Unprecedented! Philosophical mistakes discovered in Vatican Council II
DECEMBER 15, 2016
UNPRECEDENTED! PHILOSOPHICAL MISTAKES DISCOVERED IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
It's unprecedented.Philosophical mistakes have been discovered in Vatican Council II which was unknown or un-reported over the last 50 years.It has completely changed the understanding of the Council which was always traditional. For the liberals this will be a big blow. So media like CRUX is not reporting on it. It means Vatican Council II had a continuity all along with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), which the main steam media calls the 'rigorist interpretation'. The liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II could only be made with the philosophical error.This intepretation was made by assuming what is hypothetical is not hypothetical.Invisible cases were considered visible.The liberals' famous case of the catechumen who allegedly was known is really unknown.With this false premise(visible cases of the baptism of desire etc) a non traditional conclusion (there is known salvation outside the Church so the dogma has exceptions)was created. This non traditional and heretical conclusion in the interpretation of Vatican Council II was rejected by the traditionalists.However it was accepted by the magisterium, the liberals and the Left. Now when religious are asked basic philosophical questions, they can see where it is leading to and they refuse to answer, or be quoted.Similarly at the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome there are priest -professors who continue to teach a lie.Their interpretation of Vatican Council II, is based on the philosophical error.They maintain the error even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 15, 2016 Sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn unaware of many philosophical errors in Vatican Council
OCTOBER 3, 2016 There are lay and religious Catholics who are aware of the error and have proclaimed it. I assume they proclaim the Catholic Faith without the common confusion,privately.In public if they are priests they could be suspended by the present magisterium supported by the political Left eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/there-are-lay-a… OCTOBER 3, 2016 The Holy Spirit cannot teach error …More
OCTOBER 3, 2016
There are lay and religious Catholics who are aware of the error and have proclaimed it. I assume they proclaim the Catholic Faith without the common confusion,privately.In public if they are priests they could be suspended by the present magisterium supported by the political Left eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/there-are-lay-a…
OCTOBER 3, 2016
The Holy Spirit cannot teach error. We see here that the living Magisterium is irrational.Their conclusion is non traditional and heretical.They can choose to interpret Vatican Council II rationally if they want to eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-holy-spirit…
OCTOBER 8, 2016 Cardinal Raymond Burke does not realize that the Catholic identity has been compromised with his belief in there being known salvation outside the Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/cardinal-raymon… OCTOBER 7, 2016 John Allen at Crux says he has no position on this issue: Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism instead of the usual irrational Cushingism ? …More
OCTOBER 8, 2016
Cardinal Raymond Burke does not realize that the Catholic identity has been compromised with his belief in there being known salvation outside the Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/cardinal-raymon…
OCTOBER 7, 2016
John Allen at Crux says he has no position on this issue: Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism instead of the usual irrational Cushingism ? eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/john-allen-at-c…
Spencer and Hahn as Catholics do not affirm the centuries old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So their views on Islam represent those of the liberals eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/spencer-and-hah…
OCTOBER 3, 2016
So we have a choice. There now are two doctrines to choose from.One of them is obviously wrong.The magisterium at some time, past or present, has made a mistake. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/so-we-have-choi…
OCTOBER 16, 2016 Yes when I meet a non Catholic I know that he or she is on the way to Hell since the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus says so. Also the Catechism of Pope Pius X repeats the same message.Similarly Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/yes-when-i-meet… OCTOBER 16, 2016 If the whole world violates the Principle of Non …More
OCTOBER 16, 2016
Yes when I meet a non Catholic I know that he or she is on the way to Hell since the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus says so. Also the Catechism of Pope Pius X repeats the same message.Similarly Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/yes-when-i-meet…
OCTOBER 16, 2016
If the whole world violates the Principle of Non Contradiction then the whole world is wrong.If you and the other sedevacantists assume imaginary cases are physically visible in 2016 then you all are wrong. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/if-whole-world-…
OCTOBER 15, 2016
Finally one has to be resolved within onself.There is the need for personal integrity and coherence.Concience is the voice of God reminding us of the truth eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/finally-one-has…
Since your website suggests that the baptism of desire is an exception to EENS, it would be you who would run into many difficulties in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.This was the error of Archishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX and sedevacantist bishops who have had their religious formation under him. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/since-your-webs…
OCTOBER 12, 2016
Catechism of the Catholic Church reflects Vatican Council II which does not contradict EENS and the old ecclesiology, that of the 16th century missionaries. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/catechism-of-ca…
OCTOBER 12, 2016
The Popes, Card.Ratzinger.Mons.Lefebvre overlooked an objective error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.The bad fruit we see is due to the misinterpretation and not to Vatican Council II per se.It can be changed today. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-popes-cardr…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
I even interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) as being Feeneyite. I use the same reasoning : hypothetical cases are not explicit in the present times. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/i-even-interpre…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
The Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of Pius X says it is necessary. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-letter-of-h…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
For there to be an exception an exception must exist and it must be different. If there is an apple in a box of oranges then the apple is an exception there in that box since it is different -but also since it exists in that box. The baptism of desire without the baptism of water would be an exception to the dogma EENS - but it does not exist in our reality! eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/for-there-to-be…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope Pius X are Feeneyite.They contradict Pope Pius XII,the Archbishop of Boston and the U.S Jesuits.Confusion arises with 29Q which can be interpreted as being visible or invisible eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/vatican-council…
OCTOBER 9, 2016
The Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite.It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and contradicts Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of Boston. See numbers 24Q and 27Q.Confusion today comes with 29Q. It can be interpreted as being visible or invisible. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-catechism-o…
OCTOBER 8, 2016
The sedevacantists must observe that the Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite.So now they know the error. They can correct it.Vatican Council II supports the old ecclesiology. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-sedevacanti…
OCTOBER 8, 2016
The sedevacantists affirm the Catechism of Pope Pius X but not as Feeneyites.They assume that invincible ignorance refers to explicit cases, objectively visible in 2016 and so they are exceptions to that Catechism saying all need to enter the Church for salvation
OCTOBER 16, 2016 Yes when I meet a non Catholic I know that he or she is on the way to Hell since the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus says so. Also the Catechism of Pope Pius X repeats the same message.Similarly Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/yes-when-i-meet… OCTOBER 16, 2016 If the whole world violates the Principle of Non …More
OCTOBER 16, 2016
Yes when I meet a non Catholic I know that he or she is on the way to Hell since the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus says so. Also the Catechism of Pope Pius X repeats the same message.Similarly Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/yes-when-i-meet…
OCTOBER 16, 2016
If the whole world violates the Principle of Non Contradiction then the whole world is wrong.If you and the other sedevacantists assume imaginary cases are physically visible in 2016 then you all are wrong. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/if-whole-world-…
OCTOBER 15, 2016
Finally one has to be resolved within onself.There is the need for personal integrity and coherence.Concience is the voice of God reminding us of the truth eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/finally-one-has…
Since your website suggests that the baptism of desire is an exception to EENS, it would be you who would run into many difficulties in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.This was the error of Archishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX and sedevacantist bishops who have had their religious formation under him. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/since-your-webs…
OCTOBER 12, 2016
Catechism of the Catholic Church reflects Vatican Council II which does not contradict EENS and the old ecclesiology, that of the 16th century missionaries. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/catechism-of-ca…
OCTOBER 12, 2016
The Popes, Card.Ratzinger.Mons.Lefebvre overlooked an objective error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.The bad fruit we see is due to the misinterpretation and not to Vatican Council II per se.It can be changed today. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-popes-cardr…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
I even interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) as being Feeneyite. I use the same reasoning : hypothetical cases are not explicit in the present times. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/i-even-interpre…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
The Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of Pius X says it is necessary. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-letter-of-h…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
For there to be an exception an exception must exist and it must be different. If there is an apple in a box of oranges then the apple is an exception there in that box since it is different -but also since it exists in that box. The baptism of desire without the baptism of water would be an exception to the dogma EENS - but it does not exist in our reality! eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/for-there-to-be…
OCTOBER 10, 2016
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope Pius X are Feeneyite.They contradict Pope Pius XII,the Archbishop of Boston and the U.S Jesuits.Confusion arises with 29Q which can be interpreted as being visible or invisible eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/vatican-council… OCTOBER 9, 2016
The Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite.It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and contradicts Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of Boston. See numbers 24Q and 27Q.Confusion today comes with 29Q. It can be interpreted as being visible or invisible. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-catechism-o…
OCTOBER 8, 2016
The sedevacantists must observe that the Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite.So now they know the error. They can correct it.Vatican Council II supports the old ecclesiology. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-sedevacanti…
OCTOBER 8, 2016
The sedevacantists affirm the Catechism of Pope Pius X but not as Feeneyites.They assume that invincible ignorance refers to explicit cases, objectively visible in 2016 and so they are exceptions to that Catechism saying all need to enter the Church for salvation
OCTOBER 31, 2016 Cardinal Ratzinger did not know that with Feeneyism Vatican Council II does not have a hermeneutic of rupture ? eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/cardinal-ratzin… OCTOBER 30, 2016 With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/with-feeneyite-… OCTOBER 30, 2016 Feeneyite Vatican Council II says …More
If all of them would accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney then Vatican Council II would pastorally be in harmony with Tradition eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/if-all-of-them-…
OCTOBER 29, 2016
If we go back to the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney then pastorally Vatican Council II will have the hermeneutic of continuity eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/if-we-go-back-t…
If they would believe Cardinal Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes : Cardinal Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/if-they-believe…
OCTOBER 27, 2016
Until Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider affirm Feeneyism as a salvation theology they will not be able to interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity.Vatican Council II will continue to be a rupture with Tradition eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/until-cardinal-…
OCTOBER 27, 2016
The difference between me and others is that I interpret Vatican Council II at face-value, according to the text,while the others interpret the text with an inference. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-difference-…
So if Cardinal Burke can accept the innovation and reject the past magisterium and support the present magisterium, Catholics could then ask why cannot they also abort, since one does not have to follow the moral teachings of only the Catholic Church to go to Heaven? eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/so-if-cardinal-…
Pope Francis affirms 'the absoluteness and uniqueness' of Jesus which is common for him in the Lutheran and Pentecostal communities too : not necessary to convert eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/pope-francis-af…
Atila S. Guimarães made a mistake in the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus : with the same irrational reasoning Vatican Council II emerges as a break with Tradition for him eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/atila-s-guimara…
OCTOBER 20, 2016
Why is Vatican Council II not fundamentalist for La Stampa?Archbishop Guido Pozzo does not state that Vatican Council II is fundamentalist.Even Catholic conservatives, traditionalists and La Stampa journalists are not aware that Vatican Council II in itself is fundamentalist eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/why-is-vatican-…
I am calling attention to the irrational theology.One can continue to accept all the teachings of the Church, all the dogmas, without using the irrational theology. Change the theology and you change Vatican Council II, change the theology and you change the Church, you take it back to its rational and traditional teachings. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/i-am-calling-at…
November 6, 2016 When Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition and there are no 'ambiguities' in it, then the Novus Ordo Mass theologically should not be a rupture with Tradition. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/when-vatican-co… November 5, 2016 So this is why Vatican Council II for you is a rupture with Tradtiion. It is a rupture with St. Ignatius of Antoich because of the false …More
November 6, 2016
When Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition and there are no 'ambiguities' in it, then the Novus Ordo Mass theologically should not be a rupture with Tradition. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/when-vatican-co…
November 5, 2016
So this is why Vatican Council II for you is a rupture with Tradtiion. It is a rupture with St. Ignatius of Antoich because of the false premise, the irrational premise eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/so-this-is-why-…
No doctrine was changed in the text of Vatican Council II.However an irrational theology was used.With this theology the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is a foundation dogma for other doctrine( ecumenism etc) was discarded eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/no-doctrine-was…
November 5, 2016
The ambiguities in Vatican Council II are there ONLY when an irrational premise and conclusion is employed
Vatican Council II is the only Council in which an objective mistake was made and was approved by the magisterium. Invisible cases ( baptism of desire etc) were assumed to be visible
Tim Sebastian,Conflict Zone interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and conclusion : so he refers to ' the church's doctrinal changes introduced by the Second Vatican Council' eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/tim-sebastianco…
November 4, 2016
Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and conclusion : there is an option, a rational conclusion of which he is unaware of. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/bishop-bernard-…
October 31, 2016 Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop Lefebvre did not know : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/cardinal-ratzin… November 1, 2016 Sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada have still to say : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II …More
October 31, 2016
Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop Lefebvre did not know : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Church
Sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada have still to say : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/sedevacantists-…
November 1, 2016 Atila S. Guimarães and Robert de Mattei wrote books on Vatican Council II not knowing that with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Churcheucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/atila-s-guimara…
November 1, 2016
Mons.Guido Pozzo, Secretary,Ecclesia Dei will not say it : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Church
November 3, 2016 Could you identify the irrational premise and conclusion for me ? / Do you agree that there can be an interpretation of Vatican Council II with or without an irrational premise and conclusion? eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/could-you-ident…
In the past the Catholic Church was always Christocentric with an exclusivist ecclesiology.With the innovation of the false premise and conclusion the Catholic Church only remains Christocentric and so no more supports an ecumenism of return. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/in-past-catholi…
November 1, 2016 There can only be a clarification if they agree that there can be an interpretation of Vatican Council II with or without an irrational premise and conclusion? This is the central thesis of what I am saying.
November 1, 2016 So we have two conclusions and two interpretations.One has to be correct and the other wrong.Do you think Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops used the irrational premise and conclusion? eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/so-we-have-two-…
November 1, 2016 Bishop Bernard Tisseur de Mallerais repeats the error of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre: he assumes Nostra Aetate contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/bishop-bernard-…
There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and once the error is identified and avoided, the interpretation of the Council radically changes.There is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II ' excuse anymore eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/there-is-mistak…
NOVEMBER 29, 2016
So it is only by using an irrationality that the present magisterium can re-interpret magisterial documents and say Vatican Council II indicates all Jews and Muslims in Italy do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016 eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/so-it-only-by-u…
NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Yet it is with this reasoning that cardinals Ratzinger,Kasper and other liberals interpret Vatican Council II. They use an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion.They with their executive power in the Vatican, they call it magisterial eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/yet-it-is-with-…
NOVEMBER 23, 2016
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have set a precedent for all religious communities.They have announced that they accept Vatican Council II without Rahnerian theology.This is extra ordinary. Since they are not denying the Council and neither are they denying Tradition eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-franciscan-…
NOVEMBER 21, 2016 Can the SSPX accept Vatican Council II like the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to get canonical status ? : No one tells the pope that he is interpreting Vatican Council II with bad philosophy and bad theology which has now been exposed
NOVEMBER 20, 2016 When we get rid of the Rahnerian theology to interpret Vatican Council II then Catholics in general can know the importance of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation : Feast of Christ the King
NOVEMBER 14, 2016 Don Francesco Riscossa has made an objective error. Lumen Gentium 8 refers to a hypothetical case and so it is not relevant or an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which he has cited in part one of the conference.
Don Allessandro Minutella does not deny it : there is no theology in Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and an ecumenism of return, Vatican Council II is in accord with the Lefbrists and 'integralists' whom he criticizes in the video eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/frlessandro-min…
NOVEMBER 8, 2016
Today the magisterium wants the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objective in the present times and they are not doing so.Neither would I. eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/today-magisteri…
NOVEMBER 8, 2016
Once we avoid the new theology, with the irrational premise then the conclusion is traditional. We have the old ecclesiology and upon it we base the teaching on religious liberty, ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/once-we-avoid-n…
NOVEMBER 8, 2016
Once you have identified the new theology and avoided it,it is possible to view Vatican Council II in the light of Tradition. We would be back to the old ecclesiology at any Mass eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/once-you-have-i…
