By Dr. Rafael Xavier Gonzalez There was a recent debate between https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPyHjZILcBU) which put the Eastern Orthodox position on the defensive (they are usually on the offensive). The question was if the Eastern Orthodox church is the “One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church”, the four marks of the Church established by the Council of Nicaea (325 AD), from the Nicene Creed, and affirmed and further developed by the First Council of Constantinople (381 AD). These marks are the essential characteristics of the Church as founded by Jesus Christ Our Lord. The problem is that in the history of the Church, the Roman Catholic Church, the same concrete claims of disunity can be applied to it, like the great schisms, Avignon and the Western Schism come to mind. Disunity existed on the surface while the true Church remained united in a more profound sense that transcends the mere concrete events in history (in another article I will address the meaning of the mark of …
Oh yes, let us not react! That would be…reactionary! That’s bad, you know! What we must do is not react. “We must join with Sauron! It would be wise, my friend.” Let us pay no mind to St. Pius X who counseled us not to watch evil advance while doing nothing. Did not God put us here in this particular time precisely so that we would be reactionary to the evils unleashed in the Church and world by Vatican II? Which lord does one serve then, who counsels us not to be reactionary???