Catholic professors of philosophy and theology admit the Magisterium made a mistake but do not want to say so in public : Philosophical mistake also there in the text of Vatican Council II
Catholic professors of philosophy and theology in Rome and abroad are denying the Catholic Faith even after being informed.They will admit that invisible baptism of desire is not a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) but will not say in public that the Holy Office 1949 made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.They will not say in public that Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and non traditional conclusion.Pope Benedict was really promoting the hermeneutic of rupture. I am the only one, as a lay man saying this after having discovered the error of the invisible baptism of desire being a visible exception to traditional EENS.The professors agree that this is a mistake of the Magisterium but do not want to elaborate .-Lionel Andrades
There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and once the error is identified and avoided, the interpretation of the Council radically changes.There is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II ' excuse anymore
So it is only by using an irrationality that the present magisterium can re-interpret magisterial documents and say Vatican Council II indicates all Jews and Muslims in Italy do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016
Yet it is with this reasoning that cardinals Ratzinger,Kasper and other liberals interpret Vatican Council II. They use an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion.They with their executive power in the Vatican, they call it magisterial eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/yet-it-is-with-…
NOVEMBER 23, 2016 The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have set a precedent for all religious communities.They have announced that they accept Vatican Council II without Rahnerian theology.This is extra ordinary. Since they are not denying the Council and neither are they denying Tradition
Can the SSPX accept Vatican Council II like the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to get canonical status ? : No one tells the pope that he is interpreting Vatican Council II with bad philosophy and bad theology which has now been exposed
NOVEMBER 20, 2016 When we get rid of the Rahnerian theology to interpret Vatican Council II then Catholics in general can know the importance of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation : Feast of Christ the King eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/when-we-get-rid…
NOVEMBER 14, 2016 Don Francesco Riscossa has made an objective error. Lumen Gentium 8 refers to a hypothetical case and so it is not relevant or an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which he has cited in part one of the conference.
Don Allessandro Minutella does not deny it : there is no theology in Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and an ecumenism of return, Vatican Council II is in accord with the Lefbrists and 'integralists' whom he criticizes in the video
NOVEMBER 8, 2016 Today the magisterium wants the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objective in the present times and they are not doing so.Neither would I.
Once we avoid the new theology, with the irrational premise then the conclusion is traditional. We have the old ecclesiology and upon it we base the teaching on religious liberty, ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue
Once you have identified the new theology and avoided it,it is possible to view Vatican Council II in the light of Tradition. We would be back to the old ecclesiology at any Mass eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/once-you-have-i…
NOVEMBER 7, 2016 Pope Benedict XVI was promoting the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition
