Bishop Athanasius Schneider is bankrupt theologically his doctrines are a rupture with Tradition .Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is controversial for him
Bishop Athanasius Schneider is bankrupt theologically and so his doctrines are a rupture with Tradition.He interprets all magisterial documents with the New Theology. He does the same as the liberal bishops. Is he aware of interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise?.Since LG 16 is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), his inference, whether he knows it or not,is that LG 16 refers to concrete people, known people in the present times,saved outside the Church.This is irrational. How can LG 16 be a reference to someone visible in 2017? Who among us can see someone saved without the baptism of water and in invincible ignorance(I.I) ? No one.Yet upon this irrationality is built the New Theology of Pope Benedict and Bishop Athanasius Schneider.They use it to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past. So he keeps repeating the same old interpretation of Vatican Council II and does not respond to the points I have made on my blog.Nor does he respond to the e-mails I have sent him. Soon he will be invited to England by Cushingite traditionalists there and he will repeat the same nonsense theology and interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.He will present with charity, mildness and kindness a false theology with new doctrines. He will not affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise.Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) is 'too hot'. It will bring a backlash and this would not be 'charity' for him. Charity means repeating the false theology since it is magisterial and is being accepted also by the SSPX bishops and it is non controversial. So general, vague statements are being on Vatian Council II by him,in yesterday's report posted on Rorate Caeili, without affirming the issues, he mentions, with Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).He will not support Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) on ecumenism, religious liberty, collegiality, inter religious dialogue, non separation of Church and State, proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation,the rejection of the new ecumenism, the support of the old ecclesiology etc. Probably he will go to the other life, like Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari, avoiding this issue and remaining politically correct , with Cushingite theology. -Lionel Andrades
I am sorry to disappoint you again. One of the people whom you admire is using the New Theology, he assumes invisible for us baptism of desire is a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This violates the Principle of Non Contradiction. Then he assumes that invisible for us LG 16 ( invincible ignorance) is a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the …More
I am sorry to disappoint you again. One of the people whom you admire is using the New Theology, he assumes invisible for us baptism of desire is a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This violates the Principle of Non Contradiction. Then he assumes that invisible for us LG 16 ( invincible ignorance) is a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition. Again he violates the Principle of Non Contradiction like your Polish bishops. With this irrationality, invisible and hypothetical cases are defacto and known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Tradition, he rejects Vatican Council II.The problem is there with his premise and not the Council. On the other hand he does not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in which invisible for us baptism of desire would be invisible for us !.So LG 16 etc would not be an exception to the dogma EENS. Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with Tradition. There would be no violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction. However like Rorate Caeili and the other Cushingite traditionalists, he does not want to say that all the non Catholics in Kazakhistan, according to Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) are on the way to Hell. So he and Rorate Caeili continue to give us the fake news on Vatican Council II. This has been going on for years.
Lionel L. Andrades you are publicly undermining the authority of Catholic Bishop Schneider who "co-manages" the resistance against the antichurch. Any theological disputes should be done with prudence according to way our Lord has demanded. I have also proven you err by repealing one of the pillars of classical logic, which is law of noncontradiction, in your arguments and cognition of present crisis …More
Lionel L. Andrades you are publicly undermining the authority of Catholic Bishop Schneider who "co-manages" the resistance against the antichurch. Any theological disputes should be done with prudence according to way our Lord has demanded. I have also proven you err by repealing one of the pillars of classical logic, which is law of noncontradiction, in your arguments and cognition of present crisis. Your discourse methodology is anarchical in line with neomarxist Horkheimer's critical theory calling for total opposition against authority. What you have written about Bishop Schneider is a distorted lie based on your biased misinterpretataion and cognitive error on solution to present crisis. You are infecting catholic souls and minds with confusion. Stop acting like a narrow minded ideologue.
