"I'd like to know why you assume I'm female."

I was being charitable.

Ludovic is correct. Until Fatima is OBEYED, it will only get worse. Where is the devotion to the Blessed Virgin that our Lord wishes and that He laid out as to how to bring forth? Where is the conversion of Russia? Where is the promised period of peace? Either our Lady was a liar or the conditions haven't been fulfilled (effeminate blabbermouths on this site notwithstanding). If you have eyes, see. Will the Lord capitulate on His instruction? Only an imbecile would think so. We do what He wishes or reap it.

You still haven't named one you snotty pompous ass. If Bergolio would murder, get venereal disease, or sire children, you would have a point. But as usual, you don't. And you're too stupid to see the chasm between Bergoglio and ALL of his predecessors.

And as info the hissy fits are not very becoming. You're liable to break a nail typing so much.

"There have been many, many "Francis'" before Francis"

Really? Name one you lunatic. Honorius? The Borgias?

So "scientists", by your own admission, were divided as to whether adding CO2 to the atmosphere would turn the earth into an ice cube or an inferno. Rather extreme conclusions drawn from the same premise, wouldn't you say? Even under the best case scenario which is to assume that the "scientists" were all well intended, the only reasonable conclusion to draw, based on your own presentation, is that the reliability of climate science in it's current state is near zero. Certainly not worthy of being used as a basis of reinventing an entire global economy, again, based on your own testimony.

Unless there's something else afoot?

"It is not illegal anymore to be a homosexual" Well you can breathe a sigh of relief, at least for now, as it's status in eternity has never changed. Perhaps you should phone the DA to explain to him why he shouldn't waste his time investigating? Or perhaps he knows a bit more about the law than you do? Or perhaps putting pressure on homo-predation is a GOOD thing, regardless of erroneous legal technicalities? Don't you have anything better to do?

"The best I can do is emulate your good example and manfully toil on..."

I'll give it to you on that. You gave me a laugh.

You're the one race baiting. But that's what you do, isn't it? There's a saying in my country: when all you have is a hammer, every issue looks like a nail. And as a result of idiotic commentary like yours, all vile crime involving whites (as victims not perpetrators) and non-whites as perpetrators need be ignored unless the silly, racist finger waggers like you come out from beneath your rocks to point your fingers and whine about racism. "Virtue signalling" like what you are doing is in reality stupidity signalling. You're a disgrace. Blocked.

This woman is about as much of a bishop as those shrubs next to the building are. Doesn't Nickless know that? If he does know that (and he should), why does he support the heretical mockery of the Sacrament of Holy Orders? Perhaps he does know but simply doesn't believe it. No Catholic conviction at all. This is what modernism has given us for shepherds: empty cassocks. Lay down the truth and the faith, pretend those in error are not in error, all in order to burn incense before the god of all gods: VII 'ecumenism'.