Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Bishop Strickland: Vatican Engages in Betrayal of the Century
Yet he himself defends Vatican 2, says the new Mass, etc, etc.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
St. Trump the Great:
1) Sleeps with porn queens
2) Releases the clotshot
3) Promotes IVF
4) Promotes gay marriage
5) Expands GOP abortion acceptance
6) Declares himself no Christian
7) Controlled by _ews
8) Defender of contraception
9) Multiple “marriages”
10) Said Epstein was a good guy.More
St. Trump the Great:
1) Sleeps with porn queens
2) Releases the clotshot
3) Promotes IVF
4) Promotes gay marriage
5) Expands GOP abortion acceptance
6) Declares himself no Christian
7) Controlled by _ews
8) Defender of contraception
9) Multiple “marriages”
10) Said Epstein was a good guy.
1) Sleeps with porn queens
2) Releases the clotshot
3) Promotes IVF
4) Promotes gay marriage
5) Expands GOP abortion acceptance
6) Declares himself no Christian
7) Controlled by _ews
8) Defender of contraception
9) Multiple “marriages”
10) Said Epstein was a good guy.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Canada
…which really means “his kind of Christianity” conquered nothing. In fact, it means he’s no Christian at all, whereas all the deeds he recounts were accomplished by Catholics.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Is the legitimacy of a universally and peacefully accepted pope a matter of faith? John of St Thomas
See previous posts.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Is the legitimacy of a universally and peacefully accepted pope a matter of faith? John of St Thomas
+Sanborn on Cum Ex Apostolatus:
"Cum ex apostolatus is an apostolic constitution, a law, made by Pope Paul IV, which says that if a pope should be a heretic, his elevation to this dignity would be null. It was made in order to ensure that no Protestant could ever become the Pope.
It does not apply to the present case for two reasons. The first is that it is no longer the law. It was derogated (made …More
+Sanborn on Cum Ex Apostolatus:
"Cum ex apostolatus is an apostolic constitution, a law, made by Pope Paul IV, which says that if a pope should be a heretic, his elevation to this dignity would be null. It was made in order to ensure that no Protestant could ever become the Pope.
It does not apply to the present case for two reasons. The first is that it is no longer the law. It was derogated (made obsolete) by the 1917 Code of Canon Law. The second reason, and the more important, is that even if it should for some cause still have force, it could only apply to Ratzinger if he were legally recognized as a public heretic. But, as we have seen, there is no legal condemnation of Ratzinger. Before the law of the Church he does not have the status of heretic because (1) he himself does not hold himself guilty of heresy, and (2) no legitimate superior holds him guilty of heresy.
Cum ex apostolatus certainly expresses the mind of the Church with regard to heretics holding office. It makes an excellent theological argument, but it does not make a legal argument. It argues very strongly that in the order of fact Ratzinger is no pope, but not in the order of legality.
mostholytrinityseminary.org/…tent/uploads/2019/01/Explanation-of-the-Thesis.pdf
"Cum ex apostolatus is an apostolic constitution, a law, made by Pope Paul IV, which says that if a pope should be a heretic, his elevation to this dignity would be null. It was made in order to ensure that no Protestant could ever become the Pope.
It does not apply to the present case for two reasons. The first is that it is no longer the law. It was derogated (made obsolete) by the 1917 Code of Canon Law. The second reason, and the more important, is that even if it should for some cause still have force, it could only apply to Ratzinger if he were legally recognized as a public heretic. But, as we have seen, there is no legal condemnation of Ratzinger. Before the law of the Church he does not have the status of heretic because (1) he himself does not hold himself guilty of heresy, and (2) no legitimate superior holds him guilty of heresy.
Cum ex apostolatus certainly expresses the mind of the Church with regard to heretics holding office. It makes an excellent theological argument, but it does not make a legal argument. It argues very strongly that in the order of fact Ratzinger is no pope, but not in the order of legality.
mostholytrinityseminary.org/…tent/uploads/2019/01/Explanation-of-the-Thesis.pdf
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Is the legitimacy of a universally and peacefully accepted pope a matter of faith? John of St Thomas
Cum Ex was abrogated/derogated by the 1917 Code.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Is the legitimacy of a universally and peacefully accepted pope a matter of faith? John of St Thomas
No sede should argue from Cum Ex; it was abrogated/derogated.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Whoever posted this video of Michelle Obama should be ashamed. Nobody thinks this is funny…
Reminds me of:
![](https://seedus3932.gloriatv.net/storage1/cljvb4p18qiit55rxugm8ohxumda1nrfz10fbi7.webp?crop=183.96.0.81&scale=on&secure=3qpxB-ld8faaoNocc6zRpA&expires=1724699646)
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Is the legitimacy of a universally and peacefully accepted pope a matter of faith? John of St Thomas
“We want the truth. We don’t want to use bad arguments, or to dismiss good ones. We don’t want to present things as more certain than they are.”
Comment:
This is precisely what makes the WM Review worth reading, and amidst the polemics between the various SSPX, Resistance, and sedevacantist positions, practically everything unique today:
They strive for truth rather than victory, and so long as …More
“We want the truth. We don’t want to use bad arguments, or to dismiss good ones. We don’t want to present things as more certain than they are.”
Comment:
This is precisely what makes the WM Review worth reading, and amidst the polemics between the various SSPX, Resistance, and sedevacantist positions, practically everything unique today:
They strive for truth rather than victory, and so long as they’re able to maintain that objective as their priority, they’ll continue to be the premier publisher of articles on the subject of the pope.
Comment:
This is precisely what makes the WM Review worth reading, and amidst the polemics between the various SSPX, Resistance, and sedevacantist positions, practically everything unique today:
They strive for truth rather than victory, and so long as they’re able to maintain that objective as their priority, they’ll continue to be the premier publisher of articles on the subject of the pope.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
WHY ARE THEY HERE? what you need to know!
Demons, not aliens.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Interview by Franca Giansoldati
Vigano said:
“On the domestic front, however, Bergoglio abuses the authority of the Papacy (which he usurps) in order to remove from the Church those Catholics who have remained faithful, so that he can eliminate any internal opposition to his subversive plan.”
Comment:
+Fellay did precisely the same thing in expelling dozens of faithful priests to eliminate internal opposition to his reorientation …More
Vigano said:
“On the domestic front, however, Bergoglio abuses the authority of the Papacy (which he usurps) in order to remove from the Church those Catholics who have remained faithful, so that he can eliminate any internal opposition to his subversive plan.”
Comment:
+Fellay did precisely the same thing in expelling dozens of faithful priests to eliminate internal opposition to his reorientation of the SSPX, in pursuit of a practical accord with modernist Rome.
“On the domestic front, however, Bergoglio abuses the authority of the Papacy (which he usurps) in order to remove from the Church those Catholics who have remained faithful, so that he can eliminate any internal opposition to his subversive plan.”
Comment:
+Fellay did precisely the same thing in expelling dozens of faithful priests to eliminate internal opposition to his reorientation of the SSPX, in pursuit of a practical accord with modernist Rome.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò – Interview by Franca Giansoldati
Vigano said:
“On the domestic front, however, Bergoglio abuses the authority of the Papacy (which he usurps) in order to remove from the Church those Catholics who have remained faithful, so that he can eliminate any internal opposition to his subversive plan.”
Comment:
+Fellay did precisely the same thing in expelling dozens of faithful priests to eliminate internal opposition to his reorientation …More
Vigano said:
“On the domestic front, however, Bergoglio abuses the authority of the Papacy (which he usurps) in order to remove from the Church those Catholics who have remained faithful, so that he can eliminate any internal opposition to his subversive plan.”
Comment:
+Fellay did precisely the same thing in expelling dozens of faithful priests to eliminate internal opposition to his reorientation of the SSPX, in pursuit of a practical accord with modernist Rome.
“On the domestic front, however, Bergoglio abuses the authority of the Papacy (which he usurps) in order to remove from the Church those Catholics who have remained faithful, so that he can eliminate any internal opposition to his subversive plan.”
Comment:
+Fellay did precisely the same thing in expelling dozens of faithful priests to eliminate internal opposition to his reorientation of the SSPX, in pursuit of a practical accord with modernist Rome.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Burke on Gender Ideology: Attack on Reason and Nature
Answer: Because his role as good cop is to keep would-be trads mired in conciliar modernism by presenting himself as a (superficial) “approved” trad alternative.
The conciliar hierarchy understands the importance of authority and legality to these types (hence, even Francis wears his cassock), and use it to reeducate the dupes via the hermeneutic of continuity to accept the revolution (ie., to …More
Answer: Because his role as good cop is to keep would-be trads mired in conciliar modernism by presenting himself as a (superficial) “approved” trad alternative.
The conciliar hierarchy understands the importance of authority and legality to these types (hence, even Francis wears his cassock), and use it to reeducate the dupes via the hermeneutic of continuity to accept the revolution (ie., to convince themselves there was no revolution).
Just look how well it has worked against the SSPX.
The conciliar hierarchy understands the importance of authority and legality to these types (hence, even Francis wears his cassock), and use it to reeducate the dupes via the hermeneutic of continuity to accept the revolution (ie., to convince themselves there was no revolution).
Just look how well it has worked against the SSPX.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Gigantic 90ft monkey statue unveiled in Houston, Texas. The Hanuman statue, officially named ‘Statue …
Yes, the evil angels consider us talking monkeys, and that is why they rebelled in heaven when they discovered that the Word would be made flesh, considering it too much a condescension for a spiritual creature to worship one who took flesh. So they mock us through this false religion.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Burke on Gender Ideology: Attack on Reason and Nature
Also, regarding his statement that “the Church must continue to teach the doctrines of faith in all their clarity:” Would it not be “clearer” to say either that the Church should “resume teaching the faith obscured by Vatican II, or, acknowledge that the conciliar church (of which he is a member) does not teach Catholic doctrine?
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Burke on Gender Ideology: Attack on Reason and Nature
I cannot reconcile this statement with his own acceptance of a transsexual man into a nun’s convent/religious order. Anyone?
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Gigantic 90ft monkey statue unveiled in Houston, Texas. The Hanuman statue, officially named ‘Statue …
A religion of demons.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Vatican Monsignor Praises Roman Rite Pilgrimage
He should be prohibited from saying the real Mass until he expresses a desire to leave the conciliar church for the Catholic Church.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Is Francis a Pope or a Pretender? - Fides et Ratio
It ought not be considered slander to proclaim the obvious: A man who publicly holds hands with a notorious sodomite is to bring suspicion of the same proclivity upon himself (and all the more so when the most notable aspect of his putative papacy -other than worshipping demons at the Vatican- is his relentless drive to normalize sodomy in the Church and society).