attorney Philipp Kruse, LL.M.
, Jens Wernicke, Publishing Director, Rubikon-Verlag
—————————
Source article, translated from German: Offener Brief: „Wer jetzt noch mitmacht, handelt …
Sources
washingtonpost.com/…nts/3042d15c-676b-48ac-8148- …
Bhakdi et al. (2025) Infektionen verstehen – statt fürchten: Von …
Steger (2025): …
National Academy of Sciences (2024): nationalacademies.org/read/27746/chapter/2
Mörz (2022): A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing …
Krüger (2025): thalia.at/shop/home/artikeldetails/A1076993966
Cosgrove et al. (2025): View of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: implications …
Martellucci et al. (2025): COVID-19 vaccination, all-cause mortality, and …
Kim et al. (2025): 1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 …
Mordechay et al. (2025): doi.org/10.29011/2574-7754.102428
McKernan et al. (2023): osf.io/b9t7m_v1
Kämmerer et al. (2024): BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain …
Speicher et al. (2024): doi.org/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517
Martellucci et al. (2025): COVID-19 vaccination, all-cause mortality, and …
Kim et al. (2025): 1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 …
McKernan et al. (2025) : Veterans Day Vials
corona-protokolle.net/wp- …
Barucker (2025): Vereinnahmte Wissenschaft: Die Corona-Protokolle …
Sterz (2025): Die Impf-Mafia: Wie Pfizer und Co. uns …
Pfizers Ex-Cheftoxikologe packt aus – DIE ACHSE …
Image “ Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 vials 2023 ” by Whispyhistory is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 .
Our work is funded by donations – we ask for your support .
Follow TKP on Telegram or GETTR and subscribe to our newsletter .