en.news

Francis' Homosexual Subversion Already Began in Buenos Aires

Henry Sire, author of The Dictator Pope (2018), gave a talk on Francis in London on 24 November (OnePeterFive.com, 11 December). Main points.

- As early as 2013, reports from the Vatican showed that Francis was different from his media image: arrogant, dismissive of people, prone to foul language and temper tantrums.

- Public relations expert Omar Bello worked with Cardinal Bergoglio for years. Bello described him as skilled in the covert exercise of power and the manipulation of people.

- While still in Buenos Aires, Bergoglio ordered the dismissal of Felix Botazzi, a member of his archdiocesan staff. But when he met Botazzi, he told him: "I knew nothing about it, my son. Why did they dismiss you? Who did it?"

- In 1997, Monsignor Roberto Toledo of the Buenos Aires Curia forged Cardinal Quarracino's signature on financial transactions. The fraud was not discovered until Bergoglio took over the archdiocese. Toledo was found guilty. Bergoglio made sure that Toledo, a homosexual with a sports teacher as his lover, was not touched but was given a parish.

- In August 2005, Benedict XVI accepted the resignation of the anti-Catholic bishop of Santiago del Estero, Juan Carlos Maccarone, who was found to be having homosexual relations with his 23-year-old chauffeur. Cardinal Bergoglio publicly defended Maccarone.

- Bergoglio also defended notorious homosexual abusers such as the famous priest Julio Grassi or the Buenos Aires priest Rubén Pardo. The latter was reported to have abused a fifteen-year-old male teenager. Bergoglio placed him in a diocesan residence and refused to meet the teenager's mother. Pardo was later convicted and died shortly afterwards of AIDS.

- Cardinal Bergoglio surrounded himself with morally corrupt people which he could easily control.

- In Rome, Bergoglio removed people of integrity out of the Curia (Burke, Sarah, Müller, Pell) and replaced them with an unprecedented collection of clerical villains.

- Francis understands that the only obstacle to his subversion comes from Catholics who have seen that the emperor has no clothes, hence Bergoglio's smear campaign against the Catholics whom he calls "rigid" and "backward".

- In the last three months the downward spiral has accelerated as Francis desperately tries to institutionalise his subversion before he dies.

- One example is the protection of Father Marko Rupnik, a priest accused of decades of sexual abuse of adults, including sacrilegious elements.

- Another example is Francis' climate superstition. He wrote in Laudate Deum: "It is no longer possible to deny the primarily human cause of climate change."

- He tacitly accepts the demands of the German Synod, including the homosexual "blessing".

- He removed Bishop Strickland of Tyler for not toeing the line of the Bergoglio party.

- He wanted the Ex-Synod on Synodality to institutionalise the current subversion.

- He has plans to change the rules for papal conclaves to introduce lay participation, including women.

Picture: © Joseph Shaw, CC BY-NC-ND, #newsNicipiizrm

82.3K

Precisely because of Bergoglio's previous heresy and apostasy, this enemy of God and the Church is disqualified from being pope.
The Magisterium of the Church holds the authority to depose the heresiarch and apostate Jorge Mario Bergoglio
“Cum ex Apostolatus Officio” – Apostolic Constitution of Pope Paul IV About the Danger of Heretical Authorities
6. In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity We enact, determine, decree and define:] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:

(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless;
(ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation;
(iii) it shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way;
(iv) to any so promoted to be Bishops, or Archbishops, or Patriarchs, or Primates or elevated as Cardinals, or as Roman Pontiff, no authority shall have been granted, nor shall it be considered to have been so granted either in the spiritual or the temporal domain;
(v) each and all of their words, deeds, actions and enactments, howsoever made, and anything whatsoever to which these may give rise, shall be without force and shall grant no stability whatsoever nor any right to anyone;
(vi) those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power.

In 2010, Argentine professor Antonio Caponnetto published a book titled The Church Betrayed. In it, he revealed to readers about the betrayal of the apostate Jorge Bergoglio.

Tony M

It would be fanciful to think Bergoglio became a heretic only after he took the Chair of Peter in 2013.
The evidence is that he was thoroughly entrenched in his heretical ways for decades before that.
It is not possible that God could have accepted the election of a heretic.
All of the laws surrounding election of a Pope are there to ensure that this does not happen.
My impression after much reading on this topic is that just about every single Canon Law and Apostolic Constitution law directly relating to Bergoglio taking (stealing) the Chair of Peter.....was broken!!!
God will not be mocked!!!

Sandy Barrett shares this

Henry Sire on Francis: A trajectory of power, betrayal, and controversy

204
Wilma Lopez

"...how much lower can we sink?"
"...Insiders were saying that, as soon as the publicity cameras were off him, Francis became a different figure: arrogant, dismissive of people, given to foul language, and notorious for furious outbursts of temper which were known even to the Vatican chauffeurs."

Adrien

One of the worst outburst of rage that I saw from Francis Bergoglio, is what he did right at the end of the Mass on the feast of Divine Mercy in 2023, I went to look at it again on the Vatican's Youtube channel, and I think they cut it off.

John A Cassani

It makes me think of what he might have done to that poor altar boy, many years ago now, who had his hands properly folded. What if cameras weren’t on them? You could definitely argue that it was violence for him to pry that boy’s hands apart.

philosopher

I remember when a Chinese Catholic woman out of pius respect attempted to kiss the Pope's hand and he slapped her hand out of the way and scolded her. I could not hear what he was saying because the news camera was at a far distance but you could see the rage in his face. I thought how unbecoming for his office and mean spirited really!

Orthocat

Also remember went he went to "his people" in Mexico and when doing a walk-about among the faithful, he was belligerent to those who tried to touch him.