Well, when you have a globalist, corporatist, NWO that openly favors a behavior that most people in most cultures morally and culturally dislike (whether or not they might desire that homosexuals be harmed either - which even most anti-LGBTQXYZ conservative Christians do not) you will, necessarily, eventually foster a sense of resentment among the non-NOW-favored majority. This dynamic works the same with the NWO favoring of non-Western ethnic and religious groups concomitant with official disfavor of Western ethnic groups in Western countries as well.

Quite apart from the argument for/against allowing homosexuality and merely in terms of the future of politics in the West as a necessary and corrective back-lash develops against "Globo-Homo" generally I think homosexuals themselves should start signalling their opposition to that same NWO. If they fail to do so they will be increasingly seen as part of the One-World-er plot against national sovereignty, the family, and the idea of man as a true "anthromorphos" - "a being 'looking up' to transcendence beyond himself."

If the backlash should ever move beyond non-violent opposition to violence I should not like to be a homosexual (of heterosexual for that matter) "useful idiot" of the New World Order "ancien regime." This last I say not as any call to violence - to the contrary - but as one that has studied the past and also understands how both human nature and basic tribalism work.