CARDINAL FERNANDEZ, BISHOP PETER LIBASI AND FR. GEORGES LAIRE, TRY TO FORCE VATICAN COUNCIL II RED UPON A RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY WHICH CHOOSES VATICAN COUNCIL II, BLUE
23.12.2025CARDINAL FERNANDEZ, BISHOP PETER LIBASI AND FR. GEORGES LAIRE, TRY TO FORCE VATICAN COUNCIL II RED UPON A RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY WHICH CHOOSES VATICAN COUNCIL II, BLUE
Sister Marie Philomena micm, Directoress of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom in New Hampshire is a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II.For her it is Vatican Council II, blue.
Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, must clarify for the people in NH if he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism, red or blue, irrational or rational, and is this honest, Catholic and legal.
He presently forces the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, to also interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism. He expects all Catholic educational institutions and all the religious communities and organizations in New Hampshire, to be dishonest with Vatican Council II, red. Sister Marie Philomena micm, Directoress of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom in New Hampshire is a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II.For her it is Vatican Council II, blue.
Pope Leo, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, NH and the Judicial Vicar in NH, Fr. Georges de Laire, interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.
In the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire,USA, they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8,14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. In other words, they refer to physically visible cases; known people saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times. Only in this way they could be practical exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. But we know that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, etc refer to only hypothetical cases for us. So they are not exceptions for an ecumenism of return to the Church, of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
Vatican Council II (LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3 etc) does not contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q-outside the Church no salvation).
The Council is not a break with Tradition for me. We have a choice in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. We can interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as referring to invisible or visible cases in 1965-2023.
Fr. John Hardon sj., Fr. William Most, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Ludwig Ott interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referred to physically visible cases. This was the objective mistake of also the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
In principle a pope,bishop and vicar general must affirm Vatican Council II blue and not red.He must be a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite.A Cushingite cannot be a pope. Since Cushingism produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It produces heresy and schism.
Presently the whole Church is infected with Cushingism. Cushingites accept Magisterial Documents but always interpret them irrationally. Pope Pius XII was a Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. Pope Francis was a Cushingite in Traditionis Custode and Amoris Laetitia. Also Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was a Cushingite on Vatican Council II..- Lionel Andrades
Four-Year Program | staugustineinstitute
22.12.2025 WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II ‘BLUE’ THE MINIM FATHERS IN ROME ARE ALIGNED WITH ALPHONSE RATISBONNE AND TERESA DI LISEUX : THE COUNCIL IS MISSIONARY WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II ‘BLUE’ THE MINIM FATHERS …
WZ3aXe
FR.CHAD RIPPERGER, JESSE ROMERO AND TERRY BARBER AFFIRM THE DOGMA EENS WHICH IS IN HARMONY WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II (BLUE) AND THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH - BUT WITH CONFUSION. The 15 hypothetical cases could be confused as practical exceptions FR. CHAD RIPPERGER, JESSE ROMERO AND TERRY …
20.12.2025 FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C LUMEN GENTIUM 16 REFERS TO AN INVISIBLE CASE SO IT IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE ATHANASIUS CREED WHICH IS SUPPORTED BY AD GENTES 7 FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C LUMEN GENTIUM …
22.12.2025 FOR MOTHER TERESA IT WAS VATICAN COUNCIL RED BUT FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C AND FR. JAN TIMOR M.C IT IS VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE. At every Mass and liturgy the Council is no more liberal. FOR MOTHER TERESA IT WAS VATICAN COUNCIL RED BUT …
22.12.2025 WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II ‘BLUE’ THE MINIM FATHERS IN ROME ARE ALIGNED WITH ALPHONSE RATISBONNE AND TERESA DI LISEUX : THE COUNCIL IS MISSIONARY WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II ‘BLUE’ THE MINIM FATHERS …
15.12.2025 TRADITIONALISTS NOW HAVE A NEW VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II. THE COUNCIL IS ALIGNED WITH THE MIDDLE AGES.The text is still the same but the conclusion is different. TRADITIONALISTS NOW HAVE A NEW VERSION OF …
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial. How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations. Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA