en.cartoon
131.6K
Saint Paul Teaches That Homosexuality Is Grave Sin Deserving the Wrath of God. Picture: © gloria.tv, CC BY-ND, #newsPpqqryzwhiMore
Saint Paul Teaches That Homosexuality Is Grave Sin Deserving the Wrath of God.

Picture: © gloria.tv, CC BY-ND, #newsPpqqryzwhi
vandlent shares this
16
FRANCIS, #NOTmyPOPE.
🤮More
FRANCIS, #NOTmyPOPE.

🤮
CarolineA03
There are many texts Old Testament and New, calling it a grave sin - one such place is in Romans 1
[21] Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened. [22] For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. [23] And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness …More
There are many texts Old Testament and New, calling it a grave sin - one such place is in Romans 1

[21] Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened. [22] For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. [23] And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of a corruptible man, and of birds, and of fourfooted beasts, and of creeping things. [24]Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonour their own bodies among themselves. [25] Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

[26] For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. [27] And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. [28] And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; [29] Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, [30] Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,


[26] "God delivered them up": Not by being author of their sins, but by withdrawing his grace, and so permitting them, in punishment of their pride, to fall into those shameful sins.

[31] Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. [32] Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

www.drbo.org/drl/chapter/52001.htm
San Atanasio ora pro nobis
Esta carta abierta de la Dra Randy Engel, entre otras cosas, apunta a los siguientes temas:
– Nombramiento por Francisco del sodomita ” Mons.” Battista Ricca
– Cómo el lenguaje gay ha neutralizado efectivamente la oposición a la pervertida agenda-homo.
– Por qué no existe algo así como un persona homosexual.
– Conexión intrínseca entre la homosexualidad, la pornografía, las drogas y el …More
Esta carta abierta de la Dra Randy Engel, entre otras cosas, apunta a los siguientes temas:
– Nombramiento por Francisco del sodomita ” Mons.” Battista Ricca
– Cómo el lenguaje gay ha neutralizado efectivamente la oposición a la pervertida agenda-homo.
– Por qué no existe algo así como un persona homosexual.
– Conexión intrínseca entre la homosexualidad, la pornografía, las drogas y el crimen.
– Conexión intrínseca entre la homosexualidad y la pederastia.
– Diferencias entre la pederastia y la pedofilia
– Existencia intolerable de “parroquias gay” y “ministerios gays” en la nueva iglesia de Francisco.
– Demagogia del Lobby Gay con su “Carta abierta al Papa Francisco “.
El lenguaje gayspeak
Cuando leí por primera vez su respuesta a Scamparini, debo confesar que mi atención no se fijó enseguida en el escándalo Ricca, sino más bien en el hecho de que se utilizó el término “gay” o “personas gay” no menos de cinco veces.
El 6 de junio de 2013, día en que supuestamente hizo un comentario privado a los miembros de la Confederación Latinoamericana de Religiosos y Religiosas afirmó la existencia de un “lobby gay” en el Vaticano, pero el término más tarde se informó con citas. [2] Tal no era el caso en esta ocasión. Debo asumir que su decisión desafortunada de usar el lenguaje políticamente correcto de gayspeak fue deliberado. En tiempos normales, esta acción podría haber sido pasada por alto como un guiño y un asentimiento, pero en tiempos de guerra huele a traición y a corrupción.

radiocristiandad.wordpress.com/…/carta-abierta-a…
Prayhard
Francis considers the Ten Commandments 'rigid' so the plain words of Paul (removed from the Bugnini lectionary) won't mean anything to him. His latest exhortation smells of sulphur.