This is Pope Francis' political speciousness.Cushingism divides. Cushingism creates a new doctrine.New doctrines on salvation and morals is ideology
This is Pope Francis' political speciousness.Cushingism divides. Cushingism creates a new doctrine.New doctrines on salvation and morals is ideology.
Pope Francis \ Homilies
Pope Francis: doctrine unites, ideology divides Pope Francis delivers the homily at the daily
Mass at the Casa Santa Marta.
(Vatican Radio) True doctrine unites; ideology divides. That was the
message of Pope Francis in the homily at the morning Mass at the
Casa Santa Marta on Friday.
Lionel: Pope Francis teaches false doctrine. He also uses a
false theology.This is ideology. This is a new ideology in the Church,it is a sin, a mortal sin. Satan
supports it.He contradicts the popes and the magisterium of the past and calls it 'a development'.It is a new revelation in
the Church, a false revelation which opposes the de fide teachings
of the Church inspired by the Holy Spirit.
____________________________
The Pope based his reflections on the so-called Council of Jerusalem which, around the year 49 A.D., decided that gentile converts to Christianity would not have to be circumcised.The Holy Father was commenting on the First Reading, from the Acts of the Apostles. He noted that even in the first Christian community “there were jealousies, power struggles, a certain deviousness that wanted to profit from and to buy power.” There are always problems, he said: “We are human, we are sinners” and there are difficulties, even in the Church. But being sinners leads to humility and to drawing close to the Lord, as Saviour who saves us from our sins. With regard to the gentiles who the Spirit called to become Christians, the Holy Father recalled that, in the reading, the apostles and the elders chose several people to go to Antioch together with Paul and Barnabas. The reading describes two different kinds of people: those who had “forceful discussions” but with “a good spirit,” on the one hand; and those who “sowed confusion”:
“The group of the apostles who want to discuss the problem, and the others who go and create problems. They divide, they divide the Church, they say that what the Apostles preached is not what Jesus said, that it is not the truth.”
Lionel: The two popes now infer that what the Apostles, Church Fathers and Medieval Church Fathers taught, is not what Jesus taught.Instead they say that their new 'developed doctines' and theology is what Jesus meant to have taught.The two popes are praised by the Masons and the Jewish Left who affirm pro-Satanic sodomy, abortion, pornography, persecution of the Catholic Church...
The Apostles discussed the situation among themselves, and
in the end came to an agreement:
“But it is not a political agreement; it is the inspiration of the Holy Spirit that leads them to say: no things, no necessities. Only those who say: don’t eat meat at the time, meat sacrificed to idols, because that was communion with the idols; abstain from blood, from animals that were strangled, and from illegitimate unions.”
The Pope pointed to the “liberty of the Spirit” that leads to agreement: so, he said, the gentiles were allowed to enter the Church without having to undergo circumcision. It was at the heart of the “first Council” of the Church: the Holy Spirit and they, the Pope with the Bishops, all together,” gathered together in order “to clarify the doctrine;” and later, through the centuries – as at Ephesus or at Vatican II – because “it is a duty of the Church to clarify the doctrine,” so that “what Jesus said in the Gospels, what is the Spirit of the Gospels, would be understood well”:
Lionel: At Ephesus they clarfied doctrine at Vatican Council II they changed it.At Vatican Council II they used a false premise to create a new and non traditional conclusion. With this irrational philosophy a new theology was created.With this innovation interpret all magisterial documents past and present.
With this false theology Pope Benedict XVI announced that Vatican
Council II was 'a development' and it contradicted the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known in the 16th century and of course,to the Church Fathers and the Apostles.
Pope Benedict also meant that when he interprets the dogma outside
the church there is no salvation, he assumes that the baptism of desire
and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refers to
visible in the flesh cases(Christianity and the World Religions,
ITC,Vatican).This is Cushingism as opposed to traditional Feeneyism.So he supports the error of the magisterium in the
Letter of the Holy Offfice 1949.Cardinal Francesco Marchetti
Selvaggiani mistook invisible baptism of desire as being visible.Then he inferred that hypothetical cases were explicit exceptins to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits accepted this error and made it the theology of Vatican Council II.
Similarly Pope Benedict means that LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc refer to visible cases in 2016 saved without the baptism of water. So Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the dogma outside the Church no salvation and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.He will not affirm Feeneyiteextra ecclesiam nulla salusand neither will he affirm Feeenyite Vatican Council II. Since this would be opposing the leftist ideology for the Catholic Church. This is the ideology approved by the liberal rabbis representing Israel.This is the ideology Pope Francis sells.. He permits the liturgy of the Tridentine Rite Mass only with this ideology.The SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate will be welcomed into the Church only when they accept this Cushingite ideology in the interpretation of magisterial documents.
________________________________________________
“But there were always people who without any commission go
out to disturb the Christian community with speeches that
upset souls: ‘Eh, no, someone who says that is a heretic,
you can’t say this, or that; this is the doctrine of the Church.’
Lionel: Jesus is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow, objective reality does not change in the Church, the Holy Spirit cannot contradict Himself.However the pope is a heretic when he says conscience is supreme and there is no objective reality.
Objective reality says all non Catholics are on the way to Hell, he and the Jesuits, say not all, but only 'those who know.' Then they infer that 'they know who knows' and suggest that most people in ignorance will be saved.So there is no need for traditional Mission for them.
Pope Francis is a first class heretic when he changes the Nicene Creed in which we pray 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'.It refers to one known baptism, for me, and not three or more.
He is a heretic when he rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, in harmony with the Apostles and Church Fathers and calls it 'triumphalism'.He approves a new Cushingite version of the dogma on salvation. which is a new doctine in the Church. It is political ideology.
He is a heretic in morals too when he permits the Eucharist to
be given to numerous people in manifest mortal sin the latest being in the cathedral in Toronto.
He is my pope but he is also in heresy as is Pope Benedict.The heresy on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is widepread and is shared by Catholic traditionalists and conservatives too who use Cushingism as a theology.
___________________________
And they are fanatics of things that are not clear,
like those fanatics who go there sowing weeds in order to divide the Christian community. And this is the problem: when the doctrine of the Church, that which comes from the Gospel, that which the Holy Spirit inspires – because Jesus said, “He will teach us and remind you of all that I have taught’ – [when] that doctrine becomes an ideology. And this is the great error of those people.”
Lionel: There are also liberal fanatics,who have brought in an innovation in the Church with their Cushingite theology. They are the new fascists. Those priests who oppose it in Rome for example( now under control of the liberal rabbis) will lose their incardination. Ecclesiastic Masonry will suspend a priest who interprets Vatican Counci II with Feeneyism. They enforce their new ideology based on the New Theology.
All religious communities have to claim invisible people are visible on earth to remain in good standing with the 'new church'.
The cardinals and bishops appear corrupt like the magisterium. Otherwise they would oppose Cushingism and the false church within the Catholic Church.
______________________
These individuals, the Pope explained, “were not believers, they were ideologized,” they had an ideology that closed the heart to the work of the Holy Spirit.
Lionel: Oh no we are believers, we are not saying anything new. I for one, affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the missionaries in the 16th century and not the two liberal , pro- Mason popes.I reject their ideology.
Pope John Paul II is still my favourite pope and the last of the grand popes.
I affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism(LG 16 refers to an invisible case
in 2017) and so the Council is not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of
Pope Pius IX and the past ecclesiology of the 16th magisterium. I would
appeal to all the cardinals to interpret Vatican Council II like me an
oppose the ideology of the Mssons and the two popes in line with them.
I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but affirm it with Feeneyite reasoning( invisible people in reality cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
________________________________________
The Apostles, on the other hand, certainly discussed things forcefully, but they were not ideologized: “They had hearts open to what the Holy Spirit said. And after the discussion ‘it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us.’”
Lionel: The Holy Spirit has not given us a new revelation. However with irrational Cushingism Vatican Council II has a non traditional conclusion. This conclusion created with a false premise, is projected by the two
popes, as the work of the Holy Spirit and a new revelation in the Church. They simply call it ' a development'.This is a new spirit in the Church and it is un-holy.
___________________________________________
Pope Francis’ final exhortation was to not be afraid in the face “of the opinions of the ideologues of doctrine.”
Lionel: We will be there to let you know that we still exist.We will oppose, until death, your leftist ideology in the Catholic Church.We will have to welcome the time when a Holy Father along with the secular, pro-Satan, authorities sends us to prison and death. We must oppose the ideologues of newdoctrine.
______________________________________________
The Church, he concluded, has “its proper Magisterium,
the Magisterium of the Pope, of the Bishops, of the Councils,”
Lionel: The present magisterium opposes the magisterium of the 16th
century Catholic Church.This is official according to Pope Benedict
XVI's interview in the Avvenire in March 2016.This was a public
statement.So one of the two magisterium's has to be wrong. One has to be in heresy. One has to be false.I will affirm the 16th century magisterium on this issue.
_______________________________________________
and we must go along the path “that comes from the preaching of Jesus, and from the teaching and assistance of the Holy Spirit,” which is “always open, always free,” because “doctrine unites, the Councils unite the Christian community, while, on the other hand, “ideology divides.”
Lionel: This is political speciousness.Cushingism divides. Cushingism creates a new doctrine.New doctrines on salvation and morals is ideology. It is the ideology of the two popes and many cardinals and bishops.It is a rupture with the Church Fathers and Jesus ' teachings to the Apostles.It is not Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
