Clicks1.7K

Father Paul Kramer: There is a 'defect of intention' in Benedict's act of renunciation; he is still the pope.

Father Paul Kramer said in a comment:
The knucklehead blogger is too obtuse to grasp that there is a 'defect of intention' in Benedict's act of renunciation; which is reinforced by his own words on 27 Feb 2013. Benedict explicitly stated his intention to not relinquish entirely the papal munus of office. Case closed. Benedict is still the pope. Within days after his renunciation, Mons. Gänswein emphasized that Benedict still considered himself in some limited capacity to be pope. He has now explained that more completely. What is incredible is that the "conservative" NO people and the semitrads (pseudotrads) are frothing at the mouth against the idea that Benedict is still the only man in white with a valid hold on the papacy. What they have all failed to notice is that Benedict has not issued any denial of what Gänswein has so publicly stated to be not his own opinion, but the mind of Pope Benedict himself. "Francis" has replied only an ambiguous one liner: "There is only one pope" -- but he did not say that the only one pope is himself!"

St. Vincent Ferrer O.P.
Sixth. It is true of faith that the pope has full authority over all. As Christ said to Peter: and whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven.(Mt. XVI, 19). If there were two popes at once one would have more power than the other, or not? If one did not have more power than the other, neither would be pope because the pope has authority over all, as stated above. If the lower had it he would not be pope. So the Lord promised speaking by Ezekiel: I will save my flock, and will never be prey to the nations; I will raise up for her only one pastor, who will shepherd them (Ez. XXXIV, 28 and 31). For all these reasons it is clear that it is wrong to believe that the two chosen in question are true popes. Therefore, erring very seriously who, in an effort to obtain graces and dispensations, or achieve any kind of privileges, go to each other, revering like real popes. For being true that both cannot be popes one of them is an apostate and anti-pope. It is clear that those in their pleas revere both as such; they can not escape to the penalties and curses prescribed at the canon of the Decree begins in the name of the Lord ...(J. Gratianus, Decretum (Concordantia discordantium canonum) 1, dist. 23, e. 1 : 44 In nomine Domini"). And no one can be excused in this ignorance, as will be seen in what follows. Link
la verdad prevalece
Sgarbi: i gay hanno fatto dimettere Ratzinger Can. 188 A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself. Rev. Kramer: «BERGOGLIO DEVE DIMETTERSI, IL VERO PAPA È BENEDETTO XVI, È STATO OBBLIGATO ALLE DIMISSIONI»
Francesco I
Ratzinger no podìa "Ni vender ni comprar".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Démission de Benoît XVI : Il dénonce « l’hypocrisie religieuse »
la verdad prevalece
Francesco I
Was Pope Benedict SWIFTed?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RATZINGER NÃO PODIA “VENDER NEM COMPRAR”
la verdad prevalece
Father Paul Kramer :
«The knuclehead blogger is too obtuse to grasp that there is a 'defect of intention' in Benedict's act of renunciation; which is reinforced by his own words on 27 Feb 2013. Benedict explicitly stated his intention to not relinquish entirely the papal munus of office. Case closed. Benedict is still the pope. Within days after his renunciation, Mons. Gänswein emphasized that …More
Father Paul Kramer :
«The knuclehead blogger is too obtuse to grasp that there is a 'defect of intention' in Benedict's act of renunciation; which is reinforced by his own words on 27 Feb 2013. Benedict explicitly stated his intention to not relinquish entirely the papal munus of office. Case closed. Benedict is still the pope. Within days after his renunciation, Mons. Gänswein emphasized that Benedict still considered himself in some limited capacity to be pope. He has now explained that more com...pletely. What is incredible is that the "conservative" NO people and the semitrads (pseudotrads) are frothing at the mouth against the idea that Benedict is still the only man in white with a valid hold on the papacy. What they have all failed to notice is that Benedict has not issued any denial of what Gänswein has so publicly stated to be not his own opinion, but the mind of Pope Benedict himself. "Francis" has replied only an ambiguous one liner: "There is only one pope" -- but he did not say that the only one pope is himself!
la verdad prevalece
adeste fideles 👍
✍️ Benedict has fled for fear to the wolves but has not ceased to be the only valid pope because he “did not intend to renounce the pontifical munus” which “is irrevocable”
adeste fideles
God doesn't make mistakes ✍️
la verdad prevalece
Paul Kramer The command of God is unequivocal: when the abomination of hereay is set up where the See of Peter had been set up as the light of the world, we must flee from that deadly plague: "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues." (Apoc. 18:4)
Pope Leo XIII's prophetic prayer:
"…More
Paul Kramer The command of God is unequivocal: when the abomination of hereay is set up where the See of Peter had been set up as the light of the world, we must flee from that deadly plague: "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues." (Apoc. 18:4)
Pope Leo XIII's prophetic prayer:
"Behold the Church, the Spouse of the Immaculate Lamb, filled with bitterness and inebriated with gall by the most crafty enemies; who have laid impious hands on all that is most sacred. Where the See of the most blessed Peter and the Chair of the truth, was constituted as the light of the nations, there they have set up the throne of their abominable impiety, so that the shepherd being struck, the sheep may be dispersed."
la verdad prevalece
Paul Kramer
2 h ·

BERGOGLIO MUST BE REJECTED
The Catholic may not just sit tight and wait for a future pope to rule on a matter which requires immediate action now. We must distinguish between the false pastors of the false church, and the true pastors of the Catholic Church. Now that the Enemy has taken control of the apparatus of the Holy See, we must denounce and condemn the wolves in …More
Paul Kramer
2 h ·

BERGOGLIO MUST BE REJECTED
The Catholic may not just sit tight and wait for a future pope to rule on a matter which requires immediate action now. We must distinguish between the false pastors of the false church, and the true pastors of the Catholic Church. Now that the Enemy has taken control of the apparatus of the Holy See, we must denounce and condemn the wolves in sheep's clothing; from whom the pastor has fled. We must separate ourselves from them; and have no bond of ...communion with them. Now that the "mystery of iniquity" with its "operation of error" has taken hold of the reins of power in the Vatican, we must sever all bonds with it, reject its heresies, and remain in full communion with the Catholic Church by adhering to her faith, sacraments and discipline.
The command of God is unequivocal: when the abomination of hereay is set up where the See of Peter had been set up as the light of the world, we must flee from that deadly plague: "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues." (Apoc. 18:4)
Pope Leo XIII's prophetic prayer:
"Behold the Church, the Spouse of the Immaculate Lamb, filled with bitterness and inebriated with gall by the most crafty enemies; who have laid impious hands on all that is most sacred. Where the See of the most blessed Peter and the Chair of the truth, was constituted as the light of the nations, there they have set up the throne of their abominable impiety, so that the shepherd being struck, the sheep may be dispersed."
One more comment from la verdad prevalece
la verdad prevalece
Archbishop Ganswein: “He left the Papal Throne and yet, with the step he took on 11 February 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, something "quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.“ He added that this is why Benedict XVI “has not given up his name”, unlike Pope Celestine V who reverted to his name Pietro da Marrone, “nor the white …More
Archbishop Ganswein: “He left the Papal Throne and yet, with the step he took on 11 February 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, something "quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.“ He added that this is why Benedict XVI “has not given up his name”, unlike Pope Celestine V who reverted to his name Pietro da Marrone, “nor the white cassock.”
“Therefore he has also not retired to a monastery in isolation but stays within the Vatican —