Would Catholic Answers apologists Tim Staples and Jimmy Akin be approved by Bishop Robert H.Brom in the diocese of San Diego if they did not lie ?

Apologists currently working for Catholic Answers include Director of Apologetics Tim Staples; Senior Apologist Jimmy Akin according to Wikipedia. Catholic Answers Live radio host is Patrick Coffin; and staff apologists Michelle Arnold, Jim Blackburn, Matthew Fradd, Peggy Frye, and Fr. Vincent Serpa O.P.
It is listed in the current edition of The Official Catholic Directory, the authoritative listing of U.S. Catholic organizations, priests, and bishops.Catholic Answers operates with the permission of the Diocese of San Diego.
The Most Rev. Robert H. Brom is the bishop of San Diego.
Tim Staples and Jimmy Akin assume there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to Vatican Council II. If they did say that theydid not know any one in 2013-16 who is saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire, would they be approved by Bishop Robert H.Brom ?
Most likely not.

THE LIE
Tim Staples and Jimmy Akin know what I have been saying. So do the bishops in Los Angeles and the rest of California. This include their administration and Curia members. I have reached them over the years with e-mails.
If Tim Staples and Jimmy Akin speak the truth and say that we do not know any exceptions to the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney the bishop could disown them.
Similarly on the issue of morals Jimmy Akins assumes that mortal sin is not mortal sin with just the first of three conditions mentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church - grave matter. He considers the folowing two conditions also important to recognize mortal sin.He knows that the following two conditions are not known to us and are known only to God.He also contradicts Veritatis Splendor.
So he is expected to accept this irrational position on morals (mortal sin) and faith (salvation) to continue to be approved by Bishop Robert Brom and the leftists.
This is politically correct Catholic apologists and is based on an irrationality and a lie.
-Lionel Andrades

Jimmy Akins, Catholic Answers present an irrational version of Catholic salvation

Jimmy Akins on Catholic Answers denies the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. Instead he suggests that those in invincible ignorance are the ordinary means of salvation and that all Jews(3:32) do not need to convert into the Church but only those who know about Jesus and the Church.Otherwise they just have to live good lives and they are saved.

He assumes that those who are saved through no fault of their own are people who are known precisely in the present times and so they are an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All Jews,Muslims and other non Catholics do not have faith and baptism and so they are oriented to Hell according to Ad Gentes 7.
(6:25) 'In terms of the need to be Catholic,' Jimmy Akins says, 'the Catholic Church would say, if you have an awareness, if you have seen enough evidence that the Catholic Church was founded by Christ and that it's his will for you and you need to embrace it and if you consciously say,"Hey I'm not going to even though I know Jesus wants me to" ,that's to turn your back on Jesus and not accept salvation on his terms one can endanger one's salvation in that way'.

Those who know or do not know are known only to God. So why does Jimmy Akins consider this an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There is no such known case in 2014-2016. Is he assuming that these are known cases in the present times and so are physical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus ? Does it mean that LG 16 ( invincible ignorance) contradicts AG 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) for him? Vatican Council II contradicts itself for Catholic Answers? This is irrational.LG 16 is not a known exception to the traditional interpretation on salvation. This is a false inference of Akins.
(7:00) 'The majority of people who are outside the Catholic Church have not seen that evidence presumably ,'continues the Catholic Answers EWTN,National Catholic Register apologist,'so as long as they are working with God and following him the best that they are able then God still works with them and they still can be saved.' This is false. The majority of people are oriented to Hell according to Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7, since they do not have 'faith and baptism'.

He does not even tell the Lutheran who has asked the question, that he is on the way to Hell since he does not have Catholic Faith (AG 7) which includes the Sacraments and the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church.
-Lionel Andrades