"As a bishop, it is my duty to warn the West! The barbarians are already inside the city." - Cardinal Robert Sarah
13.09.2025
THE BISHOP IN LATINA DOES NOT INTERPRET THE CREEDS ETC IN THE ORIGINAL AT HOLY MASS IN ITALIAN
.
Bishop Mariano Crociata does not affirm the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Nicene Creed in the original. We now know that they are not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. This is a canonical issue. He has no right to offer Holy Mass. The bishop in the diocese of Latina, Italy has suspended a priest of the diocese on vague charges. In the diocese, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms must be interpreted rationally and in the original and not be rejected at Holy Mass in Italian. The bishop and the Curia do not do this. The Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Nicene Creed ( I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins) does not allow for known exceptions, or any exception on earth. The diocese of Latina has not responded to these reports indicating that the whole diocese interprets the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, with alleged known exceptions, confusing what is implicit as explicit, subjective as objective. The bishop had been teaching theology and has been associated with the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI). How can we have a bishop who for political left reasons, like the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and so rejects orthodoxy. Vatican Council II and the Catechism are magisterial documents and have to be interpreted rationally, i.e. on the charts, ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’. The hypothetical passages marked in red do not contradict the orthodox, exclusivist passages in blue. Vatican Council II has acontinuity with Tradition and the Catechism is aligned with the other catechisms. But for the bishop there is the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It is aligned with liberalism and contradicts tradition.Invisible cases of LG 14 and LG 16 are projected as visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times. They are seen as objective exceptions for EENS. The Athanasius Creed is made obsolete. The diocese of Latina is in a break with historical Rome. There is schism.New versions of the Creeds are first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths (Ad Tuendem Fidem, Pope John Paul II) Since there is no denial from the bishop he should resign. He is unable to affirm the Faith in public. The bishop needs to clarify that Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism etc are not paths to salvation (AG 7, CCC 845, 846, and 1257) and their members are oriented to the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (Athanasius Creed, Notification, Fr. J. Dupuis sj, 2001, Pope John Paul II etc ). Where I live at the Missionaries of Charity Contemplative Brothers of Mother Teresa in Prenestina, Rome, the Father General Fr. Ramon Lustiner m.c and the founder Fr. Sebastian Vazhakhala m.c, affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, rationally. The Secretary of the Lay Missionaries of Charity, Rome, Gianna Tommasi, also affirms Vatican Council II ( AG 7) and the Catechism ( 845,846,1257). It is the same for the Parish Priest at Sant Agapito, Fr. Paolo Boumis. Bishop Mariano Crociata, is not magisterial or apostolic on the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms which are interpreted irrationally i.e. the baptism of desire, for example refers to a physically visible case in the present times. - Lionel Andrades
Because the real enemy is from within.