The editorial at the beginning of this week’s print edition of the Catholic Herald, the UK’s best Catholic weekly.
When Vatican Council II is in agreement with the philosophy and theology of Feeneyism ( invisible cases are not visible and so they are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) according to the 16th century magisterium ) then Dignitatis Humanae is not a rupture with the dogma EENS. Then no matter how you interpret Dignitatis Humanae, if Vatican Council II affirms outside the Church there is no salvation, then religious liberty is traditional.1Dignitatis Humane does not contradict the Church's traditional doctrine.2
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf ,like the editorial staff at Catholic Herald the U.K bishops and the Vatican Curia interpret Dignitatis Humane (DH)with the theology of Cushingism. The SSPX does the same. So there is the tension for traditionalist and conservative Catholics with reference to DH.
If they simply switched to Feeneyism as a theology( invisible baptism of desire cannot be a visible exception to EENS in 2017, the same with LG 16, LG 8 ,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc)and philosophy( physically invisible cases are not practically visible.Hypothetical cases of someone saved in invincible ignorance is not an objective and verifiable case on earth)then DH is traditional and is not a doctrinal issue.-Lionel Andrades 1 NO MATTER HOW YOU INTERPRET DIGNITATIS HUMANAE IF VATICAN COUNCIL II AFFIRMS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IS TRADITIONAL eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/no-matter-how-y…
NOVEMBER 25, 2014 The Council’s words are strong and forthright here, implicitly asserting the sovereignty of Christ over all nations, but we now seldom hear them quoted eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/the-councils-wo…
MAY 22, 2014 Franciscans of the Immaculate (FFI) interpret all documents of Vatican Council II with the defacto-dejure, objective-subjective, in fact-in theory distinction eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/franciscans-of-…