Clicks333
Lionel L. Andrades

Fr. Alessandro M.Minutella critical of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) suspended : Fellay condones Cushingism in exchange for status popular Palermo priest lost

Fr. Alessandro M.Minutella critical of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) suspended : Fellay condones Cushingism in exchange for status popular Palermo priest lost

Vatican Official Confirms Agreement with SSPX

Archbishop Pozzo said that, in interpreting the documents of Vatican II, one clear principle would be continuity: that if an understanding of the Council’s message involves a break with the constant teaching of the Church, “this intepretation must be rejected as false or inadequate.”
www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm
eponymousflower.blogspot.it
Don Alessandro M.Minutella has been critical of Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and a false Church within the Catholic Church and the bishop of Palermo, Italy has suspended him from the parish (San Giovanni Bosco).

This is the bishop who rode a cycle within the church as if this is a qualification for being a bishop, approved by the Masons who represent Satan.
Now Bishop Bernard Fellay condones Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism by the present magisterium, in exchange for the canonical status which Don Massimilliano has been temporarily deprived of .
Bishop Fellay does not support Don Alessandro by showing him how Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology.This priest himself mistakenly interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and knows there is something wrong.Like Bishop Fellay and Mons. Pozzo he does not affirm in public a Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) rejected politically by the bishops in Palermo and Sicily.
The SSPX was also silent when the joint Catholic-Jewish Left document was issued in December 2015 changing the Catholic identity.There was not a single SSPX bishop or priest who said that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with Feeneyism and it would not be a rupture with Tradition. They were all afraid of the Jewish Left and wanted their precious canonical status.The priests and bishops did not want to disobey Fellay and issue a statement. Or they too would be suspended like Minutella.
Now in Rome the homilies are boring and politically correct since it is clear that no one wants to be suspended like the priest in Palerno who has been told he has to leave the parish in 15 days for the good of the parishioners.In Rome there are new doctrines in ecumenism which contradict Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). There is a false inter-religious dialogue which also contradicts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
When teachings on faith and doctrine are not lived by affirmation then the teachings on morals too are ignored, this is being observed.
The SSPX and Mons. Guido Pozzo condone Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and do not talk about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).This is a doctrinal white wash and deception.-
Lionel Andrades

Video : Don Alessandro Maria Minutella Omelia 31 marzo 2017
youtu.be/JDnRt3JdisE

TERMS EXPLAINED
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.
Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation..
Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.
Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water. -Lionel Andrades
________________________

March 2, 2017
Who am I (Lionel) and what do I believe in ?
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/who-am-i-lionel…

MARCH 21, 2017

Vatican Council II has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus but the Angelicum hides this Catholic teaching
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/vatican-council…

MARCH 19, 2017

Rapid Response Team needed at the Angelicum University : unethical academics teach factual and objective errors
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/rapid-response-…

MARCH 20, 2017

VATICAN STOP THE DECEPTION AT THE ANGELICUM UNIVERSITY eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/vatican-stop-de…

MARCH 22, 2017

The Angelicum University does not come to Vatican Council II knowing that the baptism of desire cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : since then the interpretation of the Council changes
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-angelicum-u…