Sans doute parce qu'il vient le l'anglicanisme, le P. Hunwicke, qui est un grand admirateur de John Henry Newman, est très sensible au thème du "développement …
A further coincidence, as Our Lord permitted that King Solomon's Kingdom would be split in two as a punishment for his spiritual adultery - so has His Church, His mystical body ALSO been similarly chastised. Like Solomon's Kingdom, the Church leadership (once called a Sacerdotal Monarchy) has been split. One half retained by it's true Vicar, the other half by a usurper who has no right to be there. …Plus
A further coincidence, as Our Lord permitted that King Solomon's Kingdom would be split in two as a punishment for his spiritual adultery - so has His Church, His mystical body ALSO been similarly chastised. Like Solomon's Kingdom, the Church leadership (once called a Sacerdotal Monarchy) has been split. One half retained by it's true Vicar, the other half by a usurper who has no right to be there.
God is punishing us - I remember hearing about the events at JP II's World Youth Day - the tabernacles had been removed in certain private chapels so that the Budhists present could place their Buddha's (false idols) upon the alters without them looking too Christian. . Also, I read, (and it was clear to see in the footage) that Our Lord's Precious Body and Blood was handed out to everyone, including the heathens in plastic cups! It is not surprising that Our Church is being chastised - but it IS surprising that some of the Popes involved in permitting such outrages against Our Lord are being canonised!
Thanks for the list of links! . "Here is wisdom He That hath understanding, let _him_ count the number of the beast For it is the number of a man. And the number of _him_ is six hundred sixty - six ." [ Revelation 13:18 ] So, is that "Man" Solomon? This is interesting ... "And the weight of the gold that was brought to Solomon every year, was six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold:" [3 Kings …Plus
Thanks for the list of links!
. "Here is wisdom He That hath understanding, let _him_ count the number of the beast For it is the number of a man. And the number of _him_ is six hundred sixty - six ." [ Revelation 13:18 ]
So, is that "Man" Solomon? This is interesting ...
"And the weight of the gold that was brought to Solomon every year, was six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold:" [3 Kings (1 Kings) 10:14]
The Sin of Solomon (who wrote the Book of Wisdom) was Spiritual Adultery. He became very rich due to the power that Yahweh had allowed him to achieve. He was paid 666 talents a year, an amount gathered from all the Nations of the world, a charge that apparantly related to the Temple tax.... he apostasized in the most evil way, bringing down the wrath of God on not o his head, but also the heads of those in his Kingdom,
Solomon had been granted the supreme blessing of being permitted by Our Lord, to inherit the Throne of his Father, King David. Yet despite all these blessings he went terribly wrong spiritually, - led astray into idolatry incurring the wrath of the triune God, - and Yahweh permitted his Kingdom to be split in two!
Solomon attended the ritualistic and satanic practices of the heathens in the Hills surrounding Jerusalem, where apparantly Altars existed upon which children were sacrificed to false gods. As well as this he built temples for his Ba'alist wives to worship their demonic false gods in. Since Yahweh is by His own admission "A Jealous God" who will not stand false idols being accomodated in His Nations or worshiped by His people - His judgement of Solomon was pronounced....
"...Des mots célèbres de [la Constitution dogmatique] Pastor aeternus de Vatican I, enseignent admirablement que l'inspiration de l'Esprit n'a pas été promise au Successeur de Saint Pierre pour qu'il puisse enseigner une nouvelle doctrine, mais pour que par Son aide il puisse garder et fidèlement exposer le Dépôt de la Foi transmis par les Apôtres...."
"...Ici, nous n'avons pas une hérésie, mais la superhérésie. Les hérésiarques d'autrefois ont peut-être perverti le sens de l'Écriture et de la Tradition, mais, selon moi, nous n'avons jamais eu auparavant la prétention diabolique qu'un enseignant hérétique majeur est tout simplement libéré de tout contrôle à l'intérieur de la Parole de Dieu, qu'elle soit écrite ou transmise oralement. …Plus
"...Ici, nous n'avons pas une hérésie, mais la superhérésie. Les hérésiarques d'autrefois ont peut-être perverti le sens de l'Écriture et de la Tradition, mais, selon moi, nous n'avons jamais eu auparavant la prétention diabolique qu'un enseignant hérétique majeur est tout simplement libéré de tout contrôle à l'intérieur de la Parole de Dieu, qu'elle soit écrite ou transmise oralement. Quand j'utilise le terme "diabolique", je l'entend au sens le plus large possible. Les empreintes digitales identifiables sur toutes ces affirmations grotesques sont sans ambiguïté...."
