Condoms Are "Charity" for Francis’ Destroyer of Faith
Archbishop Victor Fernández believes that avoiding artificial contraception may in certain cases "contradict the Christian hierarchy of values crowned by charity."
When he was vice-dean of the Faculty of Theology at the "Catholic" University of Argentina, he wrote an article for the Revista Teología (April 2006), the quarterly of the Faculty of Theology whose director he was at the time, in which he constructed the case of a "believing" wife and her "unbelieving" husband who both don't want to have children, but the husband insists on having sex with his wife also when she is fertile.
According to Fernández, in this case it would be better for the wife to allow the use of condoms, since refusing sex would "endanger the stability of the family". The "grave obligation to care for the loving communion and stability of the marriage, which charity demands most directly” would be more important.
A woman is fertile for seven days a month. Apart from the contraсeptive mentality of both, Fernández doesn't notice that such a husband is a sexual pervert whose desire for sex is more important than respect for his wife.
This is a manual case for immoral "situational ethics", which believes that every crime can be turned into something "good" through interpretation.
Fernández thus trashes Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae, which condemns contraception as intrinsically evil.
#newsWykigbbdrr
When he was vice-dean of the Faculty of Theology at the "Catholic" University of Argentina, he wrote an article for the Revista Teología (April 2006), the quarterly of the Faculty of Theology whose director he was at the time, in which he constructed the case of a "believing" wife and her "unbelieving" husband who both don't want to have children, but the husband insists on having sex with his wife also when she is fertile.
According to Fernández, in this case it would be better for the wife to allow the use of condoms, since refusing sex would "endanger the stability of the family". The "grave obligation to care for the loving communion and stability of the marriage, which charity demands most directly” would be more important.
A woman is fertile for seven days a month. Apart from the contraсeptive mentality of both, Fernández doesn't notice that such a husband is a sexual pervert whose desire for sex is more important than respect for his wife.
This is a manual case for immoral "situational ethics", which believes that every crime can be turned into something "good" through interpretation.
Fernández thus trashes Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae, which condemns contraception as intrinsically evil.
#newsWykigbbdrr