Bishop Robert Morlino, Fr.John Zuhlsdorf, Catholics in general still interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational theology : not the work of the Holy Spirit
May 19, 2017
Bishop Robert Morlino, Fr.John Zuhlsdorf, Catholics in general still interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational theology : not the work of the Holy Spirit
Formation of a new “Latin Mass Society of Central NJ” Catholics are still interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational theology. This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit Traditionalists/Conservative Catholics are still interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational theology. This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.Bishop Morlino, Fr.John Zuhlsdorf use an irrational premise to stay politically correct on Vatican Council and act as if this is is normal and all right.They do not respond when this is brought to their attention. Since this is what the two popes and the Jewish Left demand, Catholics are choosing evil,irrationality and heresy to protect their personal interests.Even though Cushingism produces a heretical conclusion they will not interpret Vatican Council II with rational Feeneyism. If Catholics interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism they will be threathened. Priests will lose their incardination and professors will lose their mandatum to teach theology.So the bishops, acting for the Masons, who represent Satan,even control the theology of the Tridentine Rite Mass. Fr.John Zuhlsdorf on his blog has announced a new Latin Mass Society in Madison, USA whose theology is not that of the Holy Spirit 1 .
Bishop Robert Morlino at Madison has not denied many reports. He uses Cushingite theology to interpret Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995), the Nicene Creed, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Dominus Iesus etc.He is politically correct with the Left and Satan. (continued below) ________________________________
(continued from above) With Cushingite theology at Madison they interpret magisterial documents.This is approved by the ADL, USCCB and popes Francis and Benedict.So according to their New Theology there are exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II ( LG 16 etc) to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is false theology. There are no practical exceptions to the dogma EENS says Chis Ferrara.How can zero cases of something be exceptions to EENS asks John Martignoni ? To say that people who do not exist in our reality are exceptions to EENS cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit. If a pope contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction it still is a contradiction.How can invisible cases of the baptism of desire who are now in Heaven be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS on earth ? The same error is being made in Poland, a Catholic country where there is a split between Church and State,since the theology is Cushingite.The new theology is pro-Satan. If they reverse the theology, choose Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, automatically, without choosing a new theology, they are back to the old ecclesiology of the Church on outside the Church there is no salvation.The diamond was there always.Only the dirt, encrustments, prisms and dull glass covered it.It produced something new.When it is cleared we are back to view of the old diamond. Traditionalist/Conservative Catholics have still not denied that they use a false theology and new doctrines created by this false theology, to change Church teaching on salvation,faith, mission, ecclesiology, ecumenism etc. If we acknowledge that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II made a mistake, in accepting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, it is easier to see the same philosphical error of Boston- 1949 all over Vatican Council II.It is repeated in the text. If we can admit that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, are not visible exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),as they had wrongly assumed in 1949, then Vatican Council II changes before our very eyes.It is the same Vatican Council II text but the premises and the conclusions are different. Traditionalists/Conservative Catholics would realize that all these years they made a doctrinal mistake in Vatican Council II, since their new philosophy and new theology,has its foundation in irrationality.For political reasons Church doctrine was changed in 1949 and then in 1965 and this was accepted by the popes, cardinals and most Catholics. But this can all be changed now. We simply have to look at Vatican Council II in a different way.If we assume that there are good things and wrong things, texts which support EENS and others which contradict EENS, we are still using Cushingite theology.It is still the same Cushingite way of interpreting Vatican Council II.If we assume that Vatican Council II affirms the 'rigorist interpretation' of EENS and there are no exceptions to EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) since invisible and hypothetical cases are just that,invisible, then we are correctly reading the text of Vatican Council II without the irrational premise.We infer correctly that invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) do not exist visibly in our reality.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 26, 2016 I am avoiding the New Theology which assumes hypothetical cases are personally known in the present or past times, in particular, the hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/i-am-avoiding-n…
If the SSPX is unilaterally accepted by the Vatican it still means that the SSPX is condoning a heretical and non traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II, as is being done by Fr. Z eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/if-sspx-is-unil…
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf's understanding of the Church is Christocentric. It is the same as the liberals.He has no concept of a Church with an exclusivist ecclesiology. He has been religiously formed with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/frjohn-zuhlsdor…
What if Cardinal Burke and Fr. Zuhlsdorf said that there are no known exceptions to Catholic moral and salvation theology ?.Would they lose their religious faculties in Rome? eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/what-if-cardina… April 21, 2016
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/response-to-frj… Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 2
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 3
Until Fr.Zuhlsdorf or a bishop affirms the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism lay Catholics have to affirm the Faith independently and with the opposition of the local Cushingite bishop eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/until-frzuhlsdo…
APRIL 30, 2017
Conference speakers and others can still now, ' one year after Amoris Laetitia' , 'seek clarity' on the heretical statement of Pope Benedict last March 2016. eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/conference-spea…
Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupture eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-benedict-x…
