OCTOBER 8, 2017
Archbishop Guido Pozzo rejects the Syllabus of Errors with Vatican Council II and EENS interpreted with the false premise : SSPX must note the doctrinal error
The SSPX must clarify the doctrinal position of Archbishop Guido Pozzo, Archbishop Augustine Di Noia and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J since for them the Syllabus of Errors is redundant and superflous.It is the same also for Pope Benedict.
They have rejected the Syllabus of Errors and they do this by confusing invisible baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as being visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.The old eclusivist ecclesiology of the Church is put away with this mix up between what is visible and invisible, known and unknown.
With there being known salvation outside the Church for them ( with the false premise) there isa new ecumenism. It contradicts the Syllabus of Errors.
With there being known salvation outside the Church for them at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Ecclesia Dei offices at the Vatican,all non Christians do not need to enter the Church as members for salvation.Again the Syllabus of Errors is contradicted.
Cardinal Ratzinger always rejected the Syllabus of Errors and now Archbishop Pozzo, as Secretary of Ecclesia Dei is doing the same.
Visible for them LG 16, UR 3, LG 8, GS 22, NA 2 etc also contradict the past ecclesiology of the Church.So Vatican Council II(with the hypothetical cases are visible premise) is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors, for the cardinals and archbishops at the Vatican.
For me there is no known salvation outside the Church.This is the position the SSPX must choose.I cannot meet or see any one saved outside the Church.I cannot name any particular exception to EENS in the present time.
There are no practical exceptions to EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II and EENS are premise-free for me.They do notcontradict the Syllabus of Errors.
So I am affirming the Syllabus of Errors,Vatican Council II (premise-free) and EENS(premise-free).I am in harmony with the SSPX General Chapter Statement(2012) which affirmed EENS(premise-free).
But the SSPX have to note that Archbishop Guido Pozzo, Secretary of Ecclesia Dei rejects the Syllabus of Errors.He does this with Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational premise.
He may also want the SSPX to sign a doctrinal preamble which would indicate that in principle the SSPX accepts Vatican Council II, EENS and other magisterial documents interpreted with the irrational premise.-Lionel Andrades