St. Maximillian Kolbe, sorry to say, took "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" at face value which was a serious mistake since it was a hoax. Five years before Kolbe's cited 1926 article, Irish writer Philip Graves published an expose' series in The Times Of London exposing numerous instances where the "secret Jewish document" had, in fact, clearly plagiarized a French political satire written in …More
St. Maximillian Kolbe, sorry to say, took "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" at face value which was a serious mistake since it was a hoax.
Five years before Kolbe's cited 1926 article, Irish writer Philip Graves published an expose' series in The Times Of London exposing numerous instances where the "secret Jewish document" had, in fact, clearly plagiarized a French political satire written in 1864 by Maurice Joly. Subsequent scholarship has since exposed extensive plagiarism from another rabidly anti-Semitic writer, Hermann Goedsche.
Kolbe didn't do his homework and (we can hope) repeated other people's lies simply out of ignorance.
"Tradition In Action" is exploiting a saint's lousy scholarship to legitimize their own bigotry. "The Protocols" were a lie, Kolbe unwittingly repeated those lies as untruth and now they're using the saint to prove their lies are sound Catholic teaching.
henrymakow.com Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote that the book exhibits "the mind of a genius." Pretty good for a hoax, wouldn't you say? Solzhenitsyn said it exhibits "great strength of thought and insight... Its design... (increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm)...is well above the abilities of an ordinary mind... It is more complicated than a …More
henrymakow.com Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote that the book exhibits "the mind of a genius." Pretty good for a hoax, wouldn't you say?
Solzhenitsyn said it exhibits "great strength of thought and insight... Its design... (increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm)...is well above the abilities of an ordinary mind... It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb."
I believe the Protocols are genuine. They are lectures addressed to Jewish Freemasons (probably at the Mizraim Lodge in Paris) detailing an incredible plan to overthrow Western Civilization, subjugate mankind, and concentrate "all the wealth of the world... in our hands." They were given as a regular series of workshops to these Masons in Paris. The author describes them as an "exposition of our programme" and often begins by saying, "Today we will discuss..."
Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was published by Sergyei Nilus in Russia in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone …More
Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was published by Sergyei Nilus in Russia in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and
under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Soviet land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner's of being shot on sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied
them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes. Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus: "The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are
sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT
"Sorry, the Protocols are NOT a hoax..."@Sir Percy Technically, they're a literary forgery. The orginal source material has been uncovered and the plagiarism extensively documented. wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion "Pretty good for a hoax, wouldn't you say?" ...hence its enduring popularity among the gullible. "I believe the Protocols are genuine." You're certainly welcome …More
"Sorry, the Protocols are NOT a hoax..."@Sir Percy Technically, they're a literary forgery. The orginal source material has been uncovered and the plagiarism extensively documented.
...hence its enduring popularity among the gullible.
"I believe the Protocols are genuine."
You're certainly welcome to your own beliefs. ;-) Unfortunately, in this case, those beliefs are readily contradicted by factual evidence to the contrary.
No, both you gents have, on multple points. Your kind rarely know your history. "The Protocols" were originally debunked in The Times Of London whose editor at that time, Wickham Steed, was an outspoken anti-Semite. So,"Commie, Jew-controlled Wikipedia" is only repeating info originally published by a Jew-hating news editor who actually cared about the truth. Surprise! :D In short, pic related …More
No, both you gents have, on multple points. Your kind rarely know your history. "The Protocols" were originally debunked in The Times Of London whose editor at that time, Wickham Steed, was an outspoken anti-Semite. So,"Commie, Jew-controlled Wikipedia" is only repeating info originally published by a Jew-hating news editor who actually cared about the truth. Surprise! :D In short, pic related for the both of you.
Since you asked, because the source of the expose isn't being used to support the accuracy of the evidence presented. Rather, it's being used to disprove the fallacious argument you and Sir Percy raised. In short, I used factual information to disprove Sir Percy's claim about "The Protocols". His response (and yours) was a Genetic Fallacy. I then used factual information to disprove your Genetic …More
Since you asked, because the source of the expose isn't being used to support the accuracy of the evidence presented. Rather, it's being used to disprove the fallacious argument you and Sir Percy raised.
In short, I used factual information to disprove Sir Percy's claim about "The Protocols". His response (and yours) was a Genetic Fallacy. I then used factual information to disprove your Genetic Fallacy, as well.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. You fail at logic, Steve. It isn't just that your thinking is wrong, you don't know how to think. This is just another example. ;-)
Someday you'll realize condescension works only when your wit isn't on par with your reasoning. And I don't feel sorry for you in the slightest, You don't get an "A" for effort, Steve. In your case, well... only a "D".. ;-)
UV, Maurice Joly Plagiarized "Protocols of Zion" (not vice-versa) August 3, 2018 (image: Maurice Joly 1821-1879, was a Jew named Joseph Levy with a history of plagiarism.) The assumption is that since Protocols appeared some 40 years after Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work. But the Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-…More
UV, Maurice Joly Plagiarized "Protocols of Zion" (not vice-versa) August 3, 2018 (image: Maurice Joly 1821-1879, was a Jew named Joseph Levy with a history of plagiarism.)
The assumption is that since Protocols appeared some 40 years after Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work. But the Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-Semitic ruse, the "Protocols of Zion" are authentic. henrymakow.com
But, thank you UV, for allowing me to continue to post the mountains of evidence, direct and circumstantial, that prove the Protocols to be real, and on track up to this day...as Henry says: "In different ways, both Zionists and Nazis have made it synonymous with virulent anti Semitism and genocide. But surely Jews should not be blamed for the machinations of a tiny secret society. The vast majority …More
But, thank you UV, for allowing me to continue to post the mountains of evidence, direct and circumstantial, that prove the Protocols to be real, and on track up to this day...as Henry says: "In different ways, both Zionists and Nazis have made it synonymous with virulent anti Semitism and genocide. But surely Jews should not be blamed for the machinations of a tiny secret society. The vast majority of Jews would disavow this master plan if they believed it existed. Surely one can condemn all racism and genocide in the strongest possible terms and still believe the Protocols are authentic. In my opinion, the equation with anti Semitism is really a ploy to divert attention away from this master plan. The plagiarism claim is part of a propaganda campaign waged by conscious and unconscious collaborators in academia and the media."
@Sir Percy Maurice "Textual evidence shows that it could not have been produced prior to 1901". Joly was already dead for decades.So was the other plagiarized source, Hermann Goedsche. You're linking the author's main site, not the relevant article. "But, thank you UV, for allowing me to continue to post the mountains of evidence, direct and circumstantial" No need to thank me. I'm not allowing …More
@Sir Percy Maurice "Textual evidence shows that it could not have been produced prior to 1901". Joly was already dead for decades.So was the other plagiarized source, Hermann Goedsche.
You're linking the author's main site, not the relevant article.
"But, thank you UV, for allowing me to continue to post the mountains of evidence, direct and circumstantial"
No need to thank me. I'm not allowing you to do anything and you haven't poste andy "mountains of evidence".
All you've posted is an unsupported claim and an URL to website currently stating: Israeli Army Draftees are Forcibly Vaccinated :D
One more comment from Sir Percy
