John Paul II Institute: L’Osservatore Romano Joins the Battle – by Father Reto Nay
![](https://seedus4268.gloriatv.net/storage1/10ybb2y08m3ggs1yi28gsjjtqj0688z7tlvh7e4.webp?scale=on&secure=1bYDIqmRpSMU9LAaWP7SkQ&expires=1723612721)
Chiodi calls its destruction “a renewal” and the heresy introduced into it “tradition re-interpreted.” Francis’ assault on the indissolubility of marriage is for Chiodi only a matter of “style and form.”
Chiodi believes that the Church needs a new apostasy because it cannot “escape from complex relational dynamics.” Does this verbal garbage mean something?
He bad-mouths the truth as “abstract" and as “disembodied from the drama of history [sic].” His alternative is a cheap relativism.
Quoting Amoris Laetitia, he calls John Paul II’s moral theology “cold writing-desk morals.” Cold? Writing-desk? Does Chiodi pen his writings on the floor of a sauna?
This is how Chiodi tries to fool his audience: He presents two opposites – the objective moral theology and relativism – and puts himself in a non-existing middle.
But Chiodi fails to explain what is wrong with the objective moral theology that takes its object seriously. Therefore, his non-existing “middle position” is not different from commonplace relativism.
Picture: Maurizio Chiodi, #newsNatgbhrrwn