+Williamson comments on +Vigano’s June 28 letter (“J’accuse”).
stmarcelinitiative.com
VIGANO COMMENTARY – Just another WordPress site
Last week these “Comments” (July 13, # 887) gave a summary of Archbishop Vigano’s June 28 long justification of his decision not to respond to a Newchurch …
Viganò’s 1st sermon following “excommunication” (dated July 7, but just released today, July 16).
exsurgedomine.it
In Sanguine tuo
In Sanguine tuo In Sanguine tuo Homily on the external Solemnity of the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ Rev 5:9-10 Dear brothers and sisters, First of all, allow me to share …
Vigano on the indult (and a warning to the SSPX): “ If our Ministry could be “tolerated” in some way, it would mean that it is ineffective and …More
Vigano on the indult (and a warning to the SSPX): “ If our Ministry could be “tolerated” in some way, it would mean that it is ineffective and compromised, if only because of the implicit acceptance of an impossible coexistence between opposites, of ahermeneutic of continuityin which there is room for truth and error, light and darkness, God and Belial.”
VIGANO COUNTER-ATTACKS – Just another WordPress site
Summoned by Rome to appear before a Newchurch court on June 28 to answer accusations of “schism,” the heroic defender of the Faith, Archbishop Vigano …
“The authority of Our Apostolic See has determined that the bishop, cleric, or simple Christian who had been deposed or excommunicated by Nestorius or his followers, after the latter began to preach …More
“The authority of Our Apostolic See has determined that the bishop, cleric, or simple Christian who had been deposed or excommunicated by Nestorius or his followers, after the latter began to preach heresy, shall not be considered deposed or excommunicated. For he who had defected from the faith with such preachings, cannot depose or remove anyone whatsoever.”2 What is the difference between an excommunicate and an open heretic?
This heavily implies ipso facto loss of office for public heretics (In addition to proving the “excommunications” of Lefebvre, the 4 SSPX bishops, and …More
This heavily implies ipso facto loss of office for public heretics (In addition to proving the “excommunications” of Lefebvre, the 4 SSPX bishops, and Vigano worthless).
The BBC is reporting that just prior to Trump taking the stage, rally attendees alerted police regarding a man crawling on a roof holding a rifle. Police …More
The BBC is reporting that just prior to Trump taking the stage, rally attendees alerted police regarding a man crawling on a roof holding a rifle. Police did nothing.
The error here is the conflating of personal opinions and legitimate discourse with an official position of an organization. Some official publications …More
The error here is the conflating of personal opinions and legitimate discourse with an official position of an organization. Some official publications where the SSPX and Archbishop Lefebvre expressed their opposition to Sedevacantism include (according to ChatGPT): 1. “Open Letter to Confused Catholics” (1986) by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - In this book, Lefebvre criticizes the post-Vatican II reforms but maintains that the pope is still the legitimate pontiff. 2. “The Mystery of the Church and the Pope” (1982) - A collection of texts and conferences by Archbishop Lefebvre, where he discusses the crisis in the Church and the role of the pope. 3. “They Have Uncrowned Him” (1988) by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - This book elaborates on his views about the Church’s crisis and reiterates his recognition of the legitimacy of the recent popes. 4. SSPX’s official publications such as “Fideliter” magazine - Various issues of this periodical included articles and interviews where Lefebvre and …More
On whether SSPX priests should discuss the pope question with the faithful and educate them that sedevacantism is a possibility: “ Well. I told the …More
On whether SSPX priests should discuss the pope question with the faithful and educate them that sedevacantism is a possibility: “ Well. I told the priests, in Paris, when I gathered them, and then to you, I had already told you, I said: ‘I think that, little by little, we must still enlighten the faithful a little…’ I do not say that it should be done brutally, and throw this to the faithful to frighten them… No. But I still think that it is precisely a matter of faith. The faithful must not lose the faith. We are responsible for keeping the faith of the faithful, protecting it. They will lose the faith… even our traditionalists.” That’s a rather striking contrast to the SSPX position since Lefebvre’s death, in which any discussion of the subject has run in the exact opposite direction (ie., dogmatic anti sedevacantism).
@philosopher- It might be more productive if you could even attempt an explanation of HOW/WHY he’s wrong, instead of gratuitously asserting it (because …More
@philosopher- It might be more productive if you could even attempt an explanation of HOW/WHY he’s wrong, instead of gratuitously asserting it (because as the maxim says, “That which is alleged without proof can be dismissed without proof”).
Bishop Williamson's so called resistance SSPX is a very tiny group. Moreover, he has been excommunicated again for ordaining more bishops to his small …More
Bishop Williamson's so called resistance SSPX is a very tiny group. Moreover, he has been excommunicated again for ordaining more bishops to his small fractured group. I'll contue to support the SSPX and not Bishop Williamson - he's wrong on the Holocaust, and he's wrong on Bishop Fellay and the SSPX.
Well, what did they expect? For people who made the wrong choice to leave Lefebvre, this, however, served as a good lesson. Perhaps some of them later …More
Well, what did they expect? For people who made the wrong choice to leave Lefebvre, this, however, served as a good lesson. Perhaps some of them later regretted their choice.
Le Vatican excommunie Mgr Viganò Le Palais du Saint-Office, siège du Dicastère pour la doctrine de la foi Un communiqué du Dicastère pour la doctrine de la foi a …
Los Santos “Descanonizados” Por La Iglesia Conciliar
Traducción del Artículo escrito por Nicholas D.C. Wansbutter, Esq. para DURENDAL. La fiesta de San Crispín, una fecha que según Shakespeare, marcaría …
Earlier today the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) announced that former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganó has been …
Mel these "reforms" started before Vatican II. All the heresies the Church has battled against through the centuries were destroyed by saintly Popes. …More
Mel these "reforms" started before Vatican II. All the heresies the Church has battled against through the centuries were destroyed by saintly Popes. However the difference is that the Church hierarchy are cowards, except for a few.
This man knows way more then he letting on .Too bad he has to be drunk to say it .Red sea pedestrians .When they convert It will be the greatest act of …More
This man knows way more then he letting on .Too bad he has to be drunk to say it .Red sea pedestrians .When they convert It will be the greatest act of mercy in salvation history
The caption reads, "Help yourself, and make a donation to the memory of His Excellency, Bishop Vitus Hounder." The priest who sends this to me says it seems that this appeal and commemorative magazine …More
The caption reads, "Help yourself, and make a donation to the memory of His Excellency, Bishop Vitus Hounder." The priest who sends this to me says it seems that this appeal and commemorative magazine appears at the front door of all SSPX chapels (not sure in which districts though). Shameless posturing for Roman consumption: "We really, really love Novus Ordo bishops.” [Click on the icon in the upper-right corner of the pic to expand it, to see the whole message]
Update: “A member of The Catacombs [forum] wrote that the SSPX is more than just passively putting out a collection box for this purpose in one chapel …More
Update: “A member of The Catacombs [forum] wrote that the SSPX is more than just passively putting out a collection box for this purpose in one chapel - they are actively soliciting donations for this 'memorial': the SSPX chapels in Munich (there may be several other chapels doing the same but this area it was confirmed) are sending out fliers in the mail seeking funds to honor +Huonder with a memorial. Why so much effort to honor a Novus Ordo bishop who never renounced Vatican II and it's errors, never renounced the New Mass. Perhaps it is a gesture to please their new masters in Rome? Or perhaps it was 'suggested/requested' of them and to keep the 'favors' they have been receiving from Francis et al., they must comply?” SSPX Erecting +Hounder Memorial
In French, the brochure says that donations are be made in Bishop Huonder’s memory, with the proceeds to be sent, at his specific request, to Society …More
In French, the brochure says that donations are be made in Bishop Huonder’s memory, with the proceeds to be sent, at his specific request, to Society chapels. The brochure says nothing about donating to construct a memorial. This is untrue. Sean, please correct or delete this post as your statements are calumnious in nature.
Collection of Writings from Current and Former SSPX Priests and Allied Religious Against an Agreement with Unconverted Rome (Front/back matter and annotations incomplete, but collection of letters is …More
Collection of Writings from Current and Former SSPX Priests and Allied Religious Against an Agreement with Unconverted Rome (Front/back matter and annotations incomplete, but collection of letters is complete). Completed hard copy available later this year.
Excerpts from a 2019 article by Dr. John Lamont, who is neither sedevacantist nor Resistance, on why the SSPX is mute on Roman modernism (by 2024 you could also use this same explanation to understand …More
Excerpts from a 2019 article by Dr. John Lamont, who is neither sedevacantist nor Resistance, on why the SSPX is mute on Roman modernism (by 2024 you could also use this same explanation to understand its silence -then recent distancing from- +Vigano, or its scandalous response not to “mindlessly attack the bishop” of Linz for erecting a horrendously blasphemous statue of our Blessed Mother): "It is true that Bishop Fellay is no longer the superior general of the SSPX. The character of the new leadership of the Society may give a clue to the position that the SSPX has taken toward the Open Letter. The current superior general of the Society is Fr. Davide Pagliarani, who was the superior of the SSPX seminary in La Reja, Argentina from 2012 until his election in 2018. The new assistants to the superior general are Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta and Fr. Christian Bouchacourt. Bishop de Gallareta was also a rector of the Society’s seminary in Argentina. Fr. Bouchacourt served as the district …More
A recent article by Mr. Morrison over at The Remnant supposes that the reason Francis’s forthcoming suppression of all diocesan TLMs will exclude the suppression of the ex-Ecclesia Dei institutes, is …More
A recent article by Mr. Morrison over at The Remnant supposes that the reason Francis’s forthcoming suppression of all diocesan TLMs will exclude the suppression of the ex-Ecclesia Dei institutes, is because he must first show the false sects who will collaborate with him in the making of the universal antichrist religion that he himself can be tolerant of dissent within his own church. I’d argue, on the contrary, that this is a fundamental misreading of the very purpose and role the ex-Ecclesia Dei institutes play in containing and reeducating would-be trads for their conciliar masters: These institutes are not set up to tolerate integral traditionalism, but to dissolve it (why do you think the indult and/or Ecclesia Dei chapels are always so proximate to SSPX venues?). Said differently, it’s not that Francis is willing to tolerate Traditionalists within a corner of the synodal/conciliar church (eg., to show other false religions its tolerance or ecumenical good will), but that bringing …More
Bruceph Mildur
philosopher
Maria delos Angeles
