THE LIONEL ANDRADES INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS DOGMATIC, MAGISTERIAL, APOSTOLIC, RATIONAL AND ETHICAL: POPE LEO MUST ADAPT
THE LIONEL ANDRADES INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS DOGMATIC, MAGISTERIAL, APOSTOLIC, RATIONAL AND ETHICAL: POPE LEO MUST ADAPT
The SSPX Profession of Faith can be read with the Lionel Andrades (L.A) interpretation. VC2 is traditional and ecclesiocnetric. The blue orthodox passages dominate. The red ones are not exceptions for the blue passages.
The text of Vatican Council II read rationally supports the traditionalists but when read irrationally supports Pope Leo and the liberals.
High Noon after July 1, 2026. Canon and secular petitions will target irrational and dishonest interpretations of Vatican Council II by cardinals and bishops. Reason and tradition support the conservative Catholics.
When Vatican Council II is traditional and aligned with the conservatives how can the SSPX be excommunicated in the name of the Council?
When Vatican Council II is traditional with ‘the blue passages’ not contradicted by ‘the red passages’ how can Pope Leo remain liberal and ordain schismatic, liberal bishops?
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the EU, George Weigel and the US State Department and Georgia Melloni and Lorenzo Fontana and the Italian Government is dishonest. It is unethical. There is a rational choice.
Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. The Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite. Brother Andre Marie micm is Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Pope Leo is Cushingite. He must affirm Vatican Council II Feeneyite.
Ratzinger did not tell Lefebvre that LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to invisible cases and Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no known exceptions, Feeneyite EENS. LG 16 is not a practical exceptions for EENS or AG 7. Instead they excommunicated him. Pope Leo is ready to do the same. This is religious injustice. Discriminatioin. A violation of a human right. A dishonest coercion today
I affirm the SSPX Profession of Faith and I also affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally. I go for the Novus Ordo Mass. Vatican Council II rational, is apostolic, magisterial and dogmatic for me. It has a continuity with the Council of Florence 1442 on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), an ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Pius XII and an ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass in the Middle Ages.
I am a Roman Catholic who works for the Proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics and the non separation of Church and State, as it was known at the time of the Papal States in Europe and the Austro Hungarian Catholic Empire.
I believe in Heaven there are only Catholics (AG 7, CCC 845,846).
I was baptised as an infant at St. Patrick’s Cathedral, Karachi. My parents and grandparents were Catholic, going back some seven or eight generations as Catholics, in Goa, the former Portuguese colony, where St. Francis Xavier evangelised.
RECONCILIATION
I think we can finally have reconciliation over the issue of Vatican Council II, since we have a doctrinal breaktthrough, a new discovery, which is all there in the text itself of Vatican Council II. The text does not allow you to speculate. Reason restricts you. There is a tilt towards the trads. Support has come from unexpected quarters- the Council itself.
The timing is providential. Just before the axe was about to fall it is discovered that Vatican Council II in its essence, supports the traditionalists and not the liberals.
There is a pattern deep in the text of the Council which was not known. Or perhaps, it was hidden. No one spoke about it.
I simply refer to it as ‘the red is not an exception for the blue ‘.This is a quick, easy, handle with which to discuss a subject made complex un-necessarily.
We see the same pattern in all the catechisms. There are the orthodox passages supporting exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and there are passages which refer to hypothetical cases, people saved outside the Church. The former I refer to as the blue passages and the latter, ‘the red passages ‘
So now those thousands of lay Catholics, who could be excommunicated post-July 1, have good news. The Council supports you and not Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez. ‘The red is not an exception for the blue.’
The red is not an exception for the blue! Since the red passages refer to theoretical cases. They are not practical exceptions in 2026 for the blue orthodox passages aligned with the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and traditional ecclesiocentric mission. There are no known exceptions for the ecclesiology of the Latin and Greek Mass. The lex orandi is still traditional irrespective of the liturgy.
HIGH NOON FOR LIBERALS
Vatican Council II with the blue passages not contradicted by the red, is aligned with Augustine and Aquinas on EENS, with Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and the professors of the St.Benedict Center , expelled by Boston College at the time of Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston. Sister Catherine Clark Goddard, Fr. Francis Malus micm and others are remembered. A Feeneyite Vatican Council II salutes them.
HIDDEN SECRET OF POPE LEO
It is Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church which are affirming traditionalist Feeneyite EENS. This was the hidden secret of Pope Paul VI in 1965 before he lifted the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney, who never recanted. He recited the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.
This was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger’s hidden secret before he excommunicated Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops, two of whom are still alive.
This was Ratzinger’s hidden secret when he did not grant the SSPX canonical recognition, citing doctrinal differences.
This was the secret being hidden by Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez as they prepare to excommunicate the SSPX, who will not accept the conclusion of a Vatican Council II interpreted with the ‘the red being an exception for the blue’, something irrational and dishonest.
With the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II the red is not an exception for the blue. It is Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez who are in schism with the popes of the Middle Ages , the Church Fathers and the Apostles. They also reject a dogmatic and apostolic Vatican Council II.
They can no more interpret the Council by projecting hypothetical cases ( LG 8, 14, 16) as being practical exceptions for Tradition ( AG 7 etc). Amoris Laetitia, Traditionis Custode and Fiducia Supplicans were issued with the Council interpreted irrationally. The liberal reforms of Vatican Council II were based upon this same objective error.
How can the Church be obedient to a schismatic-on-Vatican Council II pope and prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican?
They mainline Church can now only be conservative and orthodox. They are restricted by Vatican Council II.
How can Pope Leo ordain bishops while in schism on Vatican Council II ? Who gives him the right to interpret the Council dishonestly, in a canonical and secular sense?
He has an obligation to proclaim the Catholic Faith, even if it calls for martyrdom and the destruction of the Vatican
Even if the SSPX is excommunicated, canonical and secular petitions will target cardinals and bishops, who continue to interpret Vatican Council II, irrationally and schismatically. - Lionel Andrades
THE ‘BLUE PASSAGES’ DOMINATE IN THE SSPX DECLARATION OF FAITH, THE SAME AS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II WHICH IS NOW ECCLESIOCENTRIC AND TRADITIONAL AND NO MORE LIBERAL
THE ‘BLUE PASSAGES’ DOMINATE IN THE SSPX …
27.06.2026
SSPX ASK THE VATICAN IF THE LIONEL ANDRADES INTERPRETATION OF VC 2 IS ACCEPTABLE. THE FALSE PREMISE IS AVOIDED
SSPX ASK THE VATICAN IF THE LIONEL ANDRADES …
GENERAL CONSENSUS IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH : VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH THE COUNCIL OF FLORENCE 1442 ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
GENERAL CONSENSUS IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH : …
01.02.2026
NO DENIAL FROM THE VATICAN : FOR THEM TOO LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3,M NA 2, GS 22 REFER TO INVISIBLE CASES IN 2026 : NOT A RUPTURE WITH TRADITION
NO DENIAL FROM THE VATICAN : FOR THEM TOO LG 8, …
14.03.2026
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ STILL HIDES THE SECRET: VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS ALIGNED WITH THE TRADITIONALISTS
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ STILL HIDES THE SECRET: …
03.01.2025
Pope FRANCIS, CARD. FERNANDEZ AND MSGR.KENNEDY INTERPRETED VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY DURING THE VIGANO-SCHISM TRIAL: POPE LEO MUST CORRECT THE INJUSTICE
Institutional dishonesty. Injustice against Vigano
POPE FRANCIS, CARD. FERNANDEZ AND MSGR.KENNEDY …
02.11.2025
A. I SEES SCHISM OVER VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL : THE CATHOLIC CHURCH RETURNS TO THE MIDDLE AGES
A. I SEES SCHISM OVER VATICAN COUNCIL II …