Lefebvrists chide pope over visit to immigrant island
Photo ~ Lampedusa is part of Sicilian territory, the isolated island of 5000 inhabitants is less than 115 kilometres from the coast of Tunisia, making it a beacon for asylum seekers fleeing the poverty …More
Photo ~ Lampedusa is part of Sicilian territory, the isolated island of 5000 inhabitants is less than 115 kilometres from the coast of Tunisia, making it a beacon for asylum seekers fleeing the poverty and violence that has accompanied the Arab Spring. Of the 7913 refugees who arrived on the Italian coast in the first six months of this year, 3648 landed on Lampedusa.
Rome, July 16 - The Italian chapter of the Catholic traditionalist Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) rebuked Pope Francis on Tuesday for visiting immigrants and refugees on the island of Lampedusa.
In a statement, the Lefebvrist breakaway group criticized the pope for going against centuries of Church efforts to "preserve Catholicism" in the face of the "Mohammedan invasion," recalling "popes, among whom many saints, who armed fleets to stop the (armed, of course) Muslims in Italy".
Last week Francis chose Lampedusa, an island off the coast of Sicily, as the destination for his first official trip as pope, drawing attention …More
Rome, July 16 - The Italian chapter of the Catholic traditionalist Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) rebuked Pope Francis on Tuesday for visiting immigrants and refugees on the island of Lampedusa.
In a statement, the Lefebvrist breakaway group criticized the pope for going against centuries of Church efforts to "preserve Catholicism" in the face of the "Mohammedan invasion," recalling "popes, among whom many saints, who armed fleets to stop the (armed, of course) Muslims in Italy".
Last week Francis chose Lampedusa, an island off the coast of Sicily, as the destination for his first official trip as pope, drawing attention …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
sanctus333
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The last paragraph is a complete lie. The SSPX didn't 'break away from the Church.' The Novus Ordo broke away from the true faith. The Second Vatican Council is non-dogmatic and non-binding. What is binding is the Council of Trent and the First Vatican Council. Both of these councils have already condemned the new mass, have condemned the very heresies and errors that are within the Second Vatican …More
The last paragraph is a complete lie. The SSPX didn't 'break away from the Church.' The Novus Ordo broke away from the true faith. The Second Vatican Council is non-dogmatic and non-binding. What is binding is the Council of Trent and the First Vatican Council. Both of these councils have already condemned the new mass, have condemned the very heresies and errors that are within the Second Vatican Council which was not even a Council since it did not define dogma nor did it condemn errors. No legitimate Church Council in History ever did such a thing. What is even more ridiculous about Vatican II is that you had the most brutal, godless system of government (Atheistic Communism) in history and there is not one ANATHEMA against their errors! Can one even say Vatican II was a legitimate council of the Church? We have seen the bad fruits, Vatican II was illegitimate and needs to be anathematized and set on fire in the middle of St. Peter's square along with the bodies of several deceased popes who helped destroy the faith and damn the souls of untold millions.
holyrope 3
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Can a good Muslim be a good American?
That question was forwarded to a person that worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his forwarded reply:
Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon God of Arabia.
Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)
Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which …More
Can a good Muslim be a good American?
That question was forwarded to a person that worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his forwarded reply:
Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon God of Arabia.
Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)
Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews. (Quran 5:51)
Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.
Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)
Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist.
Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic..
That question was forwarded to a person that worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his forwarded reply:
Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon God of Arabia.
Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)
Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews. (Quran 5:51)
Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.
Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)
Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist.
Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic..
lukedaniel
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Practice to mercy to Muslims, when their Quran tells them to kill Christians. Convert them? Their whole goal is to convert the world to Islam. Since 2000 there has been an increase of 74% of mosques built just in The USA.
baocongchen
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
We Christians should follow Jesus,practice mercy toward Muslims and convert them into Catholics in a peaceful way 
