What is sad is that he found no one at Mundelein to deal with his objections. Whoever told him that he must choose between the pre Vat II Church and the post Vat II Church qualifies as a moron.
Even his sedevacantist community has chosen error and none of them can defend themself theologically and doctrinally.They are using the new theology of the those whom they call disparagingly ' the Novus Ordo Church'.
Even his sedevantist community has chosen error, they follow the same new theology of the 'Novus Ordo Church', including that of Rockford. Sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada have still to say : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/sedevacantists-…More
Even his sedevantist community has chosen error, they follow the same new theology of the 'Novus Ordo Church', including that of Rockford.
Sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada have still to say : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/sedevacantists-…
Where did he go? I pray he will be brought into the fullness of God's truth. These beautiful priests are forced to make educated guesses as to where to go. I have met many priests that have chosen different paths. I am not qualified to know which is the right path when Rome encouragers error. I pray for protection and grace for Fr. Oswalt. and for all of us!
The sedevacantist community which he has joined also interprets magisterial documents with Cushinigite theology and so Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the rest of Tradition. They reject this conclusion while his former diocese accepts this rupture with the past. His sedevacantist bishop does not affirm Vatican Council II, the dogma extra …More
The sedevacantist community which he has joined also interprets magisterial documents with Cushinigite theology and so Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the rest of Tradition. They reject this conclusion while his former diocese accepts this rupture with the past. His sedevacantist bishop does not affirm Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and all the Catehisms with Feeneyism( invisible cases are not physically visible persons in 2017, the invisible baptism of desire is not a visible exception to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation).
