en.news

Leo XIV Disputed the Immutability of Catholic Moral Teaching

José Antonio Ureta, a Rome-based scholar from the TFP group, was “somewhat surprised” that Leo XIV appears to have no plan for addressing the homosexual ideology, despite acknowledging that the hierarchy is “deeply polarised”.

Talking to NcRegister.com on 18 September, Ureta referred to Leo XIV’s CruxNow.com interview.

Ureta explained that, from the outset, the Church's response to such polarisation has been to resolve the matter definitively through dogmatic teaching, rather than postponing or deferring it.

He also expressed his perplexity at Pope Leo XIV’s suggestion that it is highly unlikely the Church’s teaching on sexuality and marriage will change in the near future.

"The point is not whether such a change is likely or unlikely; the Church's teaching in these areas cannot change at all," Ureta explained.

He added that the Pope should affirm this with absolute clarity, leaving no room for doubt or ambiguity.

Philosopher Edward Feser added on X.com: "As in any conflict between heresy and orthodoxy, the only Catholics who are 'polarising' where the Church’s teaching on sexual morality is concerned are those who reject it."

Feser continued: "It is never divisive in itself to uphold the Church’s perennial teaching on a matter; it is always divisive to reject or obscure it."

#newsYdxgxjzxle
91.3K
Ann Smith

A very holy priest who died a hermit in Fatima told me the Vatican is full of Freemasons.

The Masonic plan to destroy the Church required a Masonic pope who would demand changes in the name of obedience. (LIONEL: The Masonic pope too would have to follow Vatican Council II interpreted only rationally and not irrationally today like the TFP, SSPX , FSSP and the liberals. The pope is restricted by Vatican Council II just as the traditionaliss are restricted by Vatican Council II, irrational, whose conclusion is liberal.

The Masonic plan to destroy the Church required a Masonic pope who would demand changes in the name of obedience.
Prevost preaches obedience to himself while simultaneously promoting disobedience to God and the Church.
"In a hundred years time . . .bishops and priests will think they are marching behind the banner of the keys of Peter when in fact they will be following our flag . . . The reforms will have to be brought about in the name of obedience." Alta Vendita\masonic document

Prevost preaches obedience to himself while simultaneously promoting disobedience to God and the Church.
(LIONEL: He follows Vatican Council II irratonal and not rational. The conclusion is liberal.)

One of the sins of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is to refute Revealed Truth.

3 more comments from la verdad prevalece

Leo XIV Disputed the Immutability of Catholic Moral Teaching
By questioning Catholic moral doctrine, Prevost demonstrates himself to be a schismatic, a heretic, and an apostate. This is because the Church has affirmed that Catholic doctrine is a unified whole; if one part is rejected or questioned, the entire doctrine is rejected.
By questioning the immutability of the Church, Prevost is questioning the Church's infallibility, which teaches that the Church cannot err. In doing so, Prevost places himself above God and the Church. Bergoglio did the same when, at the request of the apostate Hans Küng, he stated that he would study the dogma of papal infallibility.

The Scriptures clearly state that polarization and division between good and evil (1 Corinthians 11:19) are necessary to distinguish those who are with God from those who are against Him. And the gay activist Robert Prevost is on the wrong side, serving Bergoglio's satanic and anti-Catholic agenda.

Unfortunately, the fruit of ecumenism is the rotten fruit of Vatican II, which has led to a violation of the First Commandment, since it is clear that its aim is not the conversion of false religions, but rather religious syncretism. Pope Benedict XVI tried in vain to propose a supposed "hermeneutic of continuity," which was the thin line between the Church of the Saints and the novelty of the Novus Ordo, a line that Bergoglio broke, as explained by the former schismatic and apostate priest, Leonardo Boff, who declared that Bergoglio was the pope of rupture and that he had begun by changing the papacy. Boff stated that, in order to create a "universal church," Bergoglio needed to break with the Tradition of the Church to make way for this new church, a concept that Boff himself had already proposed in his apostate document, "Letter to the Earth" (the Church of Pachamama/the apostate anti-church).
Prevost promotes a universal Masonic brotherhood, which includes apostates and those who reject God as their Father and disobey His commandments.
Sinners are ‘children of wrath’ and ‘enemies of God’
All mortal sins, even those of thought, make men children of wrath (Eph 2:3) and enemies of God. (Denzinger-Hünermann 1680, Julius III – Council of Trent, session XIV

The Diabolic Deception of Dignitas Infinita
“By sin, man loses a twofold dignity, one in respect of God, the other in respect of the Church. In respect of God, he again loses a twofold dignity. One is his principal dignity, whereby he was counted among the children of God, and this he recovers by Penance, which is signified (Luke 15) in the prodigal son, for when he repented, his father commanded that the first garment should be restored to him, together with a ring and shoes. The other is his secondary dignity, viz. innocence, of which, as we read in the same chapter, the elder son boasted saying (Luke 15:29): “Behold, for so many years do I serve thee, and I have never transgressed thy commandments”: and this dignity the penitent cannot recover” (Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II, Q.89, A3).

De Profundis shares this

Pope Leo Suggests Church Doctrine On Human Sexuality and Women's Ordination Could Be Changed

100

The TFP and Fraser interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. This causes division. Liberalism is division in the Church. It has no support in Vatican Council II interpreted only rationally and so traditional. This is the only moral option we have.