22.09.2025
SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM PROCESSION IN OCTOBER MAINTAINS RATZINGERS SECRET : POPE LEO HIDES IT FROM THE FSSP AND COETUS INT’L
With LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc invisible in Vatican Council II, the interpretation o Vatican Council II changes for whoever reads it. Vatican Council II supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) while theoretical cases mentioned in Nostra Aetate, Lumen Gentium etc, are not practical exceptions for EENS, AG 7 or CCC 846. They are not exceptions for the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the Latin Mass.
But when Pope Benedict issued Summorum Pontificum, he was still interpreting LG 8, 14, 16 etc as physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and so for him they were practical exceptions for AG 7, CCC 846 etc. He used the False Premise.What is invisible he projected as being visible. So invisible cases of LG 16 would be visible exceptions for AG 7, CCC 846 etc.
With the Rational Premise ( what is invisible is seen as just being visible), LG 16 would be an invisible case and so would not be an exception for AG 7 which is aligned with the dogma EENS. So Vatican Council II would have a continuity with Tradition. Even the participants at the Summorum Pontifical procession and the 11 Pax Liturgical Gathering next month in Rome make the same mistake on Vatican Council II,. It is also extended to the Nicene Creed and all the Catechisms.
Pope Leo used the False Premise of Fr. Claude Barthe, Chaplain of the Coetus Internationalis Summorum Pontifical, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Synods depend upon Vatican Council II being interpreted with the False and not Rational Premise.
After Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez used the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and produce a liberal conclusion, they excommunicated the SSPX bishops and Superior General.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez did the same with Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and others.
They were following Cardinal Ratzinger before the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops. Nothing has changed.
Ratzinger did not tell the SSPX bishops when he issued Summorum Pontificum that if they interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise (LG 16 invisible) then the conclusion would be traditional. It would be the liberals who would be in schism. He kept this a secret until his death. He did not tell Lefebvre that Vatican Council II supported the traditionalists.
When Pope Leo XIV met the Superior General of the FSSP he maintained the secret. The FSSP will maintain ‘the secret’ at their church in Rome, Trinita dei Pelligrini, when the Summorim Pontificum procession and Mass will be held in October 2026.
- Lionel Andrades
Pilgrimage Summorum Pontificum
21.09.2026
REVIEW OF THE VATICAN NOTE ON NOSTRA AETATE BY LIONEL ANDRADES
@Lionel Leslie Andrades
21.09.2026
CARDINAL BURKE AND BISHOP SCHNEIDER INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY TO AVOID THE ‘TERRORIST’ CHARGE.
@Lionel Leslie Andrades
19.09.2006
THE VATICAN NOTE ON NOSTRA AETATE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY AS DO THE SSPX AND SEDEVACANTISTS
@Lionel Leslie Andrades
19.09.2006
THE SSPX AMBIGUITY ON LG 16 RESULTS IN THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF TRADITI0NALISTS
@Lionel Leslie Andrades
The SSPX still needs to issue a clarification on Lumen Gentium 16 - does it refer to an invisible or visible person in 2026 ?.
@Lionel Leslie Andrades