dallas75216
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
“Satan is alive and well and very active in the Vatican”
Smeaton, why dont you be a man, resign from the committee and join a schismatic cult
Their is nothing more offensive that saying "Satan is alive an active in the Vatican"
The first one I can source to this statement is that fraud Malachi Martin.
I hope he made millions of dollars with his rubbish. He broke his vows, His obituary in the New York Times points out that Martin lived with a female …More
Smeaton, why dont you be a man, resign from the committee and join a schismatic cult
Their is nothing more offensive that saying "Satan is alive an active in the Vatican"
The first one I can source to this statement is that fraud Malachi Martin.
I hope he made millions of dollars with his rubbish. He broke his vows, His obituary in the New York Times points out that Martin lived with a female companion. In a few words he was a very nasty man
As for Smeatons judgement on Bishops and Cardinals and habitual mortal sin, he needs to dust off his Baltimore Catechism and read it.
71. How can a sin be venial?
A sin can be venial in two ways:
when the evil done is not seriously wrong;
when the evil done is seriously wrong, but the sinner sincerely believes it is only slightly wrong, or does not give full consent to it. (eg Fee Will,)
More than a little sick tired and disgusted with so called slandering "Traditionalists"
about as traditional as the nuerotic priests, Calvin. Luther and Knox.
Their is nothing more offensive that saying "Satan is alive an active in the Vatican"
The first one I can source to this statement is that fraud Malachi Martin.
I hope he made millions of dollars with his rubbish. He broke his vows, His obituary in the New York Times points out that Martin lived with a female companion. In a few words he was a very nasty man
As for Smeatons judgement on Bishops and Cardinals and habitual mortal sin, he needs to dust off his Baltimore Catechism and read it.
71. How can a sin be venial?
A sin can be venial in two ways:
when the evil done is not seriously wrong;
when the evil done is seriously wrong, but the sinner sincerely believes it is only slightly wrong, or does not give full consent to it. (eg Fee Will,)
More than a little sick tired and disgusted with so called slandering "Traditionalists"
about as traditional as the nuerotic priests, Calvin. Luther and Knox.