en.news

Mass in Roman Rite: New Evidence against Vatican Spokesman Matteo Bruni

American journalist Diane Montagna published additional information on the 2021 report of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith about the Mass in the Roman rite (Substack.com, July 20).

She revealed the protocol number of the full report: N. 03/2020-ED, thus confirming its authenticity.

The Congregation's report, dated 22 February 2021, consists of three parts: a statistical analysis (pp. 11–170); a summary by continent and an overall evaluation (pp. 171–184); and an appendix containing quotations from the bishops (the Florilegium).

Montagna today also published the introduction to Part Two of the report. It confirms that the majority of bishops indeed warned that restricting the Mass in the Roman rite would cause more harm than good. Therefore, Francis lied when he claimed that the bishops had demanded that he crack down on the Roman rite.

Montagna’s new publication contradicts statements made by Vatican press spokesman Matteo Bruni on 3 July.

During that day's press conference, Monsignor Vittorio Francesco Viola, secretary of the Dicastery for Divine Worship, was asked about the report. He was unable to answer and remained silent.

Bruni then interrupted, saying: "I don't think that's a relevant question." However, he added that Montagna’s sources were "very partial and incomplete" and that "other documentation and confidential reports, including the results of further consultations received by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, were subsequently added to the cited consultation".

Today, after publishing her evidence, Montagna concluded that it is now Bruni’s burden to prove that the alleged further documents "either wholly contradict or seriously undermine what is written in the Congregation’s report".

She added that Bruni must demonstrate that his documents prove the Congregation’s report inaccurately represented the responses of bishops worldwide to the questionnaire and that Pope Francis had indeed the support of most responding bishops in issuing 'Traditionis Custodes'.

#newsRnlmsflcif
121.4K
Novena - Oremus shares this

The Vatican needs to take control of the narrative and defend the legacy of Pope Francis by publishing the results of the Summorum Pontificum survey of Bishops in full.

1206
SonoftheChurch

“…defend the legacy of Pope Francis.” 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

American journalist Diane Montagna confirms that most bishops warned Bergoglio that restricting the Mass to the Roman rite would cause more harm than good. Therefore, Bergoglio AKA Francis lied when he claimed that the bishops had demanded that he crack down on the Roman rite.
Monsignor Bux: "The Bishops weren't responsible for launching the War Against Tradition."

Apostate gay priests hate the Tridentine Mass …

Bergoglio lied when he claimed that the bishops had demanded that he crack down on the Roman rite
Bergoglio, the greatest scourge of the Church of Christ: "For twelve long years he expressed the most radical moral and religious relativism... and fierce hatred of the Truth."
Bergoglio, a plague of Egypt for the Argentine Church, or the seven plagues together.

What a brilliant and honest journalist. I _love_ that she issued a challenge to Bruni to prove what she has found and published is not what she found, that is, a lie about what the Church in her priests and bishops believed that limiting the Traditional Mass would cause turmoil and more harm than good.

May I challenge: She is turning the story subtly around her person - what Don Bux did not, although he had the material, too.

She is keeping this issue in the light of day.

That's why he is the false prophet and his spirit continues to guide the wolves in Rome

john333

What about contradicting the Holy Ghost ,St Paul warned us about wolves hold on to the traditions I handed on to you
Freemasons, communism over hundred years of papal teaching and we are still so naive.

I don't understand, St. Paul warned us about wolves hold on to the traditions handed down by Jesus?

yuca2111

Does anyone, with deep love for the Church thinks, that Francis I showed any little care for truth? He bended the rules, lied, persecuted, chastised and made his own rules in order to have his way. Francis I behavior was nothing short of a little antichrist behavior, the likes of Mao and Hitler is just that there wasn’t any assasinations of the flesh, just of the soul, which is worse.
The dark days of the false sect is stil happening under Francis II rule (Leo XIV), false sect / false church has the leadership BUT nobody wants to listen about it, anyways, this evidence is important, but not surprising.