A COFFEE WITH GALAT- BENEDICT XVI IS THE TRUE POPE. .More
A COFFEE WITH GALAT- BENEDICT XVI IS THE TRUE POPE.
.
.
@tbswv
You just made the case that Benedict is still the Pope!
He made no mention of your accusations, therefore he was compelled or even blackmailed into resigning. That would make his resignation invalid.
But, you're just calumniating him; Benedict knows exactly what he did.
Bergoglio is the "Bishop in white" shown Sister Lucia by our Lady of Fatima.
You just made the case that Benedict is still the Pope!
He made no mention of your accusations, therefore he was compelled or even blackmailed into resigning. That would make his resignation invalid.
But, you're just calumniating him; Benedict knows exactly what he did.
Bergoglio is the "Bishop in white" shown Sister Lucia by our Lady of Fatima.
adeste fideles
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
S.S. Benedictus XVI Pontifex Maximus , Amén
adeste fideles
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
It was Pope John Paul II who once said: "There cannot be two popes"
No, Benedict is not the true pope. He stepped down in disgrace for his mishandling of the clergy-abuse scandal and the chenanigans at the Vatican Bank exposed by his butler. Like it or not Francis is the pope. Putting together a panel of academics does not add any credibility to your argument. Ridiculous!
Católicos Apostólicos
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Then there was no apostolic succession also because Bergoglio was already a formal heretic in Argentina. 
enraizadosencristo.wordpress.com/…/el-magisterio-d…
“He left the Papal Throne and yet, with the step he took on 11 February 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, something "quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.“
He added that …More
Then there was no apostolic succession also because Bergoglio was already a formal heretic in Argentina.
enraizadosencristo.wordpress.com/…/el-magisterio-d…
“He left the Papal Throne and yet, with the step he took on 11 February 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, something "quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.“
He added that this is why Benedict XVI “has not given up his name”, unlike Pope Celestine V who reverted to his name Pietro da Marrone, “nor the white cassock.”
enraizadosencristo.wordpress.com/…/el-magisterio-d…
“He left the Papal Throne and yet, with the step he took on 11 February 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, something "quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.“
He added that this is why Benedict XVI “has not given up his name”, unlike Pope Celestine V who reverted to his name Pietro da Marrone, “nor the white cassock.”
Católicos Apostólicos
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
rorate-caeli.blogspot.ro/…/two-popes-has-p… : “That is to say, we discover, that Benedict XVI did not intend to renounce the munus petrinus, nor the office, or the duties, i.e. which Christ Himself attributed to the Head of the Apostles and which has been passed on to his successors. The Pope intended to renounce only the ministerium, which is the exercise and concrete administration of that …More
rorate-caeli.blogspot.ro/…/two-popes-has-p… : “That is to say, we discover, that Benedict XVI did not intend to renounce the munus petrinus, nor the office, or the duties, i.e. which Christ Himself attributed to the Head of the Apostles and which has been passed on to his successors. The Pope intended to renounce only the ministerium, which is the exercise and concrete administration of that office.
mccallansteve
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Actually, Pope Benedict abandoned his office which lead to the disaster of a pope we now have.
Católicos Apostólicos
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
