Innocent Catholics in the Neo Catechumenal Way like those among traditionalists need to be helped out

October 14, 2017

Innocent Catholics in the Neo Catechumenal Way like those among traditionalists need to be helped out

Pope Francis talks with Kiko Argüello, founder of the Neocatechumenal Way, in Rome on March 6.
Pope Francis talks with Kiko Arguello, founder of the Neocatechumenal Way, in Rome on March 6.
The two popes are supporting a false catechesis by catechists of the New Cathechumenal Way of Kiko Arguello.During their catechesis they say every one does not need to enter the Church.I was present at a catechesis when the lay catechist, from the 'first community', drew the figure of a ship on the blackboard.He said that in the past it was thought that every one needed to enter the boat for salvation.But not any more.
This is still approved by the magisterium of the Church.
I was also present at an Ecclesiology class conducted by an American Dominican at the Angelicum, University of St.Thomas Aquinas, Rome . He said that everyone does not need any more to enter the Church for salvation. He cited the cases of Fr. Leonard Feeney, like the good liberal and heretic that he was.

Even until today this error is being taught at the Angelicum by Fr. Francesco Giordano, the Director of the Human Life International Office in Rome. He seems to be doing this to protect his career.The truth is not a priority.
These priests-professors were supported by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine. The German cardinal and future pope was not going to say in public that invisible for us baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, were not visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.He was not going to say that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office in 1949 was in heresy with their new found irrationality i.e invisible people are visible exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church.
But when Cardinal Ratzinger kept quiet and allowed this error to be taught, since he did not want to be a martyr like Pope Calistus, whose feast we celebrate today, where were the apologists John Hardon, the bishops Lefebvre,Fellay and Williamson ? Why was there no one to correct him? Why does not Cardinal Burke and the other traditionalists today like the catechists of the Neo Catechecumal Way, state every one does not need to enter the Church since there are no exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I known in the present times?
Five months back Archbishop Guido Pozzo and the two popes wanted the SSPX to accept a magisterium which teaches irrationality and there have been no public objections from any one in the SSPX,on this point.
Now the catechists of Kiko Arguello's community and the traditionalists like the SSPX, need to be explained that invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I never ever were exceptions to the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So Vatican Council II (LG 16, UR 3 etc) is not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.

But when are the Focolares, Charismatic Renewal and the traditionalists going to announce the obvious i.e we cannot meet or see any one in 2017 saved with the baptism of deire etc?
Before religious communities ask for canonical status they should also ask the Vatican to affirm the Catholic faith in public for them. Ask them to interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as being invisible in 2017. So there are no explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries of the 16th century. If they are not willing to do so why would you want them to grant you canonical status ?
Why ask for recognition from popes and bishops who will not affirm a de fide teaching of the Church, which Pope Pius XII called 'infallible'. Let your religious community remain as a society.Stay in the lay state.But don't ask for canonical status from the popes and bishops who are denying the faith on the exclusivist ecclesiology- issue.As them first to convert then seek canonical status.
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are the popes.I accept this. But I affirm the dogma EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II is a not a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century for me. It is not so for them. I affirm the Nicene Creed but without the irrational premise. So I am not affirming the Nicene Creed like the two popes. Similarly I accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church. But unlike the two popes and most bishops and priests I do not interpret the Catechism (1994) with an irrational premise.
The interpretation of magisterial documents with an irrational premise is the work of Satan and so ecclesiastical Masonry is obliged to follow.I as a Catholic am not obliged to do so.
The innocent people in the Neo Catechumenal Way and the traditionalists who follow religious leaders who use the false premise, need to be helped out.Someone needs to show them where they are wrong and how they must resist the two popes who are in schism with the magisterium of the past and are teaching error on the issue of salvation.They need to help the two popes to come back to the Catholic Faith.-Lionel Andrades