Conception to Birth -- Visualized
Conception to Birth -- Visualized Image-maker Alexander Tsiaras shares a powerful medical visualization, showing human development from conception to birth and beyond. (Some graphic images.)More
Conception to Birth -- Visualized
Image-maker Alexander Tsiaras shares a powerful medical visualization, showing human development from conception to birth and beyond. (Some graphic images.)
Image-maker Alexander Tsiaras shares a powerful medical visualization, showing human development from conception to birth and beyond. (Some graphic images.)
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Once again, soundingjoy, even if humans are your only consideration, it is in our best interest to preserve lives, and help ourselves in the process. The astounding biology of this video is not unique to humans, nor is the sanctity of life on this planet.
Like I mentioned, there are ongoing long-term studies of humans, which indicate significant health benefits and longevity resulting from life-…More
Once again, soundingjoy, even if humans are your only consideration, it is in our best interest to preserve lives, and help ourselves in the process. The astounding biology of this video is not unique to humans, nor is the sanctity of life on this planet.
Like I mentioned, there are ongoing long-term studies of humans, which indicate significant health benefits and longevity resulting from life-sustaining dietary practices.
Like I mentioned, there are ongoing long-term studies of humans, which indicate significant health benefits and longevity resulting from life-sustaining dietary practices.
soundingjoy
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I agree with you Rhemes1582, well said. When Adam and Eve sinned, death came to all things, including the earth. Earth was made for man, not man for earth. While we must be responsible about tending the earth, saving the lives of unborn children, and the souls of men are much more important to God, I assure you. It seems the cart is before the horse. Should we then use the aborted fetuses to fertilize …More
I agree with you Rhemes1582, well said. When Adam and Eve sinned, death came to all things, including the earth. Earth was made for man, not man for earth. While we must be responsible about tending the earth, saving the lives of unborn children, and the souls of men are much more important to God, I assure you. It seems the cart is before the horse. Should we then use the aborted fetuses to fertilize your ecosystems? Nature, while created by God, is not God. He alone places above all, man, created in His image. Would that we would grieve over the millions of unborn children, then perhaps God would heal our land.
This is about human development, and I am saying that human development does not occur independently of all other life on this planet.
Like I said, humans will live longer and healthier lives by not killing and processing billions of other sentient beings each year.
Mr. rhemes1582, can you read the whole thing, or do you stop after finding a word that you can pounce on?
Other than ignoring my point …More
This is about human development, and I am saying that human development does not occur independently of all other life on this planet.
Like I said, humans will live longer and healthier lives by not killing and processing billions of other sentient beings each year.
Mr. rhemes1582, can you read the whole thing, or do you stop after finding a word that you can pounce on?
Other than ignoring my point, you are clearly harping on the semantics of two words which you are taking out of context, even after I restated the message to show that they were not pivotal to its meaning. Your bias is the only thing that you are making clear. What I said is true, either way.
Like I said, humans will live longer and healthier lives by not killing and processing billions of other sentient beings each year.
Mr. rhemes1582, can you read the whole thing, or do you stop after finding a word that you can pounce on?
Other than ignoring my point, you are clearly harping on the semantics of two words which you are taking out of context, even after I restated the message to show that they were not pivotal to its meaning. Your bias is the only thing that you are making clear. What I said is true, either way.
Correction, I meant to say sentient instead of sentinent, as I said before with links:
Conception is a miracle for all sentient beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who …More
Correction, I meant to say sentient instead of sentinent, as I said before with links:
Conception is a miracle for all sentient beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter.
While I am elucidating, I will reiterate that it would not only be a good outcome for animals and the planet, but for people themselves to appreciate life.
Conception is a miracle for all sentient beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter.
While I am elucidating, I will reiterate that it would not only be a good outcome for animals and the planet, but for people themselves to appreciate life.
4 more comments from Vegan
I can also restate my original remark with more positive semantics, for the sake of conveying optimism:
Conception is a miracle for all sentinent beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are …More
I can also restate my original remark with more positive semantics, for the sake of conveying optimism:
Conception is a miracle for all sentinent beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter.
There you have it.
Conception is a miracle for all sentinent beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter.
There you have it.
The positive outcome would be for people to stop destroying lives and wrecking ecosystems. How can you miss such an obvious conclusion? Instead you are saying that it is my fault for pointing out that negative behavior causes negative consequenses. Well, it does. Everyone knows this. We just didn't always know what to do. Now it is becoming apparent that so much destruction is only counterproductive …More
The positive outcome would be for people to stop destroying lives and wrecking ecosystems. How can you miss such an obvious conclusion? Instead you are saying that it is my fault for pointing out that negative behavior causes negative consequenses. Well, it does. Everyone knows this. We just didn't always know what to do. Now it is becoming apparent that so much destruction is only counterproductive, yet it is not being talked about in this context, so I am bringing it up. This is a positive thing. Get it?
Besides, you started by saying of me "Just say it for everyones sake...", which states explicitely that you are putting words in my mouth. Were you not aware of what your own words implied?
Besides, you started by saying of me "Just say it for everyones sake...", which states explicitely that you are putting words in my mouth. Were you not aware of what your own words implied?
First of all, you are putting words in my mouth and then criticizing them with your own bias, as well as taking points I have made elsewhere out of context (ad hominem). My comment on this topic means what it says. Furthermore, my point was that the human race would be better off if it was universally pro-life for all sentient beings throughout our life-spans, because long term studies show that …More
First of all, you are putting words in my mouth and then criticizing them with your own bias, as well as taking points I have made elsewhere out of context (ad hominem). My comment on this topic means what it says. Furthermore, my point was that the human race would be better off if it was universally pro-life for all sentient beings throughout our life-spans, because long term studies show that people live longer without eating animals, and that it takes more natural resources to kill and process all of those sentient beings than to grow food. How is this not a positive message (besides that people are set in their ways)?
It isn't just us, but all sentient beings for which conception is a miracle. Humans destroy more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while wrecking ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter.