Cardinal Burke at Tradfest, Croatia. Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke gave a lecture at the TradFast 2016 named: On the Gospel of life and the new evangelization, on the occasion of the launching of his book …More
Cardinal Burke at Tradfest, Croatia.
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke gave a lecture at the TradFast 2016 named: On the Gospel of life and the new evangelization, on the occasion of the launching of his book: Divine Love Made Flesh: The Holy Eucharist as the Sacrament of Charity, in the Croatian language.
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke gave a lecture at the TradFast 2016 named: On the Gospel of life and the new evangelization, on the occasion of the launching of his book: Divine Love Made Flesh: The Holy Eucharist as the Sacrament of Charity, in the Croatian language.
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
OCTOBER 28, 2016
If they would believe Cardinal Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes : Cardinal Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider
It depends upon how Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneidert interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949,since this will determine how they interpret Vatican Council II.If they would believe that …More
OCTOBER 28, 2016
If they would believe Cardinal Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes : Cardinal Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider
It depends upon how Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneidert interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949,since this will determine how they interpret Vatican Council II.If they would believe that Cardinal Richard Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy in 1949 then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes.
If Cardinal Cushing was wrong to assume there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus then Vatican Council II is traditional and has the old ecclesiology.Since there would no be exceptons mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
Presently they both reject Feeneyism which says, according to me, that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS.For them there are exceptions!
For the two of them the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known people saved without the baptism of water.So LG 16 etc become objective and known exceptions to the dogma EENS, even though there are no such cases on earth.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that imaginary cases of the baptism of desire etc were not imaginary. This same error in reasoning is made by Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athansius Schneider.
They would also be saying that all Muslims and Jews, besides other non Catholics, are on the way to Hell since they are not incorporated as members into the Church. It would mean that all Protestants and Orthodox Christians need to formally enter the Church to avoid the fires of Hell.(Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441)
-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 27, 2016
Until Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider affirm Feeneyism as a salvation theology they will not be able to interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity.Vatican Council II will continue to be a rupture with Tradition.
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/until-cardinal-…
If they would believe Cardinal Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes : Cardinal Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider
It depends upon how Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneidert interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949,since this will determine how they interpret Vatican Council II.If they would believe that Cardinal Richard Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy in 1949 then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes.
If Cardinal Cushing was wrong to assume there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus then Vatican Council II is traditional and has the old ecclesiology.Since there would no be exceptons mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
Presently they both reject Feeneyism which says, according to me, that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS.For them there are exceptions!
For the two of them the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known people saved without the baptism of water.So LG 16 etc become objective and known exceptions to the dogma EENS, even though there are no such cases on earth.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that imaginary cases of the baptism of desire etc were not imaginary. This same error in reasoning is made by Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athansius Schneider.
They would also be saying that all Muslims and Jews, besides other non Catholics, are on the way to Hell since they are not incorporated as members into the Church. It would mean that all Protestants and Orthodox Christians need to formally enter the Church to avoid the fires of Hell.(Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441)
-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 27, 2016
Until Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider affirm Feeneyism as a salvation theology they will not be able to interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity.Vatican Council II will continue to be a rupture with Tradition.
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/until-cardinal-…
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Why does Cardinal Burke refer to 'our Christian faith' and not the Catholic faith.
Then he refers to the zeal of the Apostles.
So much of confusion...
The Protestant Christians approve contraception.So why should Catholics also not approve of it since Protestants are going to Heaven according to Cardinal Burke, inspite of supporting contraception and divorce?
For Cardinal Burke there is known …More
Why does Cardinal Burke refer to 'our Christian faith' and not the Catholic faith.
Then he refers to the zeal of the Apostles.
So much of confusion...
The Protestant Christians approve contraception.So why should Catholics also not approve of it since Protestants are going to Heaven according to Cardinal Burke, inspite of supporting contraception and divorce?
For Cardinal Burke there is known salvation outside the Church, there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and so in public he does not affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.
So this is a rupture with the magisterium before the Council of Trent. Popes and Church Councils have affirmed EENS without considering the baptism of desire etc as being an exception.
So if Cardinal Burke can accept the innovation and reject the past magisterium and support the present magisterium, Catholics could then ask why cannot they also abort, since one does not have to follow the moral teachings of only the Catholic Church to go to Heaven? Cardinal Burke rejects traditional salvation theology according to the 16th century missionaries as did Pope Benedict recently, in public.What they can do others can also do.
So if the dogma EENS is not affirmed by Cardinal Burke as the the Early Church and the Apostles, then why follow the moral or other teachings of the Catholic faith which is different from the Christian faith of the other denominations and churches.
I follow the moral teachings of the Catholic Church since I know that this is the Church which is the only path to salvation and that all need to be formal members of the Catholic Church with no exception and it has the fullness of truth.
Then he refers to the zeal of the Apostles.
So much of confusion...
The Protestant Christians approve contraception.So why should Catholics also not approve of it since Protestants are going to Heaven according to Cardinal Burke, inspite of supporting contraception and divorce?
For Cardinal Burke there is known salvation outside the Church, there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and so in public he does not affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.
So this is a rupture with the magisterium before the Council of Trent. Popes and Church Councils have affirmed EENS without considering the baptism of desire etc as being an exception.
So if Cardinal Burke can accept the innovation and reject the past magisterium and support the present magisterium, Catholics could then ask why cannot they also abort, since one does not have to follow the moral teachings of only the Catholic Church to go to Heaven? Cardinal Burke rejects traditional salvation theology according to the 16th century missionaries as did Pope Benedict recently, in public.What they can do others can also do.
So if the dogma EENS is not affirmed by Cardinal Burke as the the Early Church and the Apostles, then why follow the moral or other teachings of the Catholic faith which is different from the Christian faith of the other denominations and churches.
I follow the moral teachings of the Catholic Church since I know that this is the Church which is the only path to salvation and that all need to be formal members of the Catholic Church with no exception and it has the fullness of truth.