Think it out... he couldn't be in schism.

One is in schism when one rejects the legitimate authority of the Catholic Pope.
Only members of the Catholic Church can be Pope.

Heretics are not members of the Catholic Church.
Heretics cannot be the Catholic Pope.
Bergoglio is a Heretic and not a member of the Catholic Church.
Bergoglio cannot be the Catholic Pope.
Bergoglio is a putative pope, an anti-pope, without the legitimate authority of the Catholic Pope.

Therefore, Viganò cannot be in schism.

6LikeShare

samtheman

Jul 3

Mike, didn't Malachi Martin hint at this possibility, perhaps about Fatima secret or some other medium? Didn't he say Catholics will have to choose between two different churches?

Live Mike

Jul 3edited

He did indeed samtheman. Several times in fact. Once with Father Paul Kramer regarding the Third Secret of Fatima, once during an interview with Traditional Catholic Bernard Janzen from Canada and another time during a public lecture in front of a small group of Catholics circa 1989-1992. I'm not aware of Malachi Martin ever saying specifically that "Catholics will have to choose between two different churches" but he may very well have done so. However, I do recall him saying many times that Catholics were / are being led by the nose out of the Church (understood as the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church).

Bazsó-Dombi Attila

Jul 1edited

Bergoglio is not a "simple" heretic, but he is a notoriuous apostate, which reality is a far stronger argument that he can't be valid Pope!