The positive outcome would be for people to stop destroying lives and wrecking ecosystems. How can you miss such an obvious conclusion? Instead you are saying that it is my fault for pointing out that negative behavior causes negative consequenses. Well, it does. Everyone knows this. We just didn't always know what to do. Now it is becoming apparent that so much destruction is only counterproductive, yet it is not being talked about in this context, so I am bringing it up. This is a positive thing. Get it?

Besides, you started by saying of me "Just say it for everyones sake...", which states explicitely that you are putting words in my mouth. Were you not aware of what your own words implied?

No, the remark is still there, lordy:

"Someone else comes to mind that has a disgust for the human race ,and a hatred for the Priesthood

Behold the Cross of the Lord! fly ye powers of darkness ! The Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David has conquerred. Alleluia!"

This is an ad hominem, and it says more about you, rhemes1582, than me (that you are the one full of disgust and hatred). I am the opposite of what you are projecting onto me. I am advocating for the truth.

The news story is about the church making changes in response to sex scandals. My commenting on that is no more hateful than the report itself. Get a grip, people.

First of all, you are putting words in my mouth and then criticizing them with your own bias, as well as taking points I have made elsewhere out of context (ad hominem). My comment on this topic means what it says. Furthermore, my point was that the human race would be better off if it was universally pro-life for all sentient beings throughout our life-spans, because long term studies show that people live longer without eating animals, and that it takes more natural resources to kill and process all of those sentient beings than to grow food. How is this not a positive message (besides that people are set in their ways)?

My point was that they obviously could not tell who the sex offenders were until after the fact, so if gender was a common factor between those who "messed up", then excluding members of that gender from positions in which they could take advantage at all would be an extreme but sure way to "safeguard the truth", as it were. Maybe the church should at least have males and females share each leadership role in order to oversee each other's actions, and show that the church takes solving this problem seriously.

"There simply isn't anything close"? Yes there is, in true terms of "pro life", there is more than you care to discuss:

"In the United States, around nine billion animals are slaughtered every year (this includes about 150.4 million cattle, bison, sheep, hogs, and goats and 8.9 billion chickens, turkeys, and ducks) in 5,700 slaughterhouses and processing plants employing 527,000 workers; in 2009, 13,450,000 long tons (13,670,000 t) of beef were consumed in the U.S. alone. In Canada, 650 million animals are killed annually. In the European Union, the annual figure is 300 million cattle, sheep, and pigs, and four billion chickens."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaughterhouse