Outcome of Francis' Term: "The Church Is in Ruins" - Schneider
Archbishop Schneider and Cardinal Mueller, present themselves as the “good guys”, but the truth is that they are every much a part of the problem. Both of these men support Vatican II. Yes, they say that since they only support the “lite” version, the one which they claim can be “interpreted” in the “right” way, they’re really on the side of God. That is utter nonsense. There is no “lite” or …More
Archbishop Schneider and Cardinal Mueller, present themselves as the “good guys”, but the truth is that they are every much a part of the problem. Both of these men support Vatican II. Yes, they say that since they only support the “lite” version, the one which they claim can be “interpreted” in the “right” way, they’re really on the side of God. That is utter nonsense. There is no “lite” or right version of evil. And if one is unable to recognize that the Second Vatican Council is evil in the extreme then they are either spiritually blind or spiritually compromised.
The only prelate who has had the insight and courage to acknowledge his past errors of supporting the Council and has now come out clearly in condemnation of it has been Archbishop Vigano. But the world can see where that got him. He’s now forced to stay in hiding just to survive. Certainly the so-called “conservative” bishops like Schneider, Mueller, Burke, Cordileone, etc. see where that got him as well, so they carefully keep their heads down lest they draw too much negative attention.
Yes, Francis is a Modernist of the first order, and is certainly the worst one in the line of post-Conciliar Modernist popes since the Council. But if one believes that Francis and his cronies are the heart of the problem then they’ve missed an important part of this story. Francis will be gone relatively soon, and his replacement will likely be as bad if not far worse. So unless and until many of the prelates can muster up the spiritual courage to come out in opposition to Vatican II, the Church (and many souls) will continuing spiraling downward.
The only prelate who has had the insight and courage to acknowledge his past errors of supporting the Council and has now come out clearly in condemnation of it has been Archbishop Vigano. But the world can see where that got him. He’s now forced to stay in hiding just to survive. Certainly the so-called “conservative” bishops like Schneider, Mueller, Burke, Cordileone, etc. see where that got him as well, so they carefully keep their heads down lest they draw too much negative attention.
Yes, Francis is a Modernist of the first order, and is certainly the worst one in the line of post-Conciliar Modernist popes since the Council. But if one believes that Francis and his cronies are the heart of the problem then they’ve missed an important part of this story. Francis will be gone relatively soon, and his replacement will likely be as bad if not far worse. So unless and until many of the prelates can muster up the spiritual courage to come out in opposition to Vatican II, the Church (and many souls) will continuing spiraling downward.
Franics Appointed Mariana Mazzucato - Atheist, WEF Member and Abortion Activist
Who is this very confused woman? Also, what is the back story on the vid itself?
Last Gag: Francis Starts Commission for Proclaiming Non-Catholic "Saints"
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori--You were doing alright when you started out with: “All of the Popes who were made Saints after Vatican II were not Saints”.
You should have stopped before you typed: “John Paul II perhaps was”.
You should have stopped before you typed: “John Paul II perhaps was”.
Bye Christmas: Archdiocese Cancelled ALL Eucharists
1395 Rue Notre Dame
St-Césaire, QC, J0L 1T0
St-Césaire, QC, J0L 1T0
Gay Blasphemy Legislation: Catholic Publisher Sentenced for Things He Didn’t Write
In light of Vladimir Putin’s recent comments condemning homosexuals, maybe the Leonine prayers should be said for the conversion of Italy, rather than Russia.
Paganism Is Within Today’s Church Itself. By Father Joseph Ratzinger
John Cassini—I’ve heard that representation in the past, namely that there were only a few hundred of the bishops who were still “conservative” at the time of the Council. Yet, I’ve never been able to find any authoritive source for it. Can you help me out in that regard. I would greatly appreciate it.
We Must Obey Francis - Especially When It Comes To the Traditional Latin Mass. By Father Franz Paprovich*
I suspect you meant Bull, not Bubble?
Oldest Baby of the World: Molly Was Born When She was 27
Has the Catholic Church spoken on the morality of this issue of implanting a frozen embryo in the womb of a potential surrogate mother?
McCarrick Report Is Mainly About Discrediting Archbishop Viganò
Unfortunately, Sandro Magister was rubbing his hands with glee as he pointed out the criticism (false though it was) of Archbishop Vigano. Yet, Magister failed to point out that the fact that Pope Francis was found to have been well aware of what was going with McCarrick––the very point being made by Vigano, and the reason why he had to go into hiding for his safety.
Francis Thanks John Paul II for Having Questioned Primacy of Peter
Because the Catholic Church is the one true Church. The SSPX does not oppose the Church or the Holy Father. The SSPX simply wants the leaders of Rome to follow the true teachings of the Church. It is only after that is assured will they want to reconcile. Absolute not under the current climate.
May I suggest you read the following explanation from an SSPX priest who lays out the issue quite clearly. …More
Because the Catholic Church is the one true Church. The SSPX does not oppose the Church or the Holy Father. The SSPX simply wants the leaders of Rome to follow the true teachings of the Church. It is only after that is assured will they want to reconcile. Absolute not under the current climate.
May I suggest you read the following explanation from an SSPX priest who lays out the issue quite clearly. bit.ly/3gCYlNs
May I suggest you read the following explanation from an SSPX priest who lays out the issue quite clearly. bit.ly/3gCYlNs
Cardinal Burke Closes the Stable Door After the Cattle Has Run Away
Cardinal Burke is a Modernist fraud! He's actually the worse kind. He has led many faithful conservative Catholics to continue following the false teachings of Vatican II by pretending he's a faithful Catholic. One day he will be exposed for what he is.
Francis Thanks John Paul II for Having Questioned Primacy of Peter
Today, it is only the SSPX that follows all of the true teachings of the Church. Understandably, they see their mission as that of preserving the Catholic Faith in its fullness and purity, to teach its truths, and to diffuse its virtues, especially through the Roman Catholic priesthood.
That mission, of course, does not include finding fault with the almost countless number of Modernist practices …More
Today, it is only the SSPX that follows all of the true teachings of the Church. Understandably, they see their mission as that of preserving the Catholic Faith in its fullness and purity, to teach its truths, and to diffuse its virtues, especially through the Roman Catholic priesthood.
That mission, of course, does not include finding fault with the almost countless number of Modernist practices that have become an acceptable part of the modern Catholic’s life today. And besides, the heretical practices of Pope John Paul II, two of which I’ve already mentioned (Universalism and Indifferentism) need no modern-day confirmation.
But do understand that the Catholic Church established by Jesus Christ continues today exactly as He established her two centuries ago. Sadly enough, however, the modernist leaders of Vatican II hijacked His Church and have led countless souls away from His Truth. Most of the followers of the new religion established by those false leaders accept it as being that of the true Catholic Church. It is not. It is a counterfeit religion. They have the buildings and the worldly support, but they do not have the true faith. It is only those who continue to follow all of the true teachings of the Catholic Church that do.
So yes, the “church” of the religion that you choose to follow has not condemned Pope John Paul II and never will. But their raising of him to so-called their new sainthood is merely emblematic of far more serious errors being perpetrated and practiced by the modern popes and bishops today. And while I have no interest in debating the general issue with you, I would commend to your reading any number of publications that have been written over the past 50 years that spell out the issues giving rise to this division quite well. You would be wise to avail yourself of those, and if you were actually interested, I’d be more than happy to provide you with a list of at least a few.
That mission, of course, does not include finding fault with the almost countless number of Modernist practices that have become an acceptable part of the modern Catholic’s life today. And besides, the heretical practices of Pope John Paul II, two of which I’ve already mentioned (Universalism and Indifferentism) need no modern-day confirmation.
But do understand that the Catholic Church established by Jesus Christ continues today exactly as He established her two centuries ago. Sadly enough, however, the modernist leaders of Vatican II hijacked His Church and have led countless souls away from His Truth. Most of the followers of the new religion established by those false leaders accept it as being that of the true Catholic Church. It is not. It is a counterfeit religion. They have the buildings and the worldly support, but they do not have the true faith. It is only those who continue to follow all of the true teachings of the Catholic Church that do.
So yes, the “church” of the religion that you choose to follow has not condemned Pope John Paul II and never will. But their raising of him to so-called their new sainthood is merely emblematic of far more serious errors being perpetrated and practiced by the modern popes and bishops today. And while I have no interest in debating the general issue with you, I would commend to your reading any number of publications that have been written over the past 50 years that spell out the issues giving rise to this division quite well. You would be wise to avail yourself of those, and if you were actually interested, I’d be more than happy to provide you with a list of at least a few.
No Coronavirus Obsession in Lourdes
None were shown kneeling. Sad.
One PiusX Bishop Is a Nursing Case
Without the background that gave rise to his departure, that would seem like a positive step. But is there any reason to believe that the same issues will not arise once again? I would think that the movement would, of necessity, come from Bishop Williamson's camp. I've heard or read nothing along that line.
Francis Thanks John Paul II for Having Questioned Primacy of Peter
Respectfully, you might learn more about what Pope John Paul II promoted and believed in (such as the heresies of Universalism and Indifferentism) before referring to him as "the Great".
Apocalyptic: Italy And Rome Close All Churches Even For Private Prayer
SSPX is not closing any chapels. Maybe some of the NO will find their way back to Mass of All Ages?
Ruini Commission: Medjugorje Seers Are Not Mature In Faith, One Is Notorious Liar
Interesting, for the better part of 2000 years receiving Communion on the tongue was a way of life Catholics, and now it's a health issue? Are "modern" Catholics really so easily led away from Church teaching? Tragic.
Francis Angry at Italian Bishops
If only the problem were only Pope Francis. Sadly, it is far worse than one, unfaithful man. Virtually every bishop and many many priests have been infected with the Modernist heresy promoted during the Second Vatican Council.
We will not conquer this diabolic scourge by removing this one man, or even by removing the scores of cardinals and bishops who are leading this heresy. Those men will only …More
If only the problem were only Pope Francis. Sadly, it is far worse than one, unfaithful man. Virtually every bishop and many many priests have been infected with the Modernist heresy promoted during the Second Vatican Council.
We will not conquer this diabolic scourge by removing this one man, or even by removing the scores of cardinals and bishops who are leading this heresy. Those men will only be replaced by similarly flawed characters who would likely be even worse.
The only chance for the Church at this time in history is for the faithful priests and laity to return to all of the true teachings of the Church that were extant prior to the Council. Today, those teachings are rare, but can be found in the chapels of the SSPX.
We will not conquer this diabolic scourge by removing this one man, or even by removing the scores of cardinals and bishops who are leading this heresy. Those men will only be replaced by similarly flawed characters who would likely be even worse.
The only chance for the Church at this time in history is for the faithful priests and laity to return to all of the true teachings of the Church that were extant prior to the Council. Today, those teachings are rare, but can be found in the chapels of the SSPX.