Ultraviolet

A Refutation of John Laurer's "Recommendation"

As usual, "John Laurer" (the latest alias of GTV's single-most-banned user, Jimmy) disabled the comments to stifle the truth. This post is a platform for the discussion he fears. All are welcome, …
Mathathias Maccabeus
@Marysrose yeah. It’s pretty sad.
Marysrose
I've had Liberal trolls tell me that they are paid for every nasty, derogatory, vicious, etc., jab that they post on conservative/Catholic sites and …More
I've had Liberal trolls tell me that they are paid for every nasty, derogatory, vicious, etc., jab that they post on conservative/Catholic sites and posts. Such Liberal strategy of childish name-calling, lying, personal attacks, etc., are all listed on the Marxist Manifesto. Such strategy is used because they have no real or reasonable arguments.
3 more comments

A Correction For Benedict Hierusalem.

Losers block. Winners get blocked. Which explains why you can comment on my posts and I can't comment on yours. "He clearly was on the back foot" Is that why somebody complained to GTV's admin …
Ultraviolet
@Jimmy aka Yuri M Jachob if GTV has "gone down in flames" that's because they haven't appointed a mod to insta-ban your endless sock-puppet accounts…More
@Jimmy aka Yuri M Jachob if GTV has "gone down in flames" that's because they haven't appointed a mod to insta-ban your endless sock-puppet accounts. ;-)
Ultraviolet
This post is a correction of your assumption, BH. I didn't take my post down. You clearly won't take the bet. I want that preserved. This second …More
This post is a correction of your assumption, BH. I didn't take my post down. You clearly won't take the bet. I want that preserved. This second post is proof of that.
"MM has posted that to say are to say you are..."
MM didn't make that comment. You did. It's a screen-cap of YOUR comment. Gotcha. Looks like the party's over. ;-)
2 more comments

A Refutation of Alex Jacyck's "It Must Be God's Will!"

Since Mr. Yerian fears an open discussion of his post (as usual) this will serve as the forum he fears. Unlike you, I don't run sock-puppet accounts and I don't make excuses for pedophiles. You do, …
Mathathias Maccabeus
@Alex Jacyck My good brother, everything you said about loving God and defending Him went out the window with your threat against Ultraviolet. …More
@Alex Jacyck My good brother, everything you said about loving God and defending Him went out the window with your threat against Ultraviolet. Saying God is on your side while spewing schismatic and uncharitable things, while threatening others for merely proving you wrong, while saying that things aren’t going according to God’s will, while saying people who trust in God’s will and have faith in God are clowns (by your own meme), is blasphemy and a sin against the second commandment. “Thou shalt not take the Lord’s name in vain.”
It seems to me, my good brother, you know nothing about Catholic teaching. Time and time again you break the Commandments of God. Time and time again you show yourself as a hypocrite.
I beseech you to think about what you say, my good brother, and repent of your wickedness, now laid open for all by your open threats of physical violence against Ultraviolet.
7 more comments

A Refutation of Joey Dix "Who Are Our Betters?"

Jimmy Yerian under his latest alias @Joey Dix now justifies his mockery of Fr. Matthew P Schneider on the priest's own post. Mr. Yerian disabled his comments, so this post will provide the forum …
Mathathias Maccabeus
Since you turned off your comments after you unsuccessfully tried insulting me @Joey Dix, and since you once again do not leave your own posts open …More
Since you turned off your comments after you unsuccessfully tried insulting me @Joey Dix, and since you once again do not leave your own posts open for feedback, I’ll post it here. With a screen cap of what I am responding to.
@Joey Dix Actually no, a good Catholic does not focus on the Bishop of Rome (good for you to admit it for once! You’ve made so much progress, I am so happy you finally admit that Francis is the Bishop of Rome! You finally acknowledge his papacy!) the way you do. For all of history until recently, the pope was only heard from by most when a dogma was declared, or when a new pope was elected.
Second, at BEST, you are committing the sin or detraction, a sin against sin the 8th commandment. At worst you are committing the sin of Calumny (worst because you are publicly sharing a made up act of sin), also a sin against the 8th commandment.
For a “Catholic” you sure are fine with mortally sinning. For someone who claims to love Christ you sure do like to break His …More
Mathathias Maccabeus
And @Joey Dix, when someone oversteps their bounds as a layman and shows disrespect to a superior, it is for us to say, “how dare you”
4 more comments

A Refutation of Jared E Malone's "Who is Ultraviolet?"

A more relevant question is "Who is Jared E Malone?" Unlike @Jared E Malone I have only one account. "Jared E Malone" is just the latest of many accounts by a James Michael Yerian in Ohio. His …
Ultraviolet
"I'm a big-picture guy." @Jared E Malone Yes you are, Jimmy. And your depiction of reality looks like Jackson Pollock. Who would have guessed you'd …More
"I'm a big-picture guy." @Jared E Malone Yes you are, Jimmy. And your depiction of reality looks like Jackson Pollock. Who would have guessed you'd combine that with Picasso's use of feces as painting medium?
"I don't have time to play your game..."
...yet youhad hours to argue with Matty on this post. Funny thing.
"having people get lost in the weeds."
Ave Crux uses that same cop-out whenever the facts contradict her as well. Yer weeeeds. I'm not gettin' lost in 'em. :P
Protip: Baseless accusations aren't a 'meta-argument', genius. It's just noise. Unlike your post, at least I can back the claims I make. ;-)
Mathathias Maccabeus
@Jared E Malone Why don’t you ever do a point by point rebuttal like we do? You just deflect and throw slings on other people. Also, I don’t think …More
@Jared E Malone Why don’t you ever do a point by point rebuttal like we do? You just deflect and throw slings on other people.
Also, I don’t think you know what gaslighting is.
4 more comments
Ultraviolet shares from kleineseelejesu
102.1K
I try not to bomb those whoo "follow" me with a stream of articles. You've paid me a profound compliment and I'm ever-mindful of it. In terms of Canon Law this article is the legal equivalent of St. …More
I try not to bomb those whoo "follow" me with a stream of articles. You've paid me a profound compliment and I'm ever-mindful of it.
In terms of Canon Law this article is the legal equivalent of St. Michael The Archangel and the Heavenly Host routing the Fallen Angels straight out of Heaven.
Notice the author's genius in finding this legal loophole.
"In considering Article 3, it is worthwhile to note that the provisions of this article refer to the “Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970.” Strictly understood, the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970 is the editio typica of 1965 with the alterations of Tres abhinc annos of 4 May 1967. This is not the 1962 Missal. To this author’s knowledge, the 1965 missal is used hardly, if ever.
What the author said is legally correct. "Restrictions require strict interpretaton". --to which I would modestly add, "what is meant is not what was written."
If Pope Francis and his cronies meant to restrct the 1962 Missal and, in their Canonica…More

LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS ON "TRADITIONIS CUSTODES" - written by a Priest and Canon Lawyer

Article: "Legal Considerations on the motu proprio Traditionis Custodes" - Restrictions demand strict interpretation by Fr. Pierre Laliberté, J.C.L.* 1. Principles The motu proprio “Traditionis Cust…
Ultraviolet
...a proper interpretation of Session 7 Canon 13 of the DOGMATIC Council of Trent, instead of some mindless nabob simply referencing it, @DefeatMore
...a proper interpretation of Session 7 Canon 13 of the DOGMATIC Council of Trent, instead of some mindless nabob simply referencing it, @Defeat Modernism As I recall, you tend to do reference this whenever you don't know what you're talking about and don't have anything better to say.
Defeat Modernism
Session 7 Canon 13 of the DOGMATIC Council of Trent. Pope St. Pius V in Quo Primum. Thousands of years of Tradition. What more do you faithless …More
Session 7 Canon 13 of the DOGMATIC Council of Trent. Pope St. Pius V in Quo Primum. Thousands of years of Tradition. What more do you faithless people need?
8 more comments
Ultraviolet
11.1K

Easter Two Thousand Twenty One

A year when literature and reality overlap entirely too closely.
aderito
sin has no boundaries
Ultraviolet
101K

F M Shyanguya: GTV's Resident Cuckoo Bird.

Many on GTV know I have a passion for defending the truth and correcting falsehood. The latter requires me to address F M Shyanguya's latest insanity "Matrix Agents in place on GTV" The man's gone…
Ultraviolet
Claiming a "distortion" without demonstrating it is a baseless accusation Feel free to do so. "Knock yourself out", eh? ;-)
Ultraviolet
On the contrary, I'm directly addressing your claim by noting that "getting away with it" is by no means unique nor proof of a mysterious "connectio…More
On the contrary, I'm directly addressing your claim by noting that "getting away with it" is by no means unique nor proof of a mysterious "connection" to GTV.
I'm also pointing out your selective focus is rank hypocrisy. Is that short and simple enough for you @Saveusfromhell ?
8 more comments
Ultraviolet
31K

A Refutation Of Zechariah 4:06's "You're Not in Schism..."

Short answer: Yes, the author Zechariah 4:06 is in schism. So is his source, Anne Barnhardt. First, "Ius Canonicum" while sounding very "Canonical" is a book about Canon Law. It is the author's …
Ultraviolet
@Saveusfromhell First, if you read my comments a bit more closely, you'd notice that "Ius Canonicum", 7:398, 1943 is not Canon Law. It is private …More
@Saveusfromhell
First, if you read my comments a bit more closely, you'd notice that "Ius Canonicum", 7:398, 1943 is not Canon Law. It is private work written by two priests.
Second, my concerns about the authors' use of "they" is a contextual one and not a Canonical one. Simply put, you're asking for a legal citation from the Catholic Church for what is essentially a grammatical problem stemming from a truncated quotation.
Apples and oranges.
Third, the full passage from which the two priests are quoted is missing. The obligation for providing that context, is on those using the original citation to argue their position.
In other words, providing you the full quote is the duty of Anne Barnhardt and Mr. Daly, since she's the one almost certainly quoting him, and he's the one quoting those authors.
I am not required to clarify a reference they inadequately cited. All I need do is point out the discrepancy present in what they HAVE cited. ;-)
"hence the reason latin is the offical…More
2 more comments
Ultraviolet
466

A Refutation of Zechariah 4:06's "Canon 751 and Christian Logic"

GTV user Zechariah 4:06 has written a new article "Canon 751 and Christian Logic" At the risk of overstating the obvious, it follows his usual standards of scholarship on Canon Law along with his …
Ultraviolet
3755

A Refutation of Zechariah 4:14's "Why Pope Francis..."

GTV user Zechariah 4:14 posted a treatise called "Why Pope Francis is an Antipope: Canon 332.2". Edit: Zechariah 4:14 has changed his name once again. GTV should seriously consider disabling the …
Ultraviolet
"This "news item" is that a poster to stop from being attacked by ultraviolet has blocked ultraviolet." @Saveusfromhell No, this is a refutation on …More
"This "news item" is that a poster to stop from being attacked by ultraviolet has blocked ultraviolet." @Saveusfromhell
No, this is a refutation on Canon Law. It is also a refutation of attacks made against me. Funny how, like every cross-eyed hypocrite, you ignore that fact.
Zechariah 4:14/ 4:06/ whatever else he's calling himself, the name he's registered to vote under is James Michael Yerian, misrepresented Canon Law. Worse, he lied about me. They are lies since I have corrected the false information directly to him numerous times. Yet he persists in repeating those falsehoods for the obvious and self-evident purpose of defaming me. That, incidentally, is a grave i.e. mortal sin.
"This is simply baiting another poster to engage so ultraviolet can continue to abuse the poster."
Wrong. This post is the only option I have to publicly answer a.) the falsehoods Mr. Yerian has told regarding Canon Law and b.) the lies he told about me.
Not surprisingly, like him, you see only what …More
2 more comments
Ultraviolet
935

The Lion of Judah & Lyin' From KristianKeller

Since attack-posts are the new GTV fashion, defense-posts are only fair. For some time now, KristianKeller has been obsessing over a discussion we had in late November/ early December of last year. …