Leo XIV Continues Francis’ Tribute to Indifferentism

The Vatican Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue published on Friday a joint statement for the 8th so-called "Buddhist-Christian Colloquium", which concluded in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Around 150 Buddhist and Christian participants from 16 countries attended. Leo XIV’s delegate was Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad, Prefect of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue, who delivered the opening address.

"During these days, we have prayed [to whom?], visited one another’s places of worship, studied and encountered one another in a spirit of mutual respect and friendship," reads the Vatican statement.

In continuity with Francis’ pontificate, the statement is filled with platitudes, at one point equating Christian revelation with pagan sources.

"We, the Buddhist and Christian participants, met in Phnom Penh - a land profoundly shaped by the compassionate witness of His Holiness Maha Ghosananda [pagan monk, +2007] - to reflect on our sacred texts, spiritual teachings, and lived experiences as sources of healing and hope for a world fractured by violence, injustice, and exploitation".

#newsEtlamblmlh

LikeShare5 1.2K

la verdad prevalece links to this postNov 8

allan500Jun 1

Yeah, but indifferentism is better than the Latin mass, right?

K R RossJun 24edited

Truth and falsehood, good and bad are not the same, are not equal.
Ex. TLM = NOM - false statement. The error of Religious Indifferentism would have us believe that the TLM and the NOM are of equal intrinsic worth, and value. They are not.
True religion, true cult, true doctrine, as embodied by the TLM, are, of course, not just better than false religion, false cult, and heresy, as manifested by the NOM, there is no comparison possible between the two.
That which is true and good and that which lacks truth and goodness cannot be compared (ie. being vs. non-being, or lack/privation of being), just as light, and darkness, or the absence of light cannot in truth be compared except by reference only. Without truth, we would not even be able to conceive of falsehood. Without light, we would not be able to conceive of darkness. Ex. Darkness is what happens when you turn off the light, when there is no light. Light is something. Darkness is nothing. How can we speak of equality between them? We cannot.
Religious indifferentism means the believing that there is no such thing as “the True Religion”, and that ‘all religions have the same value, or worth’ (Ex. Catholicism and Satanism).
Religious indifferentism is a false doctrine, and, therefore, heretical. False doctrine cannot be better than the TLM; just as darkness, or the absence of light, cannot be better than light itself. Just common sense.

K R RossMay 31

The worship of tantric demons with demonic possession!

Boanerges BoanergesMay 31

This is not “indifferentism” this is actively building One world religion under the guise of the Antichrist! Disgrace!

tbswvMay 31

Status Quo on full display. Nothing has really changed has it?