No “Conspiracy Theory”: Second Eucharistic Prayer Was Written in Restaurant
Father Dominic Allain writes that many facts concerning the liturgical reform (1969/70) were once dismissed as "conspiracy theories". But then they turned out to be historically accurate. Allain points …More
Father Dominic Allain writes that many facts concerning the liturgical reform (1969/70) were once dismissed as "conspiracy theories". But then they turned out to be historically accurate.
Allain points on CatholicHeral.co.uk (January 31) to the widely known fact that the modernist Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, the inventor of the New Mass, wrote the Second Eucharistic Prayer on the fly in a Roman trattoria.
This product de facto replaced the Roman Canon which is of Apostolic origin and was used unchanged for nearly two millenniums.
Allain further reminds that before the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) out of 2109 bishops only one wanted the entire Mass in vernacular language.
Picture: Annibale Bugnini, #newsRllmwvqqjt
Allain points on CatholicHeral.co.uk (January 31) to the widely known fact that the modernist Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, the inventor of the New Mass, wrote the Second Eucharistic Prayer on the fly in a Roman trattoria.
This product de facto replaced the Roman Canon which is of Apostolic origin and was used unchanged for nearly two millenniums.
Allain further reminds that before the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) out of 2109 bishops only one wanted the entire Mass in vernacular language.
Picture: Annibale Bugnini, #newsRllmwvqqjt
There is no such thing as a well intentioned Machiavellian. To think that you can lie and deceive even the Pope is diabolical. No! I'm sure the book he read is quite convincing but the overarching parameters governing Bugnini's work are clear. The fact he was a simplistic man is neither here nor there. There is one overriding belief that he held to that is quite diabolical "the Catholic Rite of Mass …More
There is no such thing as a well intentioned Machiavellian. To think that you can lie and deceive even the Pope is diabolical. No! I'm sure the book he read is quite convincing but the overarching parameters governing Bugnini's work are clear. The fact he was a simplistic man is neither here nor there. There is one overriding belief that he held to that is quite diabolical "the Catholic Rite of Mass, as it is, needs to go". How could any man who claims any love for God or the Faith hold that principle. It is absolutely clear from the changes made that they wanted to downplay the Trinity, downplay the Sacrifice of Calvary, promote protestantism and move away from the fact of Real Presence of Jesus Christ. That is not well intentioned. Furthermore, they use simplicity as a disguise. When they are found out their nefarious chorus is always the same. "We never meant for things to turn out the way they did, honestly, we didn't BUT WE CAN'T CHANGE BACK NOW!"