Formal correction of Cardinal Raymond Burke is needed since intimidated by the two popes and the political Left he allowed the 1983 Code of Canon Law to enforce a lie
SEPTEMBER 7, 2017
Formal correction of Cardinal Raymond Burke is needed since intimidated by the two popes and the political Left he allowed the 1983 Code of Canon Law to enforce a lie
A formal correction of Cardinal Raymond Burke(whom I admire otherwise) is needed since intimidated by the two popes and the political Left he allowed the 1983 Code of Canon Law to enforce a lie, which he supported knowingly or unknowingly.1With invisible for him baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) there is alleged known salvation outside the Church, for him.So the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney is rejected.The dogma has developed for him, as it has for Pope Benedict (Avvenire March 2016).So for him there is salvation for Protestants and Orthodox Christians and for non Christians, Jews etc.He approved all this at Marriage Tribunals and as the Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura.2 He does not affirm Feeneyite EENS and neither does he want to affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS.This is politically correct.3 It is the same with John Henry Weston Editor of LifeSites News who interviews him often.He never answers the question and neither does he ask Cardinal Burke, 'How can invisible for us BOD,BOB and I.I be visible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS? Yet this was his reasoning when interpreting Canon Law. How can the 1983 Code of Canon Law support this irrationality and deception? John Henry Weston does not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS for finanical reasons.Like the cardinal he does not want to displease the Jewish Left. For the USCCB bishops the Catholic faith is believing unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are personally known in 2017.So the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS is not proclaimed. How can Cardinal Burke be the Patron of the Knights of Malta or be given another office ? He infers that unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known and objective people in the present times and this is a lie.How can he infer that there is known salvation outside the Church when we do not know of any such person? How could Cardinal Burke create new doctrines on salvation with a new theology based on visible for us BOD, BOB and I.I? Then he enforces this deception with Canon Law.Can a Canon Lawyer question his right to hold a juridical office of the Church?-Lionel Andrades 1.
Fr.Gaudron, like Cardinal Burke and Joseph Shaw does not see how judgement of hypothetical cases result in a non traditional conclusion in Vatican Council II eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/father-matthias…
Cushingism is not part of the whole Tradition of the Church. Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Cushingism: Amoris Laetitia is based on the new moral theology, the heretical theology.
This is all accepted by Fr.John Zuhlsdorf, Cardinal Raymond Burke and Joseph Shaw. They offer/ attend the Traditional Latin Mass with this official heresy eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/this-is-all-acc…
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Prof. Joseph Shaw assume hypothetical factors or theories are explicit exceptions to the traditional de fide teaching on faith and moralseucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/cardinal-raymon…
Cardinal Burke accepts the 'contemporary official magisterium' and does not consider Amoris Laetita heretical, since he uses the same heretical magisterial new moral theologyeucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/cardinal-burke-…
So when Cardinal Burke and Fr. Z say there is no doctrinal change in Vatican Council II ( interpreted with exceptions) or in AL ( with known exceptions) are they really protecting themself ?
What if Cardinal Burke and Fr. Zuhlsdorf said that there are no known exceptions to Catholic moral and salvation theology ?.Would they lose their religious faculties in Rome? eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/what-if-cardina…
Cardinal Burke accepts the liberal moral and faith teachings which have been changed with exceptions, so called known exceptions in the present times
Cushingism is not part of the whole Tradition of the Church. Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Cushingism: Amoris Laetitia is based on the new moral theology, the heretical theology eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/cushingism-is-n…
Cardinal Raymond Burke accepts the liberal moral theology, which affirms known exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.So he will not have noticed this error in Amoris Laetitia eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/cardinal-raymon…
SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 Formal correction of cardinals needed : understanding of salvation at Novus Ordo Mass same as St.Paul's Greek Mass
The Catechumen you refer to is a hypothetical case for you and me. So it is not an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Fr.John Hardon too did not notice this. eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/the-catechuman-… For Cardinal Raymond Burke these hypothetical cases are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla saluseucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/for-cardinal-ra… __________________________________________________
