Tesa
91.3K
Marian image at LA’s Cathedral
Ultraviolet
Everything about the LA Cathedral is a modernist disaster. This is no exception.
mccallansteve
Garbage modern art that belongs in the toilet bowl.
Ultraviolet
Technically speaking, it's good sculpture. It just isn't Mary nor does it correspond to any notion of Catholic Marian iconography. Oh. Just in case you want some basis of comparison for bad sculpture, in the sense of (as you correctly described it) garbage modern art, check out Giacometti's "Pointing Man".
news.artnet.com/…/pointing-801x10…
You're looking at the most expensive sculpture ever …More
Technically speaking, it's good sculpture. It just isn't Mary nor does it correspond to any notion of Catholic Marian iconography. Oh. Just in case you want some basis of comparison for bad sculpture, in the sense of (as you correctly described it) garbage modern art, check out Giacometti's "Pointing Man".

news.artnet.com/…/pointing-801x10…

You're looking at the most expensive sculpture ever sold on the open (i.e. legal) market.:
eticacasanova
That thing can't be the mother of God, because that's an "ambiguous" man, and one of those can't be a mother
hitherto
SvataHora
Sick brains... By the way, looks more like a young man in a long skirt. (Angel in the empty grave of Jesus?`)
hitherto
This image is half male, half female. It is a sacrilege and the people should demand it's removal. If it doesn't go then maybe the person who approved it should go. It is a monstrosity of the mother of God.
dpfurey
Mary had a crew cut?
Thors Catholic Hammer
How incredibly dull dreary and drab.
I know Mary once lived in a village called Nazareth and let me tell you she would not be seen dead in such an ugly inhuman and thoroughly alien outfit.