"I'm a guy that you got banned." @Mike Yerian Nope. I'd love to take credit for it on my own. Best I can claim is only contributing to it. You've made a lot of friends here. ;-)

They're not all vocal, either. You argue with people, some of them back down, but they don't forget the way Big Mouth Jimmy was throwing his weight around.

"As such, I couldn't use my first account, which was my first and last name."

:D Even that's a lie. :D Your first account was "JMY45".

"If I tried that I couldn't get logged in."

...because you got banned for the same reason you keep getting banned.

"Hence the aliases, which most people, including YOU, have with no issues."

You don't speak for "most people". This is one of your standard tactics... Jimmy being Jimmy. Fact is, "most people" who run websites immediately ban new sock-puppet accounts from previously banned users.

GTV chooses to exercise Christian charity which you shamelessly abuse. Just because the admin puts up with your garbage (for now) doesn't mean "most people" approve you running differnt "aliases".

"And since you are obsessed with me..."

LOL. This again? Really? You pull this same rhetorical gimmick on @Mathathias Maccabeus all the time. "Yer obsessed with meeee..." You need new material, Jimmy. I've been telling you that for years now.

"You virtually threatened me with your investigative abilities, which aren't much."

You play the victim very badly and you're a liar. I've never threatened you, "virtually" or otherwise.

No, you went snooping after me in the physical world because you lost a few arguments online, Poor Jimmy. :P You didn't like it much when I took an (still friendly) interest in who was up to no good.

"I don't care what you know about me, what I care about, though is how you are allowed to be an unchristian, uncharitable menace here."

THIS from the guy who tries hunting someone down offline, just because he keeps losing debates on a Catholic forum. Then you piously whine about a "menace". Be grateful I'm not a spiteful maggot like you. I leave you and yours alone. I don't stoop to your level. I don't need to. That's loser behavior from a sore loser.

"and others get banned for stooping to that level."

Fact Check: You're the only one who keeps getting banned around here. :D

...for the same reason you always do. Crazy Jimmy ranting "heretical antipope Bergoglio" non-stop, day after day. You just refuse to accept 1.) that isn't Catholic 2.) that isn't acceptable on GTV 3.) this isn't your personal Ann Barnhardt recruiting center and fan-shrine.

"Again, you're involved somehow with the higher ups."

...that explains why I allow you to rant for weeks on end, yes?

...that explains why you're still here, yes? .

...that expalisn why I tolerate a mouth-breather like Steve D. C'mon, Jimmy. :P You're not scamming anyone with this kind of BS.

"You seem to get a kick out of it, which is even worse."

I get a "kick" out of defending The Church against falsehoods and debunking those who try to mislead Catholics. It's not my fault I'm right. That's because I side with The Church. You should try it some time. :)

"Anyway, you keep talking about people being off topic, but all you do is go off topic."

My first comment here was a reply to yours. ;-) Whoops. Unlike you, I don't have an agenda to push.

"Pro tip: if you don't like me you do not have to engage with me. I certainly don't like it."

Entirely understandable. Falsehood never likes being corrected, especially when it's trying very hard to mislead others. In that, you're no different than any other crank.

"I am what I am and I'm pretty happy with it."

That's the sad part. Truly.

Major insight from this citation from the 'Bible of Garabandal', Se fue con prisas a la Montaña (She went in haste to the Mountain):

"During the winter of 1963, he [Serafín] felt that as the eldest brother and the man of the house, he should take a stand concerning Conchita. So one night while the family was in the kitchen of the house, he said to Conchita, “You will have to tell us once and for all what this is all about; we can’t go on like this. And don’t be afraid of what will happen . . . I’m ready to take you away from the village and bring you anywhere you want. If you want to go to school, we can arrange that too . . . But we have to know the truth. All these things about the apparitions: Are they true, or are they something that you made up?” Conchita replied that it was true, that she had seen the Virgin, that it wasn’t something that the girls made up, and that there was no reason to leave the village . .
The matter remained that way during the night. But the next day, while Serafín was in the kitchen and his sister upstairs, he heard her call him, “Serafín! Come up a minute.” The man told me [Father Eusebio Garcia de Pesquera] he felt as if his heart missed a beat as he thought, “There it is! She has finally made up her mind. She must have thought about this all night long and is going to tell me that it has all been a fraud.”
—“What do you want?” He asked her on arriving upstairs.
—“So that you can see that all this is true, the Virgin has told me to tell you this . . .”

And she talked to him about the Miracle, and explained in what it was going to consist. Later Conchita wrote it down briefly on the back of a holy card of the Child Jesus, which Serafín keeps concealed and which none of the family have seen. And she told him that it would occur when a definite event in the Church [*un determinado acontecimiento en la Iglesia] took place, and she also explained it to him. Only in this way does Serafín know the date of the miracle. Later Serafín and I [Father Eusebio Garcia de Pesquera] discussed the following excerpt from a leaflet written by Dr. Puncernau:

---During one of my trips to the pastures, I [Dr. Puncernau] was alone with Serafín and we were eating in the barn. After eating, I tried to draw him out since it was said that he knew from Conchita when the Warning would be. I [Dr. Puncernau] drew the conclusion that if he [Serafín] knew, he didn’t want to say. The only thing that I got definitely from him was that it would be preceded by a special happening in the Church. After many questions and answers, it seemed clear to me from his vague remarks that it would be something like a schism. That is the way I [Dr. Puncernau] understood it.---

—“And what do you say about Dr. Puncernau’s opinion?” I [Father Eusebio Garcia de Pesquera] asked Serafín.
—“He [Dr. Puncernau] is free to think what he wants. But I [Serafín] don’t think I gave him reasons for such an opinion.”
—“But will this happening actually be a schism in the Church?”
—“I [Serafín] have nothing to say.”

"During that May of 1976, I [Father Eusebio Garcia de Pesquera] spoke also with Jacinta’s mother, María. She told me that she had heard repeatedly from her daughter that affairs were going to go very bad for the Church, that the Eucharist would constantly be given less importance, that many priests would become worse and worse, and that wickedness would spread everywhere. It can be noticed that Dr. Puncernau does not speak of the Miracle, but of the Warning. Is this a mistake? Perhaps not." - She went in haste to the Mountain by Eusebio Garcia de Pesquera, O.F.M., CAP. Translated from Spanish by B. Miller, Gerard Suel and Otto Miller Second English Edition of 1981 original translation published unaltered in one volume in 2003 pdf p. 577-578.

*NOTE: the phrase "un determinado acontecimiento en la Iglesia" can be translated;
- "a particular event (occurrence) in the Church"
- "a specific event (occurrence) in the Church"
- "a definite event (occurrence) in the Church"
- "a certain event (occurrence) in the Church"
However, it is INCORRECT to translate that phrase as "a great event in the Church" or "a happy event in the Church."

“Serafín, Conchita’s brother, affirms having heard his sister announce during an ecstasy, that the Warning will be brought about after the Church has been cruelly torn by “something like a schism.” - Garabandal The Village Speaks by Ramon Pérez. Translated from the French by Annette I. Curot Mathews. Translation published in 1981 p. 350-351.

Antonia Gonzalez, Conchita's aunt, stated, "I have also heard them say that if we do not amend our lives, Russia will rule the world. Yes, they said all that, in front of me, during their ecstasy. And also that some big Chastisement would come. Conchita often repeated it. She also talked about the cardinals - that they would go against the Pope." - Garabandal The Village Speaks by Ramon Pérez. Translated from the French by Annette I. Curot Mathews. Translation published in 1981 p. 206.

If Bergoglio were to 'consecrate' Russia to Mary's Immaculate Heart with the bishops, it would have no effect. Indeed, it might make things worse. The pope and the rest of the bishops ("The Church") needs to do this. If something is led by an antipope it cannot be legitimate.

Also, since Bergoglio is a heretic as well, he simply won't do anything that promotes Christian peace and salvation.